[DaveyB]

I do agree the Bible is not a science book.

Your statement begs the questions:

• What then is the Bible?
• And what is science such that a book can be labeled a science book?
• What must a science book be (contain/exclude) in order to be a science book?

[plain talk]

It contains the writing of prophets and apostles and covers more history & theology than science. It describes what happened and not the details of how it was done. I am not sure how one would view it as a science book and if so how one would arrive at such a conclusion.