Point is, why would anyone expect it to be Masoretic or Aramaic? Regardless, since the tablets are not available for study (and there have been those who have sought the broken tablets as definitive proof of their identification of the real Mt Sinai), this is merely something to wonder about.
Why are there pics on Google images, and many of them, and pics in a Bible reference section, and who knows how many others, of Masoretic Text being shown on two tablets?
Secondly, Greek was used for the NT but that doesn’t make it a holy language and since Masoretic Text, Aramaic Hebrew, and Paleo Hebrew werent used on the two tablets, how can they be considered holy languages? The holy language would be on the two tablets.
It stands to reason that a continuity would be established and that the Torah written by Moses with God giving it to him would be written in the same language.
Or does any seriously think Moses was learned in Masoretic Text, Aramaic Hebrew or Paleo Hebrew way back then. I mean, seriously...