Posted on 08/27/2005 7:19:45 PM PDT by Former Military Chick
WASHINGTON - Old-timers could be forgiven this week if they hummed a few bars of "For What It's Worth," Buffalo Springfield's 1966 anti-war tune. The one that begins, "There's something happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear..."
The air of unreality only seemed to thicken as George W. Bush, dogged by opponents of his war in Iraq at the gates of his beloved Texas ranch, hit the road for a pair of speeches aimed at bolstering support for that war and shoring up his sagging poll numbers.
There was a time when August brought a blissful if hot and humid peace to the nation and its capital. Congress stayed home until after Labor Day, and the republic was safe for a brief spell. Presidents went golfing or drove their speedboats off Maine or even walked around Key West in coat and tie and Panama hat.
Not this week. Not during these Dog Days. A heretofore confident if not cocky White House is on the defensive and the spin patrol has been deployed in force to tell America that this is no time to think about quitting the fight against the evildoers in Iraq. No time to think about getting our troops out of the quicksand that's taken the lives of 1,873 young Americans.
Bush stopped in Salt Lake City to speak to a friendly VFW convention, but he sounded for all the world as if he were talking directly to Cindy Sheehan, an anti-war mother whose son was killed in Iraq whom he refuses to see and whom some of his acolytes on talk radio and cable TV have trashed. Bush did meet Sheehan once soon after her son was killed.
The president expressed sympathy for the families of those killed in the two and a half years of a war that the majority of Americans no longer think he's managing well.
For those who wonder how much longer the war might continue, Army chief of staff Gen. Peter Schoomaker said he's now planning rotations of soldiers and Marines four years out -- 2007 to 2009, should they still be needed then.
Even amateur practitioners of the art of public relations said that if the president had just invited Sheehan in for a sympathetic talk, a cup of coffee and a hug all of this might have been postponed, at least for a while.
Where was his spinmeister Karl Rove? What were they thinking? When the White House did react, it was to set in motion a counter-demonstration of pro-war Republicans assigned to show the flag in Crawford and the ranch, and another group to patrol Sheehan's home state of California.
After a Republican maverick, Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, said it was time to begin thinking about how to get out of Iraq, Bush counselor Dan Bartlett was dispatched to make the rounds of network and cable talk shows to say that Bush did, too, have a strategy, and it was a sound one. Even Fox News was skeptical.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld pooh-poohed any thought that civil war was imminent in Iraq while Iraqi Shiite Muslims and Kurds drafted a new constitution over the objections of the Sunni minority who've fueled and manned the insurgency from the beginning.
The defense czar, who earlier was caught using a machine to sign his name to letters of condolence to the families of service members who died in Iraq, declared that anyone in his position "has to feel a great deal of empathy" for those who've lost loved ones in the war.
Those of us who are old enough have seen this movie before were reminded of other presidents, Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard M. Nixon, who were haunted by another war and dogged by war protesters and a nation that lost confidence in their leadership and wound up divided against itself.
Will history remember this week as the tipping point for George W. Bush and the Republicans who control Congress? Can they stay the course as they head into mid-term elections next year?
One more question: Will our children and grandchildren and their children harvest a bitter crop of budget deficits, higher oil prices, Islamic militancy and a broken Army and Marine Corps that was seeded in Iraq by this president, his vice president and his secretary of defense?
Will that bitter harvest, not a cakewalk, a mission accomplished and a Mesopotamian march of democracy, be Bush's legacy?
This ain't Vietnam, no matter how much the anti-war crowd wants to relive those days.
Mr. Galloway seems to sound no different from the rest of the MSM, as if his gluteal chapeau is much too tight. I wondered why his opinion should carry any more weight than anyone else's-- is he a retired general, a tactician, a scholar? No, it turns out he's a war correspondent, just like Andy Rooney was, like Walter Cronkhite was, like Peter Jennings and Dan Rather were.
Any relation to George Galloway of the U.K.? They sound alike...
Military.com, has become a hangout for antiwar idiot's.
Yeah, I thought the MP/SoB came over to Cindy Sheetheads camp, too....yet another "chicken little"....
He has been anti Iraq for a long time it seems, see:
http://www.military.com/NewContent/0,13190,Galloway_Index,00.html
Well I can see that view point, it attracts the likes of Oliver North as well.
Joe's take on things seems a bit faulty. Half of Vietnam was off limits to offensive ground actions, a much larger portion of the Viet population supported the commies, and the military was not allowed to run the show. I see these as being the most important points for a successful conclusion. The difference between Iraq and Vietnam in re these points is GIANT.
I think old Joe has gone over to the dark side on this issue. His judgement is clouded by something(?) if he can say that the Sheehan woman would have been even temporarily placated by "a cup of coffee and a hug." He appears to be about as objective as that other journo Helen Thomas.
Co-author of WE WERE SOLDIERS ONCE AND YOUNG with Hal Moore. Generally respected by military types for his respect of soldiers and getting into the field to get the story.
Like many others so impacted by Vietnam, he's seeing things through the wrong lense.
Oliver North has alot better viewpoint.
.
JOE GALLOWAY = Co-Author
..'WE WERE SOLDIERS ONCE and YOUNG'
http://www.lzxray.com/guyer_set1.htm
Joseph L. Galloway is the senior military correspondent for Knight Ridder Newspapers and a nationally syndicated columnist. One of America's preeminent war correspondents, with more than four decades as a reporter and writer, he recently concluded an assignment as a special consultant to Gen. Colin Powell at the State Department.
Galloway, a native of Refugio, Texas, spent 22 years as a foreign and war correspondent and bureau chief for United Press International, and nearly 20 years as a senior editor and senior writer for U.S. News & World Report magazine. His overseas postings include tours in Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Singapore and three years as UPI bureau chief in Moscow in the former Soviet Union. During the course of 15 years of foreign postings Galloway served four tours as a war correspondent in Vietnam and also covered the 1971 India-Pakistan War and half a dozen other combat operations.
In 1990-1991 Galloway covered Desert Shield/Desert Storm, riding with the 24th Infantry Division (Mech) in the assault into Iraq. General H. Norman Schwarzkopf has called Galloway "The finest combat correspondent of our generation -- a soldier's reporter and a soldier's friend."
Tell the General a lot changes in 13 years...this guy's no Ernie Pyle.
Read American Solider by Tommy Franks, He has very little respect for Schwarzkopf.
Iraq and Afghanistan are part of the WOT. UBL declared war on the United States in 1996. BIN LADEN'S FATWA: "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places."
Thank you for that endorsement will order the book tomorrow.
I prefer Michael Yon ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.