Skip to comments.
CBS Statement Expect Today (Per FOX news)
FOX NEWS
| 09/15/2004
Posted on 09/15/2004 4:37:57 AM PDT by tsmith130
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 861-869 next last
To: tsmith130
Did Sandy Berger make a delivery?
41
posted on
09/15/2004 5:03:57 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: mewzilla
Did Sandy Berger make a delivery? I always thought it was called a "deposit".
42
posted on
09/15/2004 5:05:39 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(C-BS, w/Dan Blather - the official network and anchor of the Clintonistas and Ketchup/Breck)
To: tsmith130
what time are they supose to make the statment?
To: tsmith130
I know -- they're going to report that, after pressuring their unimpeachable source, the source confessed that the memos were indeed fake, and has now provided them with the real typewritten memos.
44
posted on
09/15/2004 5:07:22 AM PDT
by
cpurick
(Awww, this thread's too good! Now I have to go change my pajamas.)
To: Jalapeno
Withdrawing the story implies that it is false or else there is no other reason to withdraw it. If it is false, you don't have to protect a source that's given you bogus information. They should be nailed for that if that's the tactic they use.
45
posted on
09/15/2004 5:07:50 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: steveegg
Well, what goes in must come out, eh? Euw.
Seriously, if CBS doesn't miraculously come up with some back-up docs, color me surprised. Things must be really bad if they go for a modified limited hang-out. They must be really worried about someone finding out where those docs came from. Which would make me even more suspicious of the source.
46
posted on
09/15/2004 5:08:53 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok
They didn't say...only said "this morning".
47
posted on
09/15/2004 5:09:16 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
To: snopercod
Common sense approach would be to admit the docs are forgeries while standing by the basic premise of the story. Unfortunately for CBS, that would lead to incredible pressure to reveal their sources. Dan just can't bring himself to deep six the Kerry Campaign even to save the shreds of his own credibility.
48
posted on
09/15/2004 5:09:33 AM PDT
by
Callahan
To: tsmith130
Hah! They can't wait until Friday! They give up!
49
posted on
09/15/2004 5:09:35 AM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: tsmith130
CBS' statement:
50
posted on
09/15/2004 5:09:43 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Yes, there's still time to buy my book.)
To: Agent Smith
"The Internet bloggers picked CBS's story as clean as a school of piranhas would pick clean some poor water buffalo that wandered into their river."
From another article. Evidently, Dangerous Dan Blather has no idea he's been caught, cleaned, and fried.
51
posted on
09/15/2004 5:10:01 AM PDT
by
gunnygail
(Founding member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. (I operate the minigun, more fun):.)
To: cpurick
Oh goodness, ya' think they will try that!
(answer)YES!!
lol
I can not wait to hear what manure they will be spreading today.
To: mewzilla
Seriously, if CBS doesn't miraculously come up with some back-up docs, color me surprised. I'll put money on the "back-ups" not looking much like the "originals".
53
posted on
09/15/2004 5:10:26 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(C-BS, w/Dan Blather - the official network and anchor of the Clintonistas and Ketchup/Breck)
To: tsmith130
They can't even wait until tomorrow, when the hurricane hits. THAT would distract from the story.
54
posted on
09/15/2004 5:11:22 AM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: coconutt2000
55
posted on
09/15/2004 5:11:47 AM PDT
by
saveliberty
(Liberal= in need of therapy, but would rather ruin lives of those less fortunate to feel good)
To: tsmith130
My understanding is that they will reveal the Kitty Kelly has vouched for the authenticity of the documents.
To: steveegg
Well, it takes a while to find matches for 30 year old paper and ink.
57
posted on
09/15/2004 5:13:03 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: tsmith130
Their only way out at this point is tho cry "hoax" and claim they were duped. Pin it on Burkett and low level Texas Dems. Try to avoid any connection to DNC & K/E Campaign. It still looks bad on CBS, but not as bad as admitting purposeful deception on their part.
58
posted on
09/15/2004 5:15:02 AM PDT
by
vrwinger
(Tagline? I don't need no stinkin' TAGLINE!)
To: tsmith130
heh, they're being nailed right now....
59
posted on
09/15/2004 5:15:02 AM PDT
by
Jalapeno
To: Jalapeno
Yeah, but I want railroad spikes...not nails!!!
60
posted on
09/15/2004 5:16:21 AM PDT
by
tsmith130
("Some folks look at me and see a certain swagger, which in Texas is called "walking."" - GWB)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 861-869 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson