Posted on 04/27/2015 11:49:59 AM PDT by NYer
Never believe rumors of Jesus death. He is alive and well and coming soon to a theater near you.
Sean Bean is one a-list actor listed for a movie about Jesus boyhood that will hit theaters in 2016.
Hugh Jackman will star as St. Paul in another reported movie due out next year.
Pope Francis recently blessed the actor playing Jesus in a new version of Ben Hur.
Thus, in 2016, Hollywood will feature at least three movies that more or less affirm the basic Christian understanding of Jesus Christ.
Ironically, these three movies will come 10 years after The Da Vinci Code hit theaters, a Tom Hanks vehicle based on Dan Browns take-down of the basic Christian understanding of Jesus.
I remember the worry so many Christians had in the wake of The Da Vinci Code. Many expected widespread misunderstandings of Jesus to take root. That didnt happen. Five years after the book and movie phenomenon, when I started to teach my Christianity and Mass Media class at Benedictine College, I found that my students had barely heard of it, had never heard its premise, and had not in the least been influenced by either the book or the movie.
Now, media versions of the real Jesus have totally eclipsed the phony Jesus of Dan Brown.
Consider the Christ-centered projects that have been attracting millions of viewers this year:
National Geographic produced a documentary called Killing Jesus based on the book by Bill OReilly. The documentary attracted a record 3.7 million viewers for the National Geographic Channel and handily beat the two previous OReilly projects the network did: Killing Kennedy and Killing Lincoln.
CNN this March presented Finding Jesus: Faith, Fact, Forgery, a six-part examination of relics tied to Jesus. Kate OHare reports that the show at least makes a pass at being fair, and includes interviews with Tim Gray of the Augustine Institute in Denver, Jesuit Father James Martin, S.J., and Notre Dame Universitys Candida Moss.
The least hyped Jesus presentation this year was the art film Last Days in the Desert which stars Ewan McGregor as both Jesus and Satan. It debuted at Sundance in January, received mostly positive reviews that deemed its take on Jesus fairly traditional and non-contentious, and hasnt been heard from since.
The most hyped Jesus show was probably the NBC hit miniseries A.D.: The Bible Continues that started at Easter. Jesus in the series is played by Juan Pablo Di Pace who says his parents named him after Pope John Paul II. In an interview with NBC News he guessed at why Biblical movies have been so popular. After 2012 there's been a shift in humanity, society and economics, he said. We're witnessing a transition, everything is changing really fast with that comes a wanting to see and believe, and faith and spirituality come into play.
We will see next year what that new interest brings.
Christ the Lord, based on Anne Rices book about Jesus' childhood, will be released by Focus Features the week before Easter 2016. The Internet Movie Database lists Sean Bean as Severus but few details are available yet.
Ben Hur is an MGM/Parmount production, and is expected in February 2016. The studio says it is not a remake of the Charlton Heston iconic role, but that the film returns to the heart of Lew Wallaces epic novel focusing on the nature of faith. Wallaces 1880 novel was titled Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ. The cast includes Morgan Freeman, Jack Huston and Ayelet Zurer.
Fewer details are available about Apostle Paul, a project reportedly produced by Ben Affleck and Matt Damon and starring Hugh Jackman as the last apostle to meet Jesus after the Resurrection, on the road to Damascus.
Add to all these the 2014s Son of God and you get eight high-profile Jesus productions in three years.
Of course it isnt just Jesus attracting interest, but Scripture, too. Darren Aronofskys overrated 2014 hit Noah and Ridley Scotts underrated Moses: Gods and Kings from 2014 both made tidy profits. And more Biblical projects are rumored, focusing on Cain and Abel and Pontius Pilate.
The phenomenon makes one thing crystal clear: The much vaunted rise of atheism and decline of religion is not a done deal. Jesus Christ remains the figure who cleaved time in two, whether you say Anno Domino or Common Era.
Even after he is denigrated, dismissed and pushed to the margins by medias gatekeepers, the crowds demand to see him.
Jesus still stands in the center of culture, demanding to be noticed exactly as you would expect of the Word of God made flesh.
Ping!
Hollyweird should be banned from making these
I’ve been watching the series “A.D.” And have been enjoying it very much. It seems to really capture the story of the gospels and Acts, and fairly honestly from what I’ve seen so far.
Anybody else have some comment or critique?
Some of these movies are worth seeing and are not even (that) blasphemous. I know.
Two thumbs up!
why? AD was done well. Heard The Moses movie wasn’t awful.
If made in good taste, why not?
I know they are after our money, im not a fool. But if well made and faithful to Christianity, I’m for it.
Noah was an abomination, the Opposite of what the bible taught. It was an environmentalist movie an Crowe made fun of Christians.
Ben Hur without Chariot Race? don’t know if it will be in there or not.
Apostle Paul, a project reportedly produced by Ben Affleck and Matt Damon and starring Hugh Jackman as the last apostle to meet... //
that’s the one that bugs me out.
I caught part of it and thought it was well done. I saw Roma and her husband on with David Jeremiah yesterday as well.
If any of these flicks have the Biblical authenticity of Noah, AD or Killing Jesus, I’ll stay home.
I’ve been surprised. A.D. seems to be nicely done.
Watched two episodes and stopped. Aside from the representation of the angel at the tomb I find the whole thing kind of anti-climatic. I find the dialog cheesy and their idea of somethings, like rebels throwing Molotov type cocktails, is a bit over the top.
What was inauthentic about AD?
Those weapons, like the pottery fire bombs, had existed for hundreds of years by that time. It's not unreasonable at all. Given how easy they are to make they made a great weapon for an unsophisticated militia. Molotov didn't invent the idea.
On a slightly different topic, I watched a bit of Wolf Hall - covering Thomas More and found it disturbing - made a hero out of Thomas Cromwell and a villain out of More. I’m sure that A Man for All Seasons exaggerated the other direction but still - the court room scene where More was shouted down brought to mind our current campus environment.
“Christ the Lord, based on Anne Rices book about Jesus’ childhood, will be released by Focus Features the week before Easter 2016.”
From the School Library Review (at Amazon):
“At age seven, the boy [Jesus} and his family leave Egypt to return to their home. . . He feels like a typical seven-year-old, but he’s also suddenly discovering abilities that no one else possesses. He brings clay birds to life, makes snow fall, and even resurrects a dead playmate. Stunned by these odd happenings, he turns to Joseph and Mary for answers. When they are not forthcoming, he’s forced to hunt out clues through local legends, rumors, and a strange spirit that taunts him in his dreams.”
Yeah, right...
Yeah I know that. Be it that the Jewish Revolution did not occur until 66 A.D. I do not reconcile the Jews fighting against the Roman occupiers at that level prior to that, they were a conquered sheep.
That just sounds crazy
“I do not reconcile the Jews fighting against the Roman occupiers at that level prior to that, they were a conquered sheep.”
Well, actually, there were lots of revolts. (See Josephus’ histories.) After one, a Roman general named Varus (later famous for his defeat in Germany) slaughtered a lot of people at a town named Emmaus.
And there were several revolts in Galilee, some led by one particular family. Presumably a member of that family
later headed the fighters at Masada— Eliezor ben Yair.
Or, as we would put it, Eleazor the son of Jairus.
Whether that fellow is related to the Jairus of the NT or not is unknowable; but an interesting possibility.
If the cast and crew of the movie are consistently Christian, then it might be worth supporting. Otherwise, be very cautious about giving money to your enemies, just because they talk the talk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.