[plain talk]

Well I think the first one is much worse. I do agree the Bible is not a science book. Would be interesting however to see what a replica would actually look like.

[goodwithagun]

I think it would be awesome to visit. My kids would get a kick out of it.

[MHGinTN]

Not a science book, BUT have you read the Physics lesson Jesus gave to Philip in John chapter fourteen, or the temporal rift scenes found in the OT, especially associated to Elisha and Elijah? There's even time travel or missing time stories, like the little boy who was sent by Elijah to pick figs for a gathering. He returned from the fig orchard with a load of figs only to find 65 years had passed!

The Bible will not lie to us, but it does have some veeeery interesting lessons.

[DaveyB]

I do agree the Bible is not a science book.

Your statement begs the questions:

• What then is the Bible?
• And what is science such that a book can be labeled a science book?
• What must a science book be (contain/exclude) in order to be a science book?