Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America’s undersea advantage sails on
The State ^ | September 7, 2006 | W. Thomas Smith Jr.

Posted on 09/07/2006 5:41:39 AM PDT by SuzyQ2

In the pre-dawn darkness of Sept. 7, 1776 — exactly 230 years ago today — an odd-looking barrel-shaped craft silently made its way down the Hudson River from Manhattan toward a British warship, HMS Eagle, anchored in New York harbor. ...

Clearly, the U.S. Navy today maintains the most technologically sophisticated submarine fleet on the planet. But it is not just a fleet of fast-attacks and big nuclear missile-armed “boomers.”

To fight the war on terror, the Navy continues to develop its special-operations capable Advanced SEAL Delivery System, a super-stealthy miniature submarine bristling with electronic wizardry and capable of delivering 14 Navy SEALs (SEa-Air-Land commandos) anywhere in the world.

(Excerpt) Read more at thestate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: New York; US: South Carolina; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushnell; holland; housatonic; hunley; nautilus; navy; new; royal; seal; submarine; thames; turtle; verne; war; york

1 posted on 09/07/2006 5:41:42 AM PDT by SuzyQ2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doohickey; patton

Worked on the ASDS interior arrangements and cables.

Lots of money into that thing: It changed from a simple "get the job done by the Seals" to a NASA-level "man-rated" mini-sub.


2 posted on 09/07/2006 5:49:37 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQ2

Ah yes, the Columbia, SC rag that chortled as Charleston's Navy Base, the longest serving submarine homeport, was closed. Longer serving than even SubBase New London.

Like Clinton they said 'put some ice on it,' you'll get over it.


3 posted on 09/07/2006 5:51:38 AM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I didn't think the new sub for SEALs was a mini-sub?


4 posted on 09/07/2006 6:04:38 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Mission creep. LOL.


5 posted on 09/07/2006 6:19:20 AM PDT by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Don't expect accuracy from the MSM.


6 posted on 09/07/2006 6:20:30 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I didn't think the new sub for SEALs was a mini-sub?

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/NAVY_SEALs_ASDS_Cutaway_lg.gif&imgrefurl=http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/forces_special_ops/index.php&h=293&w=673&sz=36&hl=en&start=10&tbnid=IT135b_wzS8nBM:&tbnh=60&tbnw=138&prev=/images%3Fq%3DASDS%2BSeals%2B%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DG

Long image id, but that is the interior.

Another foreign source, showing the ASDS out of water, its parent article compares the ASDS to other submersibles...

http://www.navyseals.cz/webfoto/photo/foto_technika/cluny_ponorky/miniponorky_asds/asds1.jpg

Will another be built? Can't tell. I think the original sponsors got badly burned with the extra costs and delays of "specification creep" ...
7 posted on 09/07/2006 6:26:49 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Will another be built? Can't tell. I think the original sponsors got badly burned with the extra costs and delays of "specification creep"

not likely.
B/C of Gold-Plating gets 'em every time....many don't want to be sujected (again) to the "problems".

8 posted on 09/07/2006 6:49:41 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/NAVY_SEALs_ASDS_Cutaway_lg.gif


9 posted on 09/07/2006 8:19:34 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQ2
I love new weapons, but I heard it's TERRIFICALLY over-budget, super newfangled, unreliable as hell, and everybody hates it.

Just totally screwed-up.

10 posted on 09/07/2006 10:31:49 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQ2

11 posted on 09/07/2006 12:41:10 PM PDT by presidio9 (“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
geez, that looks smaller than the subs at the old submarine ride and Disneyland.

I wonder what it will sound like breaking up at crush depth...
12 posted on 09/07/2006 12:44:02 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rottndog

It's big enough to take out a supertanker in Hormuz before we get a chance to stop it.


13 posted on 09/07/2006 12:45:27 PM PDT by presidio9 (“The term ‘civilians’ does not exist in Islamic religious law.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Yeah, but it would only get one, and in short order after that Iran's entire navy would be completely wiped out.


14 posted on 09/07/2006 1:08:08 PM PDT by rottndog (WOOF!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson