Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Ann Coulter) They Shot the Wrong Lincoln
Human Events ^ | 30 August 2006 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 08/30/2006 2:40:47 PM PDT by Spiff

They Shot the Wrong Lincoln

by Ann Coulter
Posted Aug 30, 2006

In addition to supporting Democrat Joe Lieberman over Republican Alan Schlesinger in Connecticut, President Bush is supporting the Democrat over the Republican in Rhode Island, too. In the Republican primary, Bush supports Lincoln Chafee -- who votes with Bush on the important issues less often than Sen. Lieberman does -- over the only actual Republican in the race, Stephen Laffey.

Apart from Bush, the only person who hasn't figured out that Lincoln Chafee is a Democrat is Lincoln Chafee. As the expression goes, if Chafee switched parties, the average IQ on both sides of the aisle would go up.

It's hard to figure why Bush would support a half-wit like Lincoln Chafee. Maybe he believes his own poll numbers and is trying to help the conservatives by endorsing their opponents.

After Chafee's family money got him into Andover and Brown, he made his living shoeing horses for seven years. In fact, I've often wondered if an errant kick to the head by one of his charges would account for Chafee's rudimentary cognitive abilities.

That remains Chafee's only professional accomplishment -- unless you include the "fun zone" for kids on his official Senate Web site. Perhaps we could install a "play zone" like they have at McDonald's in the Senate well to keep Chafee occupied while the real senators go about their business.

When the farrier business proved too taxing for Chafee's intellect, he went into the family business -- politics. His father died in office, and Lincoln was appointed by the governor to serve out the remainder of Pop's term in the U.S. Senate. (I know Rhode Island is small, but couldn't they find someone who reads books right side up to fill the seat?) In terms of qualifications for the job, Chafee makes Michael Brown look like Donald Rumsfeld.

Chafee is everything the Democrats like to claim Republicans are, which we are not and they are: silver-spoon morons who get ahead on the basis of family connections (for example, Ned the Red Lamont in Connecticut).

The only reason Chafee calls himself a Republican is that he believes that everyone above a certain income level is required by law to do so.

He learned this from reading "Doonesbury" and watching "The West Wing" while studiously ignoring blindingly obvious facts like: Sens. Teddy Kennedy (inherited millions), John Kerry (married millions -- twice, lucky guy), Sen. Herbert H. Kohl (inherited millions), John D. Rockefeller (inherited millions), Mark Dayton (inherited millions), Dianne Feinstein (married millions) and aspiring senator Ned the Red (inherited millions). All Democrats.

In addition to the Democratic trait of having absolutely no idea how wealth is generated, Chafee's other Democratic characteristics include:

Stop complaining about taxes -- just live off your trust fund like a normal person! Taxes, I note, have virtually no bearing on someone who is not currently earning an income but living off incomes earned generations ago by better men than he.

Chafee even voted against Samuel Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court.

Republicans are always told we're supposed to vote for Fidel Dumbo if he has an "R" after his name so Republican nominees will be confirmed to the Supreme Court. That is true: Save terrorism, there is no more important issue than a president's Supreme Court nominees. But Bush had two Supreme Court nominees and Chafee voted against 50 percent of them, so Chafee doesn't even have that argument going for him.

Chafee explained his vote against Alito -- but for John Roberts -- by invoking the Democrats' idiotic talking point about maintaining "balance" on the court.

"Balance," like "meaningful consultation with the Senate before choosing the nominee," means precisely one thing: a Republican is in the White House. Democrats subscribe to the Brezhnev doctrine: "What we have, we hold." Their interpretation of elections they win by a plurality is that they have a mandate for Ruth Bader Ginsburg; their interpretation of elections they lose is that this means they get to block all Republican nominees.

Steve Laffey is the molecular opposite of Chafee: He is smart, self-made -- and a Republican. He is one of five children and was the first member of his family to go to college -- Bowdoin College, and then on to Harvard Business School. He was president of a brokerage firm, a position he acquired by hard work and native talent, not by attending his father's funeral.

Laffey is the sort of decent, talented person that makes you wonder why he would bother entering an irritating profession like politics. But he did, becoming mayor of Cranston, R.I., when the city was near bankruptcy. Within two years, Laffey had raised Cranston's bond rating from the lowest in the country to investment grade, earning him the sobriquet "the anti-Dennis Kucinich."

True, Rhode Island is an overwhelmingly Democratic state, and the chances of any Republican winning the general election are slim. But that's no reason for the Republican Party to debase itself by running someone dysfunctional and illiterate enough to appeal to Democrats.





TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chafee; rino; senaterinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Tim Long
The point is that he was the perceived liberal in the race. Tancredo's Team America supported Jacob. It was also a fairly close race.

Cannon's Utah district is one of the most conservative in the country. So you seem to be saying that a lot of conservatives voted for a liberal. That's not true, but that's what you seem to be saying.

Also, the race was not close. Cannon won by ten percentage points.

Tancredo took a huge risk in trying to unseat one of his fellow congressmembers. It blew up in his face.

61 posted on 08/30/2006 4:46:04 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Let's see here. President Bush supports the incumbent Republican, and Ann Coulter says that the "wrong Lincoln was shot."

Uffda! I think Ann may have finally gone a bit too far.


62 posted on 08/30/2006 5:02:54 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo


63 posted on 08/30/2006 5:06:19 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger; AZ_Cowboy

Pinging to the weekly Ann Coulter!


64 posted on 08/30/2006 5:06:55 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkapotamus

I can't decide if I prefer the frog pictures or those cute red Xs.


65 posted on 08/30/2006 5:12:44 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

the nrcc's job s to protect incumbents and retain the majorty... graf can't hold that seat. it would be gex williams all over again. huffman can win it which is why they have weighed in on his behalf


66 posted on 08/30/2006 5:23:02 PM PDT by PDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: neocon1984
Image and video hosting by TinyPic "Ann is right about LC being an idiot. His eyes show little spark of intelligence, but a lot of feeling. Hence, he should go over to the Democrat side of the aisle."
67 posted on 08/30/2006 5:28:39 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

"Hate Speech! Hate Speech!"
/liberals/demmies off


68 posted on 08/30/2006 5:29:41 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX (Bible Thumper and Proud!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Challenging a RINO is a huge risk? Borne out of necessity, due to amnesty support. Hopefully Cannon will see the light or face a stronger border candidate in "08." Jacobs self destruction was not a referendum on Tancredo.
69 posted on 08/30/2006 5:30:41 PM PDT by caresistance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Uff da (from a Norwegian):

The only way Ann coud go too far would be to ... (well I do not have to spell out my old age fantasies).


70 posted on 08/30/2006 5:35:49 PM PDT by neocon1984 (end the idiocy of post-modernism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: caresistance
Challenging a RINO is a huge risk?

Cannon is no RINO, not with a 98% ACU rating. And, yes it was a risk, as Tancredo lost.

Jacobs self destruction was not a referendum on Tancredo.

Sure it is. He stuck his neck out and got it chopped off. Wanna bet he doesn't try to unseat any other GOP sitting congressmen?

71 posted on 08/30/2006 5:37:11 PM PDT by sinkspur (Today, we settled all family business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

"Taxes, I note, have virtually no bearing on someone who is not currently earning an income but living off incomes earned generations ago by better men than he."

One of AC's best lines this year.Several truths in one short sentence.

Better men than he indeed......


72 posted on 08/30/2006 5:40:35 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Okay, look, this is not my line, but it is one I agree with. The first conservative I heard use it was Bill Buckley, so the genealogy isn't bad: "Support the most viable rightward candidate." In Rhode Island that almost certainly means support the half-wit, alas, as the lesser evil. (Half-wit, alas, should probably be one word).


73 posted on 08/30/2006 5:53:38 PM PDT by publius1 (Just to be clear: my position is no.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon

Wasn't Thune the one that ran against Tom Daschle and won?


74 posted on 08/30/2006 6:00:04 PM PDT by appleton14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: razzle
Pulling the GOP handle will ALWAYS get the less liberal candidate.

Oh, I wouldn't make an absolute statement such as that. ALWAYS is a long time and there have been many instances of someone like Chaffee being elected over a more, shall we say, less "progressive" democrat. Some democrats, such as Liberman can actually be good for the country in time war for instance over a RINO who dislikes our use of force to settle things. I know for instance that Reagan was a democrat at one time. So I believe that it is not always true that the "R" guarantees a more conservative result or as you say a less liberal one. Not always.

75 posted on 08/30/2006 6:01:35 PM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

75 posts and only one pic? What's wrong with this thread?


76 posted on 08/30/2006 6:02:21 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (illegal aliens commit crimes that Americans won't commit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: Spiff

Ann Darlin, If I wasn't so old and decrepid and could go back to the man I was 20 years ago, (before I realised how intellectually ignorant I am, I'd be hitting on you. But correct the heading to "they shot the wrong Lincoln, and the wrong Dean took a Viet Nam Vacation". You'd get miles out of it darlin. Semper Fi, Stumpy.


78 posted on 08/30/2006 6:22:30 PM PDT by stumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
"Balance," like "meaningful consultation with the Senate before choosing the nominee," means precisely one thing: a Republican is in the White House. Democrats subscribe to the Brezhnev doctrine: "What we have, we hold." Their interpretation of elections they win by a plurality is that they have a mandate for Ruth Bader Ginsburg; their interpretation of elections they lose is that this means they get to block all Republican nominees.

Man! I just love the way this woman writes!!!!!

79 posted on 08/30/2006 6:30:48 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

You think the President would have learned from supporting Spector over Toomey, then having Spector repeatedly stab him in the back. Chaffee is one senator we can do without. At least Laffey is a candidate you can respect.


80 posted on 08/30/2006 6:33:09 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson