El rushbo shilling for the gop. Again. He hears the frustration but by gosh can’t support leaving that gop plantation. No way. The gop can’t be defeated! What we have to do is change the gop!
In a way, I actually agree with his premise. The gop as a wing of the uniparty probably can’t be defeated. His conclusion, though, is completely wrong. Trying to wrest control over the gop wing of the uniparty is a fool’s errand. The uniparty has been crushing upstart challengers for the last 150 years. They’re very, very good at it. There’s no reason to believe today’s conservatives are going to be any more successful than those in the past.
The logical solution, although you’ll never hear it out of the all feeling, all knowing, all self-absorbed maharushie...is to not waste your time and efforts playing a suckers game. If you want freedom and liberty, you aren’t going to find it in electoral politics.
Mark Levin is similar. Yesterday, he was 1 inch away from dumping the GOP. Close, but not quite there.
==
Conservatives need to wake up. They have been using that same ‘change from inside’ argument since the Lott/Frist/Hastert era. And they still haven’t made much headway.
In fact, they have sort of lost ground, as Boehner gave the chairmanships to his cronies and moderates. Look for McConnell to do similar.
RUSH: Well, I tell you what. I am hearing from people who heretofore have sworn off third-party. "No way, Rush. That's a sucker's bet...."
Ironic, since the strategic solution to that sucker's bet is to vote for a Republican president whose documented record proved him squarely on board with five major Democrat tyrannical agendas: government run health care, legal and subsidized abortion, forced "rights" to accommodate open homosexuals, environmentalist control over food and energy production to "save the planet," and activist left-leaning judges, not to mention gun control.
It's a fact, you can look it up. IT WAS A SUCKER'S BET to vote for the guy, Rush!!! Helloooooooooo?????????
*sigh*
You are exactly right, true common sense: Trying to wrest control over the gop wing of the uniparty is a fool’s errand. The uniparty has been crushing upstart challengers for the last 150 years. They’re very, very good at it. There’s no reason to believe today’s conservatives are going to be any more successful than those in the past.
RUSH says: Elections are not quite that simple.
Too smart by half. A vote for Cochran was a vote for a lying traitorous cockroach to represent Republicans. It was quite that simple, and so are the consequences.
RUSH says: I still think taking over the Republican Party is better.
Oh, really! From someone who lives in Realville? Or Wishville?
RUSH: I mean, the Republican Party is not all conservative voters.
"Conservative" as in "use government conservatively, as in limited government," or "conservative" as in "use government to enforce Christian morality"? It seems clear to me that the less government, the more freedom people have to thrive within the Judeo Christian structure; government usurping Christian staples such as charity (entitlement welfare) and the right to civilly reject open homosexuality is what has lead to most of America's moral malaise. It's against the law to "live" Christian, half the time.
Who are "conservative voters," Rush? True conservatism -- that is, advocacy for the LIMITED USE, the conservative use of government, unites MORAL Americans who yearn to be free and to thrive.
Rush is going to be in a very hard place if the GOP moves ahead as scheduled and nominates another Romney.
Where you going to find it?
Nice rant, hotshot. So what IS "the logical solution?" You "forgot" to say.