Posted on 09/20/2017 3:14:06 PM PDT by ebb tide
Pope Francis and Martin, both Jesuits, touting their "god of surprises".
The two greatest enemies of Christianity this century are Jesuits and Muslims.
>>In other words, Martin is pushing the protestant notion that teaching only becomes magisterial if the people “receive” the teaching.
The author takes this heresy by some boy-buggering priest and blames it on Protestants?!? And he makes up some doctrine that actual Reformed Protestants do not believe!
if laws don’t apply to me if i merely say i’m not interested in obeying them
then I am not interested in obeying the law against
bank robbery, either
I know there are linguistic peculiarities...that plural Elohim for instance...but is the original word for “spirit” feminine? I bet not.
And then there’s another fine point. To wit, claiming that chastity is not binding on homosexuals is...insane.
Entirely too many Jesuit hoofprints in the Lord’s house, imho.
The people have not “received” taxation but hey, guess what, we still have to pay taxes! The idea that you can break a law with impunity - especially God’s law - because you choose not to accept the teaching is truly Orwellian. This viper justifies people picking apart the Bible to fit their own personal ethics or lack thereof. So much for Truth. There is a special place down below for this type of demon.
I have asked that the “catholic caucus” designation on this thread to be removed.
My apologies.
Everyone is bound to chastity - even married people are bound to chastity.
2349 “People should cultivate [chastity] in the way that is suited to their state of life. Some profess virginity or consecrated celibacy which enables them to give themselves to God alone with an undivided heart in a remarkable manner. Others live in the way prescribed for all by the moral law, whether they are married or single.” Married people are called to live conjugal chastity; others practice chastity in continence:
You don’t need AI algorithms to peg the gaydar with this guy.
What????? Such dreadful craziness.
Cloven hooves, to be sure.
I know, right?!
And why not? When “authority” rests with “tradition”, supersedes the Gospels, and tradition is malleable and can change. I would say /sarc; but that would be lying.
I’ve read the New Testament book of James. Is there a James 2 from this guy that is also divinely inspired? If not, I will stick with actual scripture - God’s word.
Why? So you can revel in the usual Catholic haters on this web site!
If you do something long enough, it becomes tradition.
And the rest of what you said follows. It may be detestable, but you have to admit, it’s convenient.
“I’ve decided I do it... and I’m a good person... and God wouldn’t hate me so it just be ok!”
No. It was because the article mentioned other faiths.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.