Posted on 10/20/2015 2:58:06 PM PDT by NYer
Recently, Whoopi Goldberg made the bold announcement that the Bible has nothing to say about the subject of abortion. An audacious statement, especially since Ms. Goldberg has no scholarly credentials in the field of theology. But it should be noted that Ms. Goldberg is not alone in this belief; other abortion advocates have made such pronouncements as well as made the claim that since the Bible is silent on the issue it must, therefore, be licit.
While it is true that the Bible certainly does not explicitly use the term “abortion” that does not mean that it has nothing to say on the subject. In fact, St. Paul did implicitly write about abortion, specifically in his Epistle to the Galatians. In chapter 5 verse 20 where he mentions the term “pharmakeia”. This Greek word is usually translated as sorcery or magic, but it has a much deeper meaning than just those. A more precise understanding of the term could be rendered with another modern translation of the term, “pharmacy” or “drugs”. “Pharmakeia”, in Paul’s mind, would have been drugs (or potions) made by a sorcerer. This word had an even darker tone for St. Paul since it would be these “sorcerers” who made potions that caused abortion.
But certainly, as some would say, Paul could have merely meant to tell the Christian to avoid magic. This, however, seems to be a narrow and shallow interpretation of the Scripture passage. First, for the reason that the term “pharmakeia” follows after Paul lists certain sexual sins, as one can see in two different translations of the text. The New American Bible translation simply states, “Now the works of the flesh are obvious: immorality, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery…”(NAB, Galatians 5:19-20). However, the New Jerusalem Bible offers a slightly different translation, “When self-indulgence is at work the results are obvious: sexual vice, impurity, and sensuality, the worship of false gods and sorcery…”(NJB, Galatians 5:19-20). This translation gives the reader a better historical insight into what Paul was trying to say. One should always keep in mind that Paul lived in the Roman Empire and his writing, while inspired by the Holy Spirit, was directed towards the Galatian Gentile Christians of the age. These Gentile Christians were formerly pagan, not converts from Judaism, and would have practiced pagan activities prior to their conversions. Paul, being familiar with pagan rituals and activities since he grew up in primarily pagan Tarsus, would have understood this reality. Again, one must keep in mind that Paul is warning the Galatians against falling back into pagan (those who worshipped false gods) sexual practices which included promiscuous sex and “sorcerers” who made abortifacient concoctions in order to end those pregnancies. So it makes perfect sense that Paul would have listed the results of “self-indulgence” as the New Jerusalem text translates, the way he did. It just flows logically since pagan sexual practices did lead to the very real possibility of abortion.
Secondly, Paul was a Pharisee prior to his conversion. But what does this mean? Paul would have been highly educated in the Jewish law and Jewish law prohibited abortion. In addition, Paul certainly understood the words of Christ, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the law or the prophets. I have come not to abolish but to fulfill” (NAB, Matthew 5:17). Children were seen as a blessing from God under Jewish law. This respect for the unborn as a blessing from the Lord is even mentioned by the ancient Jewish historian Flavius Josephus when he says, “The law, moreover, enjoins us to bring up our offspring, and forbids women to cause abortion of what is begotten, or destroy it afterward…” (See Against Apion). Paul, in his tome to the Galatians, wishes to convey not only the truth about the beauty of the creation of the unborn child, but that the unjust killing of the unborn child is contrary to the plan of God. He carries the Jewish tradition of the respect for the unborn into the Christian tradition.
Finally, it would seem that this interpretation of Paul is congruent with the thought of the earliest Fathers of the Church. One of the earliest teachings on abortion comes from the early catechism known as the Didache and it mirrors almost exactly what Paul had said to the Galatians, “And the second commandment of the Teaching; You shall not commit murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not commit pederasty, you shall not commit fornication, you shall not steal, you shall not practice magic, you shall not practice witchcraft, you shall not murder a child by abortion nor kill that which is begotten” (See Didache, Ch. 2). Again, notice how abortion comes directly after magic and witchcraft. The anonymous author of the Didache is not writing outside of Apostolic teaching. It becomes quite clear that the author is basically composing, into a teaching volume, the moral theology of the Apostle Paul. St. Barnabas again mirrors this thought in his own epistle when, like the Didache, he states it in such a way that it mimics the way in which it was presented in the Didache. In this epistle he states, “You shall not slay the child by procuring abortion; nor, again, shall you destroy it after it is born” (See Epistle of Barnabas, ch. 19). While the Didache closely resembles the passage from the Letter to the Galatians, this particular epistle mentions abortion first then gets into the list that Paul mentions in the next chapter. While chapter 20 of the Epistle of Barnabas does not mention abortion in the English translation, it does mention poisoning next to the word “magic”. This is interesting since the word “murder” was just mentioned a few words ahead. It is more than reasonable, that the author of this letter is making the connection between abortion and magic like Paul.
It is clear that the earliest Church Fathers understood exactly what St. Paul meant by this term “pharmakeia” and the concept of abortion is intended to be a part of that declaration of what is illicit. Making the claim that the Bible says nothing of abortion because the word is not explicitly mentioned is not only incorrect, but shows a gross ignorance of the Holy Word. Modern polemicists need to tread careful water when speaking about Scripture. Just because Ms. Goldberg played a nun in two movies, that does not make her a Biblical scholar.
The second part of the teaching
1 But the second commandment of the teaching is this: 2 "Thou shalt do no murder; thou shalt not commit adultery"; thou shalt not commit sodomy; thou shalt not commit fornication; thou shalt not steal; thou shalt not use magic; thou shalt not use philtres; thou shalt not procure abortion, nor commit infanticide; "thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's goods"; 3 thou shalt not commit perjury, "thou shalt not bear false witness"; thou shalt not speak evil; thou shalt not bear malice. 4 Thou shalt not be double-minded nor double-tongued, for to be double-tongued is the snare of death. 5 Thy speech shall not be false nor vain, but completed in action. 6 Thou shalt not be covetous nor extortionate, nor a hypocrite, nor malignant, nor proud; thou shalt make no evil plan against thy neighbour. 7 Thou shalt hate no man; but some thou shalt reprove, and for some shalt thou pray, and some thou shalt love more than thine own life.
Catholic ping!
Wouldn’t “Thou Shall NOT Kill” simply do?
Queen Anne’s Lace.
And also Exodus 21 has clear application:
Verses 22-25
22 If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
23 And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life,
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
If one's man actions causes an 'unexpected birth' ('the woman's fruit departs') - the instigator will be punished by the effect on the child. For the case of the Abortionist - this would be death.
Abortion would be anathema to Jesus, killing the most innocent and helpless of God’s creations. I could see Him with his whip, in righteous anger, driving the abortion doctors/nurses and baby-killing mothers OUT of the clinics. FOR SHAME on them.
She’s a despicable clod.
Goldberg is either out of her mind or just being one of Satan’s minions.
How about both?
Of course. I wonder what part of “Thou Shalt Not Kill” they
pretend not to understand.
Being out of her mind would partially absolve her, to my way of thinking. How can she or anyone NOT see murder in abortion? I guess the fifth commandment isn't in THEIR ten commandments.
IMO, anyone choosing to serve satan is out of their mind. I think we are seeing a preview of the Revelation with obozo getting elected twice, people calling evil good and the great deception hat has befallen those who choose to defy God.
Yo Whoopi, did your mother have an abortion?
Of course Whoopie has “scholarly credentials in the field of theology.” She has most likely seen the following movies: The Bible, The Greatest Story Ever Told, and the Ten Commandments. What more of a scholarly biblical education could you expect her to have?
Whoopi herself has had something like six.
There’s something terribly wrong with her.
That’s sick.
Yes, she used to boast publicly about having 6-8 abortions. She could not afford the children, but she could afford to have unmarried sex all her partners.
Poisonous hemlock is easily mistaken for Queen Anne’s Lace.
“Poison-hemlock can be confused with wild carrot (Daucus carota, or Queen Anne’s Lace), as with many other members of the parsley family that resemble it. ...Snip.... Poison-hemlock is acutely toxic to people and animals, with symptoms appearing 20 minutes to three hours after ingestion. All parts of the plant are poisonous and even the dead canes remain toxic for up to three years...”
I do not think that you would be looking for Queen Anne’s Lace but if you know anyone who might be, please let them know!
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.