Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SOUTH KOREAN STATEMENT ON IRAQ HOSTAGE DEATH
Reuters ^ | 6/22/04

Posted on 06/22/2004 1:27:23 PM PDT by areafiftyone

SEOUL, June 23 (Reuters) - South Korea's National Security Council, which advises President Roh Moo-hyun, met on Wednesday to discuss the killing by Muslim militants of a South Korean hostage in Iraq.

The Council's standing committee issued the following statement after the meeting:

(Translation by Reuters. About 180 words)

1. The government strongly condemns the killing of Kim Sun-il by a terrorist group in Iraq as an inhumane act of terror.

2. The government decided to ask for cooperation with the Iraqi interim government and coalition forces to resolve the incident and push for the early repatriation of the victim's body.

3. The government decided to direct the work of the task force in Iraq to resolve the incident in cooperation with resident embassy staff and decided to form and operate a joint management committee for this.

4. The government has decided to strengthen safety measures to prevent similar incidents and to seek the early withdrawal all South Korean civilian residents, excluding essential personnel.

5. Our government's basic spirit and position has not changed. We confirm that again because our troop deployment is for reconstruction and humanitarian aid support for Iraq.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; kimsunil; southkorea; statement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/22/2004 1:27:26 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

"4. The government has decided to strengthen safety measures to prevent similar incidents and to seek the early withdrawal all South Korean civilian residents, excluding essential personnel."

When the going gets tough, run.


2 posted on 06/22/2004 1:31:03 PM PDT by TFL-Thumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper
5. Our government's basic spirit and position has not changed. We confirm that again because our troop deployment is for reconstruction and humanitarian aid support for Iraq.

I think this is a righteous response to the atrocity. I don't fault the S Koreans for removing non essential personnel.

3 posted on 06/22/2004 1:35:49 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper

If I were them, I'd step up the military force to show strength.


4 posted on 06/22/2004 1:36:59 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper

I think it's a common-sense measure...

The soldiers will be coming, anyway.


5 posted on 06/22/2004 1:40:19 PM PDT by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

The South Korean Military has some real kick butt and take no name types in its ranks. Perhaps they will have an opertunity to demonstrate their skills in dispatching the enemy. Just a shame these bad guys don't live in a jungle.


6 posted on 06/22/2004 1:40:20 PM PDT by JamesA ( The more you try to change my convictions the more resolved I am to keep them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I'd like to see:

6. We've decided to increase the number of troops we are sending to Irag to 10,000 including the nastiest hard-core commandos in Korea... all armed with big frickin knives that are perfect for cutting off rag heads.

7 posted on 06/22/2004 1:42:01 PM PDT by PrivateIdaho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

I wonder what responses they aren't telling us about. I wouldn't be surprised if the bodies of some dead terrorists were found in the next week or so.


8 posted on 06/22/2004 1:42:56 PM PDT by Pete (Clinton was and continues to be a sociopath. http://www.home.datawest.net/esn-recovery/artcls/socio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PrivateIdaho

We've decided to increase the number of troops we are sending to Irag to 10,000 and they will be bringing a double-00 ass kicking with them when they come.


9 posted on 06/22/2004 1:44:40 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper
Removal of civilian personnel isn't exactly "running." In fact, the most effective means of dealing with this sh!t is to shut down all civilian operations (hospitals, water facilities, food convoys, etc.) and let several thousand soldiers roam about the countryside.

I know it sounds coldhearted to blame the victim here, but any civilian who stayed in Iraq (or anywhere else in the Middle East, for that matter) after the Nick Berg incident really should have had a psychiatric exam.

10 posted on 06/22/2004 1:46:47 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
One of my best friends in the world is a S Korean girl whom I met when she was attending college here.(I'm just about to send her note expressing my condolences) She is from Pusan too and just a few years younger than this man. My heart goes out to his family, and I thank the S Koreans for their support in Iraq. They are good people!
11 posted on 06/22/2004 1:47:14 PM PDT by Dysart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
If I were them, I'd step up the military force to show strength.

Essentially you are right. For every hostage taken, the appropriate government should very visibly send 50 additional troops to Iraq. If a hostage is executed, send another 100. You must make hostage taking visibly counter productive to the hostage takers. Increasing security measures and evacuating personnel sends the message that the hostage takers a hitting a nerve.

12 posted on 06/22/2004 2:07:39 PM PDT by CMAC51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

I agree with the above but by a factor of 10 or even 100!


13 posted on 06/22/2004 2:20:33 PM PDT by freethinkingman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CMAC51

I'd be more specific in my military tactics - for every beheading, BLOW UP A MOSQUE~ Tell them if they take any hostages, we send in an F16 to blow up the biggest Mosque and list them one by one in order of importance! And don't just limit them to Iraq either! IT IS A HOLY WAR and we're the only ones NOT fighting it THAT WAY!


14 posted on 06/22/2004 2:21:17 PM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper
When the going gets tough, run.

U.S. State Dept reccommends the same thing. Of course they are amoungst Bush's worst enemies. Most of Washington runs on leaks from these career mostly morons.

15 posted on 06/22/2004 2:25:09 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper
When the going gets tough, run.

They are sending the additional 3000 troops. I don't think I'd call that running.

16 posted on 06/22/2004 2:37:34 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JamesA
st a shame these bad guys don't live in a jungle.

Why? The ROKs had adapt to the jungle of Vietnam, (no jungles in Korea, in fact the winters are pretty harsh, especially in the north). They will adapt to the dessert and urban areas of Iraq.

17 posted on 06/22/2004 2:40:06 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper

Withdrawing "NON ESSENTIAL" personel is your idea of running?


18 posted on 06/22/2004 2:40:29 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper
When the going gets tough, run.

When the going gets tough, post brave comments on an Internet forum sitting on an American obese ass in an easy chair. Anonymously, of course.

19 posted on 06/22/2004 2:45:35 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TFL-Thumper

The U.S. embassy has essentially done the same thing, asking all civilians to leave. This happen after Nick Berg


20 posted on 06/22/2004 2:48:17 PM PDT by Military family member (Proud Pacers fan...still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson