Posted on 01/25/2002 1:14:16 AM PST by Mercuria
Name dropping is normally meant to define the use of one's alleged nearness, dearness even, to someone oh-so-much more famous and fabulous, making the user oh-so-much more famous and fabulous by the association. The key is, normally, in using it in a pseudo-innocuous way, as in, "Well, yesterday at lunch, when I told that joke, Cher almost choked on her chili."
The media employs it as well; knowing full well that a cleavage shot of J. Lo in Versace sells more copies than an aerial of Ari Fleischer any day of the week. But that's not the thrust of this page.
Name dropping, the kind that's unfortunately more nefarious, either literally drops, as in fails to include, a disclaimer, or pops one in when none is needed. A kind of "just in case you the reader won't see this the way we do", a kind of
Multi-Level Monikering for Malleable Minds
If the media is going to talk of someone not so readily known, a definer is helpful in shaping, pre-gauging what one's reaction should be to the character about to be introduced. If sympathy is absolutely not wanted the simple use of words like "conservative-" or "right-wing-" before someone's actual name usually suffices as a "ignore all that follows" indicator. A lack of definition is employed to confer the illusion of impartiality (but usually when "rabid-Commie-sympathizer-" would be more honest).
White Separatist, Black Motorist
The two most famous uses of the add-on disclaimer flowed rather freely in the 90s. A Google search of "white separatist Randy Weaver" logs in 1400 hits. The use of these adjectives was meant (and successfully, too) to excuse anything that might have happened to this man or anyone unfortunate enough to be part of his family. Even in articles that, with chagrin, noted that the government had to eventually pay him millions for their egregious use of entrapment and force, the definers remained in place. Poor Mr. Weaver, had he been a "minority" seeking to live in areas of other "people of varying degrees of color" he would have been simply searching for "ethnic identity". Instead his heartless racism more than exacerbated the tolerance of authorities, it legitimized their force and justifiably precluded any sympathy from We The Peasants.
A Google search of "black motorist Rodney King" brings in an impressive 1700 hits. This adjective usage was designed to conjure up the sinless act of Driving While Black. It helped to blur the line of Driving Uncontrollably While Under The Influence Of Enraging Controlled Substances. It was meant to provoke sympathy and erase culpability.
Did the LAPD use excessive force? Absolutely. But Mr. King was much luckier than Mr. Weaver, not just in life (not to mention at a loss of it) but also on the printed page.
SLA: as in the Shoebomber, the Left-Wing Loony, the Anti-American
I was very happy to read, last week, that Richard Reid will actually be charged with attempting to blow up a plane. For a long time, he was simply an attempted "shoe-bomber", and guilty (perhaps) of "interfering with the flight crew". Yep, attempting to change the course of a plane from trans-Atlantic to nosedive could be considered interference. But how about "attempted plane bomber" instead? I mean, he might have hated his shoes enough to blow them up, but most people just go out and buy themselves a new pair, or take them off before the BOOM. Perhaps he wanted to pull a Wiley Coyote ACME-upgrade and get himself to Florida faster? But perhaps not. I guess Attempted Murderer of 220-odd Innocents just doesn't have quite the same ring to it.
Not to mention that in the first day or so after his capture two Arab-sounding names were given as aliases for him. Just like the now forgotten Arab-sounding alias of the Anti-American we'll get to in a moment. Only some people who change their names have the old ones dropped. Literally, that is, by the media.
Which brings us to the Left-Wing Loony, Kathleen Soliah. Oh, sorry, it's Sara Jane Olson now, a sweet mom from Minnesota, not another bungled bomber with "Die, America, die" on the mind. I add the Left-Wing disclaimer, by the way, because I've never seen it used in print next to her name. And, like most attempted murderers, she'll get a bit of a pass for failing. Failing at trying to kill gets a lesser sentence than the success, a "be kinder to the less-equipped" attitude, like social promotion at the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Besides, she was young at the time, like JohnnyJihadWalkerLindh, our anti-American of the moment. A letter writer to my local rag stated that young Mr. Walker was only trying to exercise his freedom of religion by moving to the -Stans of the East. Which belief, of course, is only aided by the fact that the media calls him "American Talib" as opposed to "Al Qaeda Upstart And Basker-In-The-Presence Of Master Bin Laden".
Rebel Yell
Last year I wrote a column on Eminem (and nobody in the media calls him "Marshall"), an attempt to understand his underlying ethos and to explain, but not excuse, it.
However, the one thing that may truly explain the Tali-Boy's rebellion seems to be the only thing one can fail to mention. That his father may have pulled a "Daddy's New Roommate" and left the happy homestead for another man. And while perhaps in the fairy-tale land of children's stories this life-change may have a happy ending, it might not when test-driven in reality. The offspring of such selfishness may find themselves emotionally feeling as beat up as a black motorist at the hands of a pile of angry white baton-wielders.
Having one's parents split up is always painful. And thinking of one's parents as sexual creatures is always disconcerting. Even when Society is telling you over and over that "They're OK, You're OK". A young-coming-into-his-own-man just might reject all that contributed to the philosophy behind what must have been a heart-wrenchingly painful realization. One might desperately search for a world where that pain is, at least in theory, forbidden to occur, a standard so rigid that the shattering of a child's dreams of unity is shattered by the stones of retribution.
That wouldn't excuse it. But it might explain it.
But let's not bring it up, lest it be true. The homosexual proclivities of members of the Free World must be bathed in the light of Nature and Liberty, not of bondage to Self or desecration of Peace. The agenda is only at work when it might work.
The provisos of the press are for contributing to the disharmony, not for the edification of the unenlightened. The placebo of prefacing people with labels, or lack thereof, is for the Common Good, lest peasants become People and begin to judge for themselves.
Mercurial Times exclusive commentary. All reprints must credit the author and Mercurial Times.
Ah, er, golly willikers, Ms. AZ, you certainly do write well.
Oh, never mind.
(Got anything better to do yourself this oily in da mawnin' than naggin' at me, Auntie? LOL!!)
;-)
I had to read this three times. The first was for meaning. The second was to make sure I had interpreted it correctly. The final time was in appreciation.
Beautiful work.
You put some oh-so-famous syndicated columnists to shame, by the way! I ain't kiddin', and that's fer true!
Much luv to you and Merc and all Z-Pingers!
I'm goin' ta bed now!!
;-}
Guys, YEP!! But, "they ain't biased!" Yeah right. O'kay fine. GOOD article. Peace and love, George.
Morning bump
Oh, and thanks for the ping, Miz Merc.
stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.