Posted on 12/10/2013 2:26:00 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o
Alison Davis was born with spina bifida. She later developed conditions including osteoporosis, arthritis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Coping with these permanently disabling and painful conditions dominated but did not define her life. Indeed, they led her to champion the rights of the vulnerable, the disabled and the unborn, first as an atheist and then as a Catholic.
Her early adult life was marked by a determination to live as normal a life as possible, despite having to use a wheelchair. She studied sociology at university, where she stopped believing in God. Writing about this period of her life in a paper she delivered to a New Zealand Family Life International Conference in 2009 she was honest: “It was largely because I wanted to live a lifestyle I knew was incompatible with the Christian faith.” She married young, in 1975, but after ten years in which she “tried very hard to find happiness without God”, the marriage failed.
At university Alison had strongly supported a woman’s right to choose abortion but her attitude changed after she read of the case of a baby girl, Louise, born in 1979 with the same disabilities as hers, who had been deliberately starved and dehydrated to death by Dr Donald Garrow of the High Wycombe Hospital. The case, which received wide publicity at the time, shocked her to the core.
In 1981 the Guardian published a letter in which she criticised the killing of newborn disabled babies. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) contacted her and argued that killing the newborn disabled was a consequence of killing the unborn. Alison was reluctant to give weight to SPUC’s arguments but within a couple of years she accepted them and became pro-life. From 1983 Alison worked full-time for SPUC’s newly developed Handicap Division (its name was later changed to No Less Human), for disabled people as well as their families and carers, and became a major commentator on anti-life policies which discriminated against disabled people.
John Smeaton, chief executive of SPUC, writes that “In spite of serious illness [Alison] continued to write, publish and broadcast on the eugenic nature of the Abortion Act and on healthcare and government policies, including major interviews on BBC’s Newsnight, the World Service’s Heart and Soul: Choosing Life series and leading letters in the national newspapers.”
In 1985 her marriage ended and in the following years a number of serious personal difficulties resulted in her making several suicide attempts. Yet paradoxically, she also started to search for religious belief. Having studied other world faiths, she turned to the Bible. “I began to think it could just be true,” she wrote. In 1986 she went to Scotland to stay with the prominent pro-life priest, Fr James Morrow of Humanae Vitae House in Braemar. He taught her to say the Rosary and she attended Mass in his chapel.
Yet the road to the Church was not easy and Alison still struggled to find meaning in life. Joining a pilgrimage to Lourdes she began to understand that she and the other sick people there were very much loved by God in their suffering. In 1987 she met Colin Harte who was working for SPUC. From 1989 he was her devoted companion and carer for the rest of her life; indeed, it was Alison’s conviction that pro-lifers should not compromise and exclude disabled babies in attempts to lower the abortion upper limit (as happened with David Alton’s 1987-88 Bill) that led Harte to question the whole basis of incremental legislation and to write his own book on the subject, Changing Unjust Laws Justly; Pro-Life Solidarity with the Last and the Least (2005).
During a second pilgrimage to Lourdes Alison learned for the first time that suffering need not be wasted; it can be offered up to God on behalf of others. She became increasingly drawn to Christ in the Blessed Sacrament. Finally, on Easter Sunday, 31 March 1991, she was received into the Church.
Although Alison knew she had “come home”, being a Catholic brought its own difficulties. She discovered some churches couldn’t accommodate wheelchair users and she sometimes experienced an acute sense of rejection. She learnt that her Faith would not remove the sorrows of life but that it does provide the grace and strength necessary to live with them. A visit to Calcutta over Christmas in 1991, and witnessing the love a pavement-dwelling family had for their tiny baby, brought home to her the infinite value of each human being created by God.
In 1995, with Colin’s help, she set up a charity for disabled children in South India. It gave her a sense of purpose in life that radically transformed the ensuing years. This changed perspective taught her the danger of euthanasia, which encourages people to make ultimate choices at a low point in their lives, on the assumption that it will never change for the better.
As someone who lived a life of considerable suffering, Alison often spoke of the opportunity to share in the sufferings of Christ, not merely as a privilege but as “the greatest privilege in the world.” Shortly before her death Colin Harte wrote, “Alison frequently heard it said after someone had died, ‘At least his (or her) suffering is now over.’ She asked me several times not to let anyone say that after she died, because she felt it diminished the particular gift she had to offer God. The Church provides a beautiful and profound teaching on suffering, but for many Catholics there is little understanding or appreciation of it. Alison’s life of intense suffering – physical, social, emotional, mental and spiritual – is an exceptional witness to the privilege and dignity of suffering in union with Christ.”
Alison Davis, who for 30 years was the representative of the SPUC [Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child, UK] disability group, No Less Human, was born on January 8, 1955. She died on December 3, 2013
May she rest in peace.
I had the privilege of hearing her speak at a couple of conferences. You wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of a debate with Alison Davis! Impressive intellect,
Note that by the end of her life, she had encountered and embraced the meaning of redemptive suffering. This is radical -- one of the most radical things of all.
Of personal interest.
This lady is a true heroine!
Not like that phony and his ilk in the White House.
Wow, she suffered! God be with her. Thank you for this post.
Rest In Peace. You are with the Lord now.
Might as well take the opportunity to seek some input.
Suppose you knew someone who could not receive further medical treatment for her terminal condition? Suppose you believed this person was considering ending her life?
And to put a very fine point on it - this person is not family or an intimate friend. She is a person I love and admire and she has been kind and supportive to me. She has expressed gratitude to me for things I have done in an area of mutual interest.
Furthermore, she has not told me directly of her possible plan; but I have certainty that she has this plan. (You’ll have to trust me on that.)
Finally, this person is a hundred miles away.
What’s my course of action?
“What’s my course of action?”
—
Prayer.
That’s it.
.
Thanks for posting such an inspirational story. Not many spina bifida babies are “allowed” to be born these days, especially under the auspices of the National Health Service. Allison lived almost 60 years and was a very positive force for good.
The advice: don’t kill yourself, but yield yourself to God to take care of the rest of your life on this mortal coil... and even more, to take care of your everlasting life.
Don-o, why did God arrange it that you would be her friend, and she would be your friend, --- you in particular, her in particular --- unless God expected you to be the word within the Word to her, the conveyer of a gentle, peaceful truth: trust God, eat what you like, take your pain meds, and sing, sweet lady, sing.
We'll sing around her --- tell her that, too.
REDEMPTION!!! NOTHING COMPARES!!!!
Anything that praises God will help. She is passing through a battle. The battle need not be in vain. It’s that dastardly little devil that wants her to hang it up and quit.
I don’t think suffering is something that God wants us to court for its own sake. It is simply going to happen on the way to redeeming other things. God will schedule it as appropriate. And we can bear up better if we keep a godly frame of mind as we go through it.
I am not sure that delivering a sermon is my next right move. I am constrained by distance, for one thing. If I were closer, I would take her a piece of this excellent eclair cake I made and we would sit and talk and maybe sing a bit. Perhaps the other thing would come up.
But, that won’t happen. I have to figure something out. Right now, I have reached out to one other person in hopes of doing something positive to steer the situation in a positive direction. What that might be, I have no clue. But, there must be something.
And that nothing..."tribulation, or DISTRESS, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword...NOTHING shall separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus.
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us. For I am persuaded, THAT NEITHER DEATH, NOR LIFE, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, NOR THINGS PRESENT, NOR THINGS TO COME, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature SHALL BE ABLE TO SEPARATE US FROM THE LOVE OF GOD, which IS IN CHRIST JESUS OUR LORD." (Rom. 8:35-39).
She needs to be assured that neither her life, nor her death, can separate her from the love of God, which is found in the finished work of Christ for her.
She is not ignorant what you have said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.