NYT Plans Exclusive Story on Iraq and Research of Nuke Bomb

the drudge report ^ | 11/2/06 | matt drudge

[RVN Airplane Driver]

Would it be out of the realm of possibility that the NYT has finally figured out.....traveling down the road they have been traveling is leading to nowhere....of course the eltist plicks in the NE...wouldn't figure that out.... It can be argured that it is further from the South to Washington DC now than was during the Civil War....I expect in the next 100 years that my Grandchildren will see things that I would never expect..

[Jet Jaguar]

Your theory is the best so far.

[letsgonova19087]

I'm thinking its a possibility. Didn't I just see that their circulation numbers for NYTimes and Boston Globe fell again? Maybe this is the start of a campaign to try to bring some moderate-to-conservatives into their camp by cozying up to them before an election. Or, just as likely, they have a big story that their "inner reporter" conscience is just itching to tell

[A Citizen Reporter]

"Wolf Blitzer today to return to Mark Foley"

Hilarious. Yesterday, MSNBC had a news flash crawl saying that Foley was going to remain in rehab! Big News, LOL.

[COEXERJ145]

I hope you don't mind if I borrow your post and use it on another forum. :-)

[Enchante]

What I would love (but I'm sure not expecting it) is if some reporter(s) developed evidence that Iraq collaborated with Libya and/or Syria on nuke programs, and even though the NY Slimes hates to be the bearer of such news, they would not dare suppress it.

However, what goes against that (beside the treasonous and despicable nature of Pinch, Keller, et al) is that in such a scenario they would NEVER publish just 4 days before a national election - they would have gotten it out there long ago, or else they would hold the story until after Nov. 7.

We will be in suspense now until more info hits the web....

[Prost1]

Wolf is just jealous he never received any emails or chat messages from Foley.

And, Wolf is still waiting for Shep's call.

[SuzyQue]

I want some of whatever you're smoking.

[RedCell]

I would LOVE it if this were the case. Unfortunately, we're talking about the Slimes and they don't understand being put in peril - even when it's their own.

[Prost1]

Prost Eins!

[HoosierHawk]

Just a wild theory.

Wild indeed.

OTOH, The Times is so screwed, you might be gloating tomorrow.

[Zeppo]

Ha! Help yourself...

[PghBaldy]

I will not assume anything, but with the Times, it is hard not to. Could mean many things. I have my thoughts that it will surprise me (and not be negative to Repubs).

[Fresh Wind]

A few weeks back, a FReeper whose name I unfortunately forget, posted something about being aware (from unnamed sources, of course) that there was something big about to happen in connection with a grand jury that was investigating the leaks.

[yield 2 the right]

The USA under a Republican President gave the Nuke Bomb know how to Iraq during the Iraq-Iran War in the 1980's and the current Bush administration tried to cover that up. IE, USA is responsible for Iraq's WMD if any are found.......

[Jet Jaguar]

I recall that as well, I believe.

We shall see.

[BluH2o]

This is easy ... the NYSlimes will imply that had Bush not attacked Iraq there would never be any reason for Iraq to pursue a nuclear program. That will be the thrust of the story

[COEXERJ145]

Thanks.

The forum is mostly made up of U.S. liberals and Eurotrash so I try to annoy them whenever the opportunity arises. (Too bad, it was a nice place when I joined 6+ years ago.)

[Popman]

any idea what this might mean?

Hit piece on Bush coming

There is no other news template for the NYT's

Even if it a positive Iraq development, it will be presented as something Bush didn't do right

[jveritas]

In fact if they have published the NSA wiretap story in October 2004 it would have helped President Bush and the Republican Party and we would have a bigger vicotry margin.