Posted on 03/26/2014 6:48:19 PM PDT by marshmallow
Sandra Fluke sounds the alarm over "potentially catastrophic" Hobby Lobby case
Social justice attorney Sandra Fluke, now running for California State Senate, sounded the alarm Tuesday about the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court case, which pits the religious objections of the owners of corporations against Obamacare’s “contraception mandate.” In an opinion piece in The Washington Post, Fluke called the case a “potential catastrophe for women’s rights,” arguing that “corporations cannot have religious views” and a rule in the favor of religious objections would set America on a dangerous course.
USA Today reports that the first day of the hearings did not bode well for those who champion the Obamacare contraception mandate, as the Obama administration struggled to present its case to the justices, a majority of whom appeared inclined to protect the religious freedoms of organizations.
(Excerpt) Read more at truthrevolt.org ...
She took time off from panhandling for rubbers, eh?
Isn’t someone porking her to keep her satisfied?
But, of course, corporations can have political views, huh Sandra? Like Google?
So if we take religion out of the equation how about this?
My wife and I are both 50. She has been through menopause (and yes it was hell) and I had a vasectomy. WHY ARE WE REQUIRED TO HAVE BIRTH CONTROL IN OUR POLICY IF WE DON’T NEED IT?
It says Congress shall pass no law.
Now that Congress has passed a law, we have a problem.
She’s a fruitcake. Still worrying about where her next box of condoms is going to come from and who is going to buy them for her.
fluke’s not particulary bright....even by rather astonishing standards of todays yout.
DO corporations not have ownership...and MANAGEMENT?
What differences are there between views on say SALES..and views on Spiritual Matters... other than that they arent in the same “realm”?
May fluker get involved with organizng a community somewhere and leave us ALONE
Fluke off.
has she graduated yet?
Corporations can have religious views. In fact, I’m betting the stockholders meeting produces views on lots of things that the corporation goes with.
“corporations cannot have religious views”
Oh they can’t? Well then, you’ve walked right into the logic trap. If they cannot hold religious views, then by extension, they do not have to act morally. Therefore, to the end of this reasoning, businesses may not be held accountable for detrimental actions. You’ve said this yourself, Mizzzzzz Fluke.
So Sandra (the slut) Fluke speaks...
Remember, Social Justice is just a euphemism for Socialism.
My gosh, what a parasite! Kinda like community organizer.
She type this at the brothel?
she’s about as
ditzy as Pelosi Boxer and Feinstein...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_corporation
Time to release a little liber induced hyperbole. Sandra is a slut, and Ann Arbor is still a whore. (The last part is a Penn State thing, but it feels good.)
Ms.Contraceptive has spoken, we can all laugh now.
Sandra, if you get elected to the California Senate, you’ll get all the condoms you want! Don’t worry so much!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.