To: areafiftyone
"4. The government has decided to strengthen safety measures to prevent similar incidents and to seek the early withdrawal all South Korean civilian residents, excluding essential personnel."
When the going gets tough, run.
To: TFL-Thumper
5. Our government's basic spirit and position has not changed. We confirm that again because our troop deployment is for reconstruction and humanitarian aid support for Iraq. I think this is a righteous response to the atrocity. I don't fault the S Koreans for removing non essential personnel.
3 posted on
06/22/2004 1:35:49 PM PDT by
skeeter
To: TFL-Thumper
If I were them, I'd step up the military force to show strength.
4 posted on
06/22/2004 1:36:59 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: TFL-Thumper
I think it's a common-sense measure...
The soldiers will be coming, anyway.
5 posted on
06/22/2004 1:40:19 PM PDT by
El Conservador
("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
To: TFL-Thumper
Removal of civilian personnel isn't exactly "running." In fact, the most effective means of dealing with this sh!t is to shut down all civilian operations (hospitals, water facilities, food convoys, etc.) and let several thousand soldiers roam about the countryside.
I know it sounds coldhearted to blame the victim here, but any civilian who stayed in Iraq (or anywhere else in the Middle East, for that matter) after the Nick Berg incident really should have had a psychiatric exam.
10 posted on
06/22/2004 1:46:47 PM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
To: TFL-Thumper
When the going gets tough, run. U.S. State Dept reccommends the same thing. Of course they are amoungst Bush's worst enemies. Most of Washington runs on leaks from these career mostly morons.
15 posted on
06/22/2004 2:25:09 PM PDT by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
To: TFL-Thumper
When the going gets tough, run. They are sending the additional 3000 troops. I don't think I'd call that running.
16 posted on
06/22/2004 2:37:34 PM PDT by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: TFL-Thumper
Withdrawing "NON ESSENTIAL" personel is your idea of running?
18 posted on
06/22/2004 2:40:29 PM PDT by
onyx
To: TFL-Thumper
When the going gets tough, run. When the going gets tough, post brave comments on an Internet forum sitting on an American obese ass in an easy chair. Anonymously, of course.
19 posted on
06/22/2004 2:45:35 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
To: TFL-Thumper
The U.S. embassy has essentially done the same thing, asking all civilians to leave. This happen after Nick Berg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson