Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/03/2006 4:50:00 PM PDT by Logic Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: Logic Times

The purists' hatred for Bush could kill the conservative movement...and put 'rats in power for a generation.


2 posted on 05/03/2006 4:53:59 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

Interesting, especially the pics.


3 posted on 05/03/2006 4:54:07 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

Excellent post!


4 posted on 05/03/2006 4:54:50 PM PDT by jdm (Always looking for an opportunity to post a nasty Helen Thomas pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

I think a decent solution would be for conservatives to vote out the liberal Republicans during the primaries. Whether Bush is conservative or not is moot - he is not up for re-election. However, getting rid of those liberal Republicans in the House and Senate will go a long way toward showing the executive branch what we want. That should be our focus.


11 posted on 05/03/2006 5:10:26 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

Ungh... Another "not as bad as the other guys" argument. Complete with photographs.

APf


13 posted on 05/03/2006 5:18:05 PM PDT by APFel (Loose ships sink lips.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times
The conservatives who have for the most part taken over Free Republic will produce their own destruction and perhaps the destruction of much of the nation.

The conservatives will never accept the achievable as acceptable performance. They want it all and they want it now. They will not accept two steps forward and one step back. They want all steps forward. What they soon achieve is three steps back followed by three more.

It is what LBJ told me in 1968. When I asked how he managed to get liberal programs passed that FDR tried and failed to pass, he said he could not have done it with out conservative help. He said it was the Goldwaterite position of throw out the RINOs and go for all or nothing that got Goldwater nothing and LBJ everything.

The most disastrous thing for conservatives is for the most part they not get involved with the efforts needed to convince a majority of the voters to their positions. They have no sales skills and refuse to learn them. They spout their ideological positions which centrists reject. Then after massive defeats they console themselves by thinking the problem was their failure to get their message out.

They mostly just blame RINO Republicans for not doing what it will take to make conservatives a majority.

The margin of victory for Republicans is coming more and more from those to the left of center. So that is where many Republicans including George Bush are moving.

Conservatives never figure it out. Candidates always try to emulate the positions of those who win races. When the right sits on its hands, the lesson the Republican candidates learn is to move more to the left to replace them with left of center moderates. That just moves the center more to the left. That has been happening for 75 years.

The right never learns from its failures or its successes.

14 posted on 05/03/2006 5:19:00 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

Uh-huh, and where do I fit into this equasion?

Most of my ire is directed at the Congress. I oppose strongly the President's proposal on immigration, but he ran on it and I'd be a a hypocrite to claim betrayal. I've gone head to head with the crowds that both want to impeach the President, and with those that support everything he does because he's the President. I like him, he's going to be remembered as one of the Greats, I have vision enough to see beyond today and know that. And he'll have earned that legacy. He's still wrong on immigration.

I defended Tom Delay and, infact, feel betrayed by both those classified as the "betrayed Conservative" and the Moderate establishment. Each threw him overboard, and I've given National Review several bitter tongue lashes for leading the fight.

I supported incrementalism by supporting NCLB as well as private accounts for social security.

I refused to support Miers because, frankly, her qualifications were not good enough. Nor did I see any discernible Judicial philosophy. After decades of being disappointed with incrementalism on this issue enough was enough and I wanted a little more security on the choice. Still doesn't mean Alito will be as hoped, but the odds are better. I supported Roberts, and lashed out against Coulter who STILL hasn't apologized.

As far as pessimism, practically everyone out there whether incremental, betrayed or whatever other designation of conservatism has been preaching a nightmare. I've said time and again I see a status quo! Democrats are Marxists engaged in treason, and Republicans campaigned on issues they seemingly had no intention to deliver on. they thought cnservative rhetoric was good enough to justify office. I was over at Human Events and read they plan on stressing how bad Democrats are. That's it. No policy, just scare tactiques. Be still my heart. meanwhile Grassley is skipping out on extending tax cuts for ONLY TWO YEARS to attend a meeting in his state. Any wonder people are unhappy? And yet, I see status quo not blowout.

I've said time and again they can turn this around in a couple of months. Is that pessimistic? I don't think so. It's quite rational.

These classifications of people are cute, but they don't even begin to cover every segment of people out there.


15 posted on 05/03/2006 5:19:50 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (<a href = "http://www.send-a-brick.com/brick.htm" >Be Heard: Send a Brick</A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times
I think the idea that Conservative "Purists" are at odds with Bush somehow requires people to believe that the Bush Administration has been executing well and only the "purists" are unhappy.

Uhhh... Come again. The Bush admin and Senate specifically have been a political mess since the election. Whether it be communication, execution, unity or just ideas the Bush Administration and Senate have been failing on Soc Sec, Harriet Myers, Iraq, Spending and Immigration just to name a few.

I guess I am one of those Conservative Purists that voted for Bush twice have given money to Republicans many times and now find that many Republicans have simply walked away from the parties base. I see, I am the problem.
17 posted on 05/03/2006 5:23:48 PM PDT by Garry Boldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

Great post, Logic Times! BTTT


18 posted on 05/03/2006 5:24:16 PM PDT by Chena (I'm not young enough to know everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times
I know that the Dems taking over again would be a disaster but I don't think very many of us Clinton conservatives ( real social and fiscal conservatives we were when Clinton was pres) are going to the polls on '08. Why should we? We managed to take the house, senate and presidency and got screwed.
If the congressional Rinos had fumbled the Assault Weapons Ban on to the presidents desk he would have signed it. His AG supported it. How about shake up the BATF like Rumsfeld is shaking up the DOD aimed at the Cold War. Repeal the 1968 gun control act. Build a big wall on the border and if people complain about discrimination, built one on the northern one too (probably not possible).
There are many conservative issues that have been abandoned and our representatives in congress don't give a rip because we control both houses and the oval office and don't want to make waves. The Republicans won the house, senate and the presidency because America is sick of sell out politicians serving the special interests who paid for their campaigns and serving the people who voted for them nada.
I would take a social moderate as long as he was a hard core fiscal conservative.
A lame duck in Bush's position with a plan could advance our side immeasurably. He could steam over the Democrats and get er done, but we have compromise after compromise. If Gore had won do you think he could have forced through half the big spending bills that Bush got. No way. Gore and his simpleton false environMENTAL policies would be a dud with a conservative majority in both houses like we have now. Gore would even have a hard time selling out our military and nuclear secrets because his boss already gave them all away.
We would not be fighting a war on terrorism and would have probably been attacked again.
Sorry for the rant but you're damn right the Right has been betrayed. I am a hard core conservative and have been since I was a kid debating the UPS man at my dad's store. Come '08 when the Rinos bring out the big guns (Guns, Gays and abortion) who left on our decide is going to believe them? I could never morally vote democrat but I might sit this one out. If we don't send a message we will get the standard Republican line "vote for us because we say we're better than the Democrats, how, we can't say but we are." Flame as needed guys but I'm fed up
23 posted on 05/03/2006 5:29:05 PM PDT by bbenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times; Clemenza; rmlew; firebrand; nutmeg; PARodrig; Do not dub me shapka broham; Yehuda; ...
The problem is that Conservatives have confused the Republican party and Republican candidates with conservatism. Conservatism is a movement, NOT a party. What conservatives should have been doing all along is to take over the Republican machine, instead since Reagan it has been left in the hands of the Washington corporate elite republicans who play us for suckers each and very time. It's not just winning primaries, it's taking over the local party clubs and county chairmanships and deciding who stands for office 8in the first place. What good is a primary between two RINOs who play lip service to conservatism.

The two parties have evolved a system where the two party system is entrenched, thus third parties are not an option, the left learned this long ago, so they went and took over the Democratic party. The problem is that our side hasn't figured that out yet. Unless conservatives stop bitching and moaning and take over the local apparatus and move up, we will always end up being disappointed.


CACIQUE'S RECOMENDED READING LIST
(CLICK ON ANY BOOK)


27 posted on 05/03/2006 5:32:19 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times
Ronald Reagan called Jimmy Carter "Mr. Deficit". The Republican "Contract with America" called for a Balanced Budget Amendment.

Where are those Republicans?

32 posted on 05/03/2006 5:39:24 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

Nope. The jelly-spined traitorous RINO's who sold themselves as Conservatives and abandoned those principles at the slightest bump in the road did it all to themselves.


45 posted on 05/03/2006 5:52:16 PM PDT by azhenfud (He who always is looking up seldom finds others' lost change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

A pre-emptive strike on the conservatives? What bullshit. Go ahead and blame me and others like me for the storm that the Republicans have gotten themselves into. You can also blame me for voting for Tom Tancredo. He may not be moderate enough for you CINO's.


51 posted on 05/03/2006 6:00:52 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Illegal immigration 24/7, the GOP ain't making it 24/7, Oil 24/7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times; ECM; jdm; Sybeck1; raybbr; William Terrell; azhenfud; Doe Eyes; budwiesest
The "betrayed Conservatives" are Leftist DNC mouthpieces who attended the Moveon.org seminars about "infiltrating Conservative Websites and spread dissension". Anyone who has watched the out of control Leftist Judges rape the US Constitution for the last 30 years knows why there is NO alternative to GOP control.

The "Betrayed Conservatives" are frauds. Chief Justice Roberts, Asso Justice Alito, Judges Rogers, Brown and Luttig. Game, set match and argument to the GOP. Anyone saying anything different is either a political fraud or a naive fool.

58 posted on 05/03/2006 6:05:12 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party! For people who value slogans, not solutions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times
I have found many conservatives to be nearly as irrational as the left. They just have a different set of interests and values. They will be the people who will either stay home this November or will mark a protest vote against the Republicans. This is not a mistake that many on the left make. Compare the number of votes that greenies and Nader get to those cast for Ross Perot in '92 and again in '96.

Nobody can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory nor shoot oneself in the foot with the precise accuracy that Republicans can.
59 posted on 05/03/2006 6:06:22 PM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times
Logic Times? No signs of logic evident to me.

For starters, few conservatives are GWB haters. This seems to be the typical projection that liberals use. Some conservatives see GWB as being faithful to his less than conservative political philosophy, similar to his fathers. Many conservatives are disappointed in GWB when he takes positions that are not only not conservative but are against the beliefs of most Americans, conservatives and moderates, such as his position on the invasion of illegal aliens. Neither of these groups hate the President. This is something that liberals, and some FReepers, do not seem able to understand. True conservatives are guided by their beliefs and intellect, not their feelings. They do not hate everyone that they may fight against.


The central premise of this liberal screed appears to be that there is a group of "betrayed conservatives" who emotionally destroy other "less than pure conservatives". This is ludicrous. Conservatives I know supported Newt Gingrich and Tom Delay when they supported conservative issues. Liberals, including the MSM and squishy Republicans, are the groups who wanted to destroy these conservatives and the record of this is obvious for anyone with eyes.

The tone of this article is similar to many posts I have seen on FR i.e. anyone not agreeing with the President or the latest RNC position is a "basher" or "hater" and is only aiding "Hillary" or the Democrats in their quest to get into office and destroy the Country. I have often wondered if these posts are from liberals who want to pit all non-liberals against each other. It seems that these posts are often emotional and "shrill", another projection this article uses. Even when conservative posters are logical, factual and respectful, they are called names and accused of all sort of heinous behavior. This definitely has the stench of emotional liberalism.
This article, and similar posts, never seem to have any solution other than keep voting for the Republicans who have proven they are against conservative principles. They never explain how this could possibly help get the Country back on track, but only "scream" that to do otherwise is to betray Republicans and insure total destruction by the Democrats. Fear-mongering, another liberal tactic.

Although I have often responded to these type of posts, maybe I am just being gamed. Maybe, like the author of this article, liberals are just trying to get us to buy into their alternative universe where logic is emotion, principles are naive foolishness and conservatives are the problem.
I think I will be more selective in who I post to,....nah, that would away take too much of the fun!

69 posted on 05/03/2006 6:18:05 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

So now the schmuckerheads are moving to marginalize the conservatives within the Republican Party the same way their counterparts on the other side of the isle marginalized the conservatives in the ranks of the Democratic Party.


85 posted on 05/03/2006 6:28:15 PM PDT by claudiustg (Build a fence. They won't come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

This story doesn't mention the Betrayed Conservative's cousin, the Betrayed Faux Conservative. The Betrayed Faux Conservative can be identified by certain traits, such as whining about Bush killing Iraqis when he couldn't have cared less about Clinton killing Serbians.


87 posted on 05/03/2006 6:32:06 PM PDT by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Logic Times

AHHHH! Those pics, away Satan, BE GONE, EVIL ANGELS!!!


92 posted on 05/03/2006 6:39:30 PM PDT by lonedawg (why does that rag on your head say holiday inn?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson