Posted on 07/01/2015 9:59:07 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
In the U.S., liberty is a cherished ideal dating back to at least the Boston Tea Party, and both major parties have tried to claim its mantle. But the Republican Party has been more successful at it in recent decades, starting with Ronald Reagan's election in 1980. That election ushered in the GOP as we know it today — anti-tax, anti-spending, anti-regulation, aggressive on foreign policy — and marks the point at which conservatives were able to convince Americans that their ideas were boons to freedom.
Last week, the balance finally shifted, after national Democrats almost universally embraced the Supreme Court's decision recognizing a constitutional right to same-sex marriage and national Republicans almost universally denounced it. On balance, the Democrats are now the party of freedom and liberty.
How did this happen? Let's start with something relatively anodyne: trains and buses. Before 1980, Republicans had emphasized their support for public transportation, Marc Fisher noted in The Washington Post in 2012, in an examination of more than 50 years of GOP presidential platforms. In 1980, the Republican platform included this rhetorical and policy pivot: "Republicans reject the elitist notion that Americans must be forced out of their cars. Instead, we vigorously support the right of personal mobility and freedom as exemplified by the automobile."
President Richard Nixon proudly ushered in the Environmental Protection Agency and signed the Clean Water Act, but seven years after he left office in disgrace, his party declared "war on government overregulation."
By the time the Tea Party appropriated the mantle of liberty in the long, hot summer of 2009, "freedom" meant no government intervention in banking, the housing market, and auto company collapses; less government in health care markets; fewer gun ownership restrictions; and — as one origin story for the name Tea Party suggests — fewer taxes, since the Tea Partiers felt Taxed Enough Already.
Since Reagan, Democrats have generally been seen as the party of Big Government. And Big Government has been increasingly unpopular since the Reagan revolution, according to Gallup:
Big Government hit a first big low point under Bill Clinton, about the time Clinton declared that "the era of Big Government is over" in 1996. But Democrats weren't always the party of Big Government.
In the 1860s, Abraham Lincoln's Republican Party was the party that promoted a strong, activist federal government, and the Democrats pushed for limiting the central government's role, says political scientist Eric Rauchway at The Chronicle of Higher Education. When William Jennings Bryan became the Democratic standard-bearer in 1896, the party started embracing a larger central government, and the Republicans didn't take the opposite side until around Franklin Roosevelt's first re-election in 1936, in the thick of his New Deal.
Under John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, things got muddled, freedom-wise. The federal government increasingly sided with black Americans fighting for basic civil rights, mandating freedom through government intervention. The New Deal gave way to the Great Society, notably Medicare. Americans got a new payroll tax, but also freedom from abject poverty in their golden years.
And as the post-Nixon Republican Party started advocating for fewer taxes and less regulation, the socially conservative wing of the party started pushing for curtailed personal liberties. In 1976, the GOP platform said the party was split on the issue of abortion rights, calling it "undoubtedly a moral and personal issue," Fisher noted at The Washington Post. But by 1980 the platform was pushing for a constitutional amendment outlawing abortion.
The 1992 platform is when social conservatives really got traction. It was the first one to mention same-sex relationships, solidly rejecting not only gay marriage but also adoption and foster parenting by gay couples. It also sought to limit choices in entertainment, claiming that "the media, the entertainment industry, academia, and the Democrat [sic] Party are waging a guerrilla war against American values."
After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the GOP took another step back from personal liberties, pushing through the Patriot Act and instituting covert domestic surveillance practices that only came to light near the end of Bush's second term. Under Bush, the TSA got a lot more invasive and particular before you could board an airplane. No Child Left Behind did a lot to shrink or eliminate children's free time at school in favor of more standardized testing.
So, here we are, nearing the end of Obama's second term. Let's tally the score.
When it comes to liberty, Democrats generally favor the freedom for gay people to get married, a less invasive national security/surveillance state, greater choice regarding abortion and contraception, loosened marijuana laws, less restrictive voting laws, less censorship of popular entertainment, more freedom of movement for immigrants, and stronger workplace protections to encourage freedom of leisure time (or fair compensation for giving it up).
For Republicans, liberty generally looks like fewer taxes, less restrictive gun laws, less censorship of political or "hate" speech, less regulation of markets, less regulation of business, more freedom to choose between K-12 schools (with government vouchers), fewer restrictions on money in politics, and the freedom to not have health insurance or to opt for minimalist coverage.
And that's just if you keep score by the libertarian handbook. How do you count freedom from fear of medical bankruptcy, though, or fear of harassment by people who antagonize women or minorities? Or how about the liberty to pray in public schools or the freedom to refuse to serve a customer you don't approve of based on sexual orientation? Are breathing clean air and drinking clean water essential freedoms? How about inexpensive gas?
FDR, the godfather of the Democratic shift to Big Government solutions, outlined four basic, universal freedoms in a 1941 speech, and along with the freedom of speech and freedom of worship he included freedom from want and freedom from fear.
So here's what tips the balance for me. When you look at the freedoms Republicans proffer, they tend to be economic, often favoring businesses or individual material needs. Money and guns are a type of freedom, but they pale compared to personal liberty, like marrying the person you love or trusting that police officers can't harass or harm you with impunity because of the color of your skin.
To put it another way, Democrats want to let you be the person you are and Republicans want to get the government out of your wallet. Freedom is not, as Kris Kristofferson* wrote, another word for nothing left to lose. It's the liberty to be yourself, make your own decisions, and enjoy a reasonable measure of privacy and a reasonable hope for safety. Today, in 2015, the party that comes closer to that ideal is the Democratic Party.
*[Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly suggested that Willie Nelson wrote the song "Me and Bobby McGee," not Kris Kristofferson.]
"War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength".
Got it...
Libertarians and liberals.
“On balance, the Democrats are now the party of freedom and liberty.”
Yes, ask the Christians, the Southerners, the small business owners, conservatives in colleges - they feel totally liberated, I’m sure.
In your libtard imagination, moron.
Freedom to sodomize little boys on the high altar of St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York?
Freedom to fellate each other in public parks and beach areas?
Yeah, that's freedom, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were all about that.
“On balance, the Democrats are now the party of freedom and liberty.”
As they hold a gun to a preacher’s head, forcing him to marry some homosexual couple, yelling at him, saying, “You effin’ bigot.”
Yup, that’s freedom. That’s class. That’s love.
Not.
Empty libhole demonicrats have truly lost it.
This has been going on since 1928, ever since the Democrats figured that in future all they needed was the big-city mobs and machines. They walked away from the South. There were a lot of issues like lynching and Jim Crow that helped drive the Dems away from the Southern populists ..... but most of all it was northern liberal Media and its drift to the left, as more and more socialist-leaning J-school grads began driving the whole institution to the left (with NKVD/KGB infiltration of the J-schools helping), that gradually demonized the whole South (and heterosexuals, and conservative Catholics, and .... well, who ya got? Dick Nixon?).
I’d be more interested in Peter Weber explaining the difference between the new democrat and the old communist.
Taking away Christian Freedom is the Marxist definition of liberty.
Pray America is waking
Sorry fascists, it doesn’t work that way.
Then he uses that as support for a general calumny against "social conservatives", who are totally not in either the platform's writing or the snarkfest at the WaPo.
Classic. Lie about people, quote other people, and then pretend you've supported your statement.
Because nothing says “liberty” like sticking your Johnson up some little boy’s anus.
Not liberty license, for perversion.
Democrats are the party of license, not liberty.
Party of perversion. Liberty isnt for perversion.
I am against the freedom of cultural terrorists. If that makes me a statist, then fine. I consider the Left worse and more dangerous than Al Qaeda. PERIOD
On balance, the Democrats are now the party of freedom and liberty
PUKE......
The Party of up is down and wrong is right..
“War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength and Obama loves America”.
So here’s what tips the balance for me. When you look at the freedoms Republicans proffer, they tend to be economic, often favoring businesses or individual material needs. Money and guns are a type of freedom, but they pale compared to personal liberty, like marrying the person you love or trusting that police officers can’t harass or harm you with impunity because of the color of your skin.
To put it another way, Democrats want to let you be the person you are and Republicans want to get the government out of your wallet.
___________________________________________________________
I find it fascinating how people can define freedom in such different ways. This whole right v left thinking .... so different .... and neither side understands *why* the other side believes what they believe.
I also find it interesting and scary how the pendulum swings in what I view a fairly quick amount of time. From same sex relations and Obamacare ... the American public is proving to be quite fickle in what they *say* they believe.
The Democrat candidates should take this time of achieving liberty topromise that the VP nomination will be LGBTQ.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.