Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK Prime Minister: ‘Important’ that ‘experts’ decided Alfie Evans’ fate
LifeSite News ^ | May 1, 2018 | Calvin Freiburger

Posted on 05/01/2018 5:55:32 PM PDT by ebb tide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: ebb tide

Disgusting. She is a Tory? Maggie must be rolling over in her grave.

Is UKIP dead in Britain now?


21 posted on 05/01/2018 11:55:16 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

This why we broke away from the Brits. Tyranny!


22 posted on 05/02/2018 2:41:51 AM PDT by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Britain has a uniparty, too. And lacks a written constitution that protects the citizenry from its government.


23 posted on 05/02/2018 3:06:12 AM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Christian legal group that helped the family is now under review by the government. This, according to The Guardian. The “conservative” Daily Telegraph is barely covering this story.


24 posted on 05/02/2018 3:52:55 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

She’s a statist. Believes that the government should have all power over its subjects.


25 posted on 05/02/2018 4:09:19 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Doing more of what fails is the definition of liberalism and insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

In the middle ages they called these types of experts “executioners”. They were considered experts at what they did too.


26 posted on 05/02/2018 5:31:42 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The terrible fallacy of appointed “experts” and worse than that is the many actions in many western societies that people have been convinced they must concede to such “experts”. It is the fallacy that the progressive regulatory state has been built on.

By what rational basis does any sane person believe that by mere appointment as “expert” the person automatically obtains the highest, best, only superior opinion on something?

Why is it ever defended, because they are defending the “experts”? No. It is defended because they are defending the state and state power to control events.

If it were a private hospital Alfie’s family could have said “we are taking our son elsewhere”. But once their son was the medical-property of the state, that could only be done with the state’s consent, and to do that the state would have to admit there are good opinions other than it’s own.


27 posted on 05/02/2018 5:55:10 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson