Sholom Rubashkin is Factually Innocent

For my dear friends who have embraced darkness at a time of great joy, understand that your scary swan song is reminiscent of one who greets the news that a 95 year old has survived a quadruple heart attack (may Hashem protect all) with a loud “he's not worth celebrating. I remember him when he was six months old and he once spat up on his grandmother.” The only difference here is that the only vomit in this case are the lies and negativity themselves.

Before jumping head first into the mud (we will, for those who can't wait), let's first and foremost deal with who Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin is. Anyone who knows him will tell you that he never legitimately turned away anyone who needed anything. Of his income, he did not give 10%. He did not give 20%. He gave far more and everyone who came to him was well received. May Hashem bless him to give and nurture the world.

Even his business was centered around helping people. He and his father single-handedly lowered the price of kosher (Biblically mandated) meat throughout North America. His whole live revolved and revolves around helping people. He is also a deeply spiritual man. On top of this, he has given countless donations and sponsorships to youth teams, assistance centers, etc. regardless of religion, race or creed. This is all fact and has been attested to by said organizations.

“Oh, but he committed a crime.” No, not to any sane person who actually looks at the facts, HE DIDN'T.

He did not do anything untoward with regard to banking – which we'll get to. He did not bring in illegals, as two levels of prosecution both lost in this regard, one having to withdraw and the other resulting in acquittal at trial. His HR staff didn't double/triple vet them, but the same can be said for any slaughter house (the only difference is that Rubashkin treated these stable hands far better than any of his competitors, even giving them money to pay their medical bills and other serious needs). And he was not even cruel to charging bulls, which was the opening salvo in the public relations war against him.

He did sell Biblically sanctioned meat at a low price. But that was only a crime in the now defunct USSR – and to the great beacons of a light at PETA. A close look at the facts shows that that's about all he did, aside from his charitable work.

No one disputes that his slaughter house was targeted only after AND AS A RESULT of PETA's persistent harassment campaign. For those who don't know who PETA is, while their no longer associated founder seems like a decent person, they are now the group that holds memorials for the 6 Million Chickens “murdered” before Yom Kippur, complete with Holocaust-mocking/”wanting another one” (ch”v) undertones. Some of their other acts of glorious wonder include encouraging parents to give their kids beer instead of milk (because beer isn't “stolen from cows without permission”) and, more recently, kidnapping dogs from people's porches and euthanizing them well before the mandatory wait time for owners to reclaim them.

In short, they'd be up for the Humanitarian of the Year if they didn't so disdain humankind. So let's make them happy and give them the Braying Mule of the Year Award instead.

These PETAites, complete with quite contagious PETAitis, placed hidden cameras in Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin's barns. And lo and behold, wild animals acted like wild animals. One cow, out of thousands, even jumped up and caught its neck on a hook, or something like that.

So they raised a cry of outrage to everyone who didn't stop and think for a second. Never mind that weekly government visits showed that all storing conditions were met, that the animals needed to be kept in good shape in order to produce marketable meat and that independent ritual slaughterers who could have worked anywhere were there on a daily basis and are generally loathe to work under dire circumstances. No, no, one cow jumped up and had an accident and everyone from the CEO on down is now Heinrich Himmler with peiyos.

Now, Rubashkin did slaughter a lot of cows – and he ate them too! So if we go with PETA's motto that “Chickens Are People As Well,” then Sholom Rubashkin is a mass murderer and a cannibal, as are 95% of Americans.

Even then, one has to wonder: a) why not go after the makers of Barbecue Sauce, the real enablers in this situation, instead and b) doesn't all this take away from effecting real positive change, like finally giving disenfranchised wild wombats the right to vote?

Now the genocidal murder of raging bulls is not an official crime. Nor is the general safe herding of animals. In fact, the biggest proof that the living conditions of Rubashkin's animals were above board is that if any laws were actually broken, even local ordinances, the kind folks at PETA would have been on it like a piranha let loose in PetSmart. They weren't because there was nothing there.

So what was PETA to do when their hours, upon, hours, upon hours – enough to fill a whole mental ward and its bedpans – of footage ended up producing diddly squat on toast? Well, let's look for other crimes. And as it happens, those valiant saviors of “chickenkind” didn't care much for migrant working Mexican people.

Now Rubashkin's meat packing plant did have workers who were not allowed to work in the country. He did not hire them. His HR actually did vet them and they provided bogus socials, and in many cases bogus ID. He did not bring them into the country. He did not seek them out. He also factually had no way of knowing that they were illegal.

So his HR team didn't vet all employees with extra care and scrutiny. I'm not going to say that's right. I am going to say that:

a) this is the case with almost every single meat packing plant in the nation, none of which were raided by ICE with the owners arrested b) these were people who were already here and would have likely turned to robbery had no menial jobs been available c) it may not be right, but you don't shut down a plant that legitimately employs hundreds while doing nothing to any of its competitors d) this does not warrant cooking up a charge with which to give the owner a 27 year sentence, may no one know of such things e) no one disputes that the plant was shut down after being targeted by PETA and made fodder of in the press, mostly over the cow that jumped up onto (or fell back on, or danced musical chairs around - whatever) a hook in the barn

Moreover, neither he nor his then 80 plus year old father, who was dragged into court and tried over this as well, were directly involved (or even indirectly involved) in hiring. This also seems to be the one and only issue that no one involved quite cared about, other than to use as an excuse to shut down the plant, close Rubashkin's business and drive up the price of kosher meat.

His plant raided and him charged with flimsy immigration violations in spite of the above, the now temporarily defunct plant could no longer repay its loans. And looking at the fine print that no one looks at on a revolving line of credit is how they finally stuck it to him.

This becomes more complicated. This is also why Sholom Rubashkin went to trial on the merits, yet the accusation of “white collar” crime has poisoned many a jury, and has caused them to convict based on the principle of “there must be something here.” To understand what happened here one has to understand the nature of such a charge and such a dog fight.

If someone takes out a home mortgage and is specifically prohibited from transferring the property to a company, this can be “bank fraud.”

If someone writes a check or uses their debt card in such a way that causes an account to be overdrawn, the case can be made that one has engaged in “bank fraud.”

In none of these scenarios is the person seen to be the living, breathing, reincarnation of Al Capone. In none of these scenarios should the person be prosecuted or did the person have intent to commit a crime. And if such a person has received a 27 year sentence, then they are the victim of abject cruelty beyond belief on the part of the judge.

The True Judge has reasons and “All of His Ways are Righteous” and much has been written of the suffering of the righteous. It is for this reason that Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin has so merited to awaken the collective Jewish heart and to awaken goodness and kindness among the leaders of the nation. It does not for one second excuse the cruel, callous and contemptuous acts of Linda Reade, the true criminal in this case.

Rubashkin's CFO had opened a revolving line of credit. It was used whenever an order was placed. It was maintained in good stead for years. But officially it was to be used only after an order had been delivered, not once it had been placed. And therein lies the “bank fraud.” A ridiculous technicality that the bank did not care about and that the credit holder would not pay attention to.

Not that it matters, due to the sheer ridiculousness of the case, but Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin himself had nothing to do with the bank loan, its draws, the receivables or anything of that nature. He was charged and sentenced because his financial manager arranged and utilized the loan, in a way that the bank had no problem with and in a way that few would think twice about. If not for the plant closing, the revolving line of credit would naturally have been maintained in an up to date manner unto this day, just as it was for years.

Rubashkin was sentenced to much extra time due to the Packers and Stockyards Act. This Depression Era law stipulates that one may not purchase livestock on credit. In other words, one may not buy and receive a cow on Wednesday and pay for it on Thursday. Rubashkin's company often did this. While this ordinance has been used (usually maliciously) to shut down and fine companies, no one other than Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin has been prosecuted and sentenced for it. Certainly it doesn't sound like something worthy of prosecution.

In short, all creditors were paid except for the revolving line of credit, which was also paid off reliably for years – until the company was singled out and shut down by immigration enforcement on charges that were only brought against it and not against 30 companies that did worse.

Linda Reade's husband profited mightily from the forced sale of Rubashkin's company, Agriproccessors. She was also found to be the judge who signed off on the immigration raid against the plant, something she never disclosed when presiding over the trial over the “financial crimes” (using the line of credit after an order was placed instead of when the goods were received one or two days later – there were no other “financial crimes”). This is the same judge who held up appeal after appeal totaling a span of years, all out of pure spite. And is she usually a tough sentencer? No, she recently sentenced a terrorist collaborator to 5 years, less than a fifth of Rubashkin. The words “may the name of the wicked rot” apply to her, and may she meet the True Judge speedily in our days, who alone decrees – and may He do so.

When the USSR of old rounded up shochtim, ritual Biblical slaughters, took them into a forest and shot them in the middle of the night (I'm not exaggerating and have met many of their descendants, may they live long), people decried their actions. The KGB were fools. They should have given them a bank loan and found a contractual violation on Page 57B, Subsection F, Paragraph 2. That would have taught them.

The Sholom Mordechai Rubashkin case is nothing more and nothing less than a case in which a religious person selling religiously mandated meat was targeted, hounded and made fodder of by PETA and their friends in the media. Yes, the same PETA that ridicules the Holocaust every year, seeing it as a joke with which to deride the descendants of its survivors on the eve of Yom Kippur, the holiest day of the year.

Let's not help them. Let's actually do what any decent person would do. There's a reason why 6 former US Attorneys General, spanning the entire ideological spectrum of the nation, saw fit to stand up for Sholom Rubashkin.

In 1952-53, the Soviet Union accused Jewish doctors of trying to kill Stalin. This “Doctor's Plot” was about to be used as a pretext to send Jews throughout Russia to Bessearabia, on what would have been a trail of suffering. The plot was only abandoned after Stalin died on the Jewish holiday of Purim 1953. Mapam, a communist party in Israel, wholeheartedly announced its support for the Kremlim during that terrible time. “If the Soviet Union says so, it must be true.” The only difference between PETA and the Soviets is that one was a country and the other are wannabee lunatics. In over 60 years, we should have learned better than to take either at face value.

"It looks like he was guilty, innocent motives notwithstanding."

I'm not qualified to comment, but...

Would a person of innocent motives not withstand in ancient Rome, the Macedonian Empire, the Persian Empire, the Babylonian Empire, Sodom or the culture immediately before the Flood? You're correct. Many times, not. Many people with innocent motives, when accused, will not withstand in such civilizations. Prophets spoke of people being in prisons.

Prophets then spoke of people being free. In my unqualified opinion, Sholom Rubashkin committed an error against survival in a civilization said by its own lawyers, judges and their instructors to be modeled on their preferred government of ancient Rome.

All good young men should be impeccable in obedience and appearance, even though such impeccability is the pursuit of great men of war. I'm not speaking with any intent toward warfare today here but am referring to strategy for civil survival in a nation like Rome.

As a tenuously related aside, though, being impeccable for war and living "by the sword" are two different ways. One is the way of good preparedness for what one might have to do. The other is the robber's way, either informal or officious (to "live by the sword").

"What was the injustice was the sentence, which was clearly out of line, so much so I can’t see any reason for it except antisemitism."

Yes, and large numbers of others who attacked do claim to be like Sholom Rubashkin. That's the most hideous part, hurtful even to an outsider as unqualified as myself. There were also other casualties: great men with the greatest sight and most successful teaching efforts going out to this dimmest world.

There is an editoral slant to this that does it no service. 400 illegals are 400 illegals, no matter how you cut it, regardless of how rife the idustry is with the practice. 27 years for non-violent crimes seems a bit much when rapists get far less, but many crimes over a period of time appear to have been committed.

I still side with Trump on this.

Jew Hater EEGator feels free to post his Jew Hate on Free Republic

and then whines when when he is called on it.

Jew Hater EEGator posted:

To: Yomin Postelnik

A Jew lying for another Jew, what a surprise...

14 posted on 12/22/2017, 7:55:14 AM by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

What another surprise, when called out for bad behavior, the anti Semitic card is pulled.

Not surprising when hoe fits. There are Jewhaters on the right, even in the GOP and FR. You bring FR and our Republican President into disrepute. Was your opinion of any significance to most outside the hate and jihadist communities, Democrats could point to EEGator as representative of right wing, Republican antisemitism. Reporters would ask the President to disown you. Fortunately you're of no import at all.

Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Wasn't going to ping any more of these, but it doesn't seem to end and does bring the haters out.

The authors argument is a straw man, the examples he uses are crimes. Often not prosecuted since they're not often known about, but crimes none the less, and are prosecuted. I don't know about the federal immigration charge, but given the usually unmentioned fact that he was acquitted on state immigration charges, I suspect the only reason for dropping the charges wasn't the conviction on financial crimes. The good news, the government can still prosecute. The conduct of the judge seems to be particularly questionable. Not often a judge's husband profits from the demise of a company based on a case in wifies court. That's a privilege usually reserved for Congress. But I suppose nothing illegal about it. The sentence seems out of the normal range. The President of the United States thinks so, as do hundreds of legal professionals including 5 former Attorney General's. The President has put that behind us, the time served doesn't seem unreasonable. It's a shame that those with issues with Rubashkin, because of his faith, cast dispersions on our President. If it's true that the Jews bought him off, or that's he's a puppet dancing to Bibi's tune, or Sheldon Adelson's, then the Nazis had a point and the dems are right, President Trump should be impeached.

There is an editoral slant to this that does it no service. 400 illegals are 400 illegals

The crime he was convicted of had nothing to do with illegals. That aside, imo without going into details, it goes beyond editorial slant. His financial crimes were crimes. The author is incorrect that they're never charged, though not often. They're the types of crimes that don't usually come to light. They do come to light when the lender takes losses, and decides to involve the authorities. The sentence does seem excessive. And that seems to me to be the issue worthy of discussion. Not immigration charges dropped of which he was acquitted. Not even PETA.

"Not surprising when hoe fits."

Yeah, EEGator. Taking advantage of SJackson's innocent typographical error, I'll say, "If the hoe fits, wear it there among the trailers of Methtown, ma white Ninja."

[Little effort to establish communication on the Juggalo level there. I try to be charitable towards them. Not very good at it, yet. Another one recently called me a "snob."]

I don’t know if this guy is guilty or not, but our court system and prosecutors are very corrupt, and I would not believe anything they say or any documents they provide.

Federal prosecutors are liars who often railroad innocent people into prison for political purposes.

In MarvinStinson's comment #15, you'll find more information and good points made in the article by by Conrad Black (see "bankruptcy" for one). Conrad's pro-family, anti-divorce, pro-American advocacy attracted many influential people on the radical, anti-American and misogamist (anti-marriage) left in three countries to pursue him, until they found a way to give him a treatment similar to what was done to Rubashkin.

Before that, Conrad owned the National Post in Canada and sold it to the liberal Asher family, if I remember correctly (been a long time). The Ashers were honest and honorable enough to promise Conrad that they would continue the publication in such a way as to suit the readership developed by Conrad. It appeared that they had some respect and admiration for him despite possible minor differences of political opinion. As far as I know, they honored their promise.

Thank you! This was my first article for Canada Free Press, almost 10 years ago:

http://canadafreepress.com/article/black-and-radler-victims-of-fitzgeraldian-injustice-and-they-should-be-pard

Black and Radler, Victims of Fitzgeraldian Injustice – And They Should be Pardoned

Yes, I’m sure you’d be circling the wagons if the same criminal was Sean McLaughlin or Tony DiNunzio...

Since you hate Jews so much, I hope you are consistent enough to not claim to love G-d or the Bible.

You think those people in the Book of Joshua were your ancestors?

zeestephen wrote: “And, he never paid the money back.”

Marvin Stimson replied: He couldn’t after everything he owned was confiscated. Did you MISS that simple fact? Or are you deliberately presenting incomplete ‘information’ out of maliciousness?

zeestephen replies:

Nothing was confiscated from Rubashkin.

He was broke.

He was living off illegally obtained loans.

Half of his employees were illegal immigrants.

Rubashkin did not own a business. He owned a criminal enterprise.

Marvin Stimson writes:

6 former US Attorneys General, spanning the entire ideological spectrum of the nation, saw fit to stand up for Sholom Rubashkin. Explain that, Mr. Rabid.

zeestephen replies:

You need to do your own research, Marvin.

You are simply quoting the unsigned pro-Rubashkin essay that was posted at the beginning of this thread.

Every well known person who publicly supported the release of Rubashkin is a registered Democrat, or a Republican who supports Amnesty, or a Libertarian who supports Open Border immigration.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.