Posted on 04/02/2013 8:08:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A respected pro-family organization announced a boycott of Starbucks coffee. The group, which supports legal protection for traditional marriage, launched the "Dump Starbucks" campaign after a national board meeting in which the Seattle-based coffee company mentioned support for same-sex marriage as a core value of the company. Some Christians are wondering whether we ought to join in the boycott. I say no.
It's not that I'm saying a boycott in and of itself is always evil or wrong. It's just that, in this case (and in many like it) a boycott exposes us to all of our worst tendencies. Christians are tempted, again and again, to fight like the devil to please the Lord.
A boycott is a display of power, particularly of economic power. The boycott shows a corporation (or government or service provider) that the aggrieved party can hurt the company, by depriving it of revenue. The boycott, if it's successful, eventually causes the powers-that-be to yield, conceding that they need the money of the boycott participants more than they need whatever cause they were supporting. It is a contest of who has more buying power, and thus is of more value to the company. We lose that argument.
The argument behind a boycott assumes that the "rightness" of a marriage definition is constituted by a majority with power. Isn't that precisely what we're arguing against? Our beliefs about marriage aren't the way they are because we are in a majority. As a matter of fact, we must concede that we are in a tiny minority in contemporary American society, if we define marriage the way the Bible does, as a sexually-exclusive, permanent one-flesh union.
Moreover, is this kind of economic power context really how we're going to engage our neighbors with a discussion about the meaning and mystery of marriage? Do such measures actually persuade at the level such decisions are actually made: the moral imagination? I doubt it.
I'm all for protecting marriage in law and in culture, and I'm for that partly because I believe it is necessary for human flourishing for all people, believers and non-believers alike. But there's a way to do so that recognizes the resilience of marriage as a creation institution and that rests in the sovereignty of God over his universe.
Those who are scared of losing something are those who seem frantic or shrill or outraged. Those who are fearful resort to Gentile tactics of lording over others with political majorities or economic power. The winners, on the other hand, are able to take a longer view. We're able to grieve when our neighbors seek to copy marriage without the most basic thing that makes marriage work: the mystery of male and female as one-flesh.
But we don't persuade our neighbors by mimicking their angry power-protests. We persuade them by holding fast to the gospel, by explaining our increasingly odd view of marriage, and by serving the world and our neighbors around us, as our Lord does, with a towel and a foot-bucket.
We won't win this argument by bringing corporations to the ground in surrender. We'll engage this argument, first of all, by prompting our friends and neighbors to wonder why we don't divorce each other, and why we don't split up when a spouse loses his job or loses her health. We'll engage this argument when we have a more exalted, and more mysterious, view of sexuality than those who see human persons as animals or machines. And, most of all, we'll engage this argument when we proclaim the meaning behind marriage: the covenant union of Christ and his church.
Fear can lead us to cower and to hide a view of marriage that seems archaic and antiquated. That's why so many evangelical Christians have already surrendered, in their own lives, on such questions as round-the-clock daycare or a therapeutic view of divorce. But fear can also lead us to a kind of enraged impotence, where our boycotts and campaigns are really just one more way of saying, "I'm important; listen to me." Marriage is too important for that.
A Roman governor thought Jesus was weak when he refused to use imperial means of resistance. But Jesus' refusal to fight meant just the opposite of what Pilate assumed. "If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting," Jesus said (Jn. 18:36).
Let others fight Mammon with Mammon. Let's struggle against principalities and powers with the One thing they fear: a word of faithful witness that doesn't blink before power, but doesn't seek to imitate it either. With the confidence of those who have been vindicated by the resurrection of Christ, we don't need to be vindicated by the culture. That ought to free us to speak openly about what we believe, but with the gentleness of those who have nothing to prove. Let's not boycott our neighbors. Let's not picket or scream or bellow. Let's offer a cup of cold water, or maybe even a grande skinny vanilla latte, in Jesus' name.
I’ve been on the bandwagon for the last three years. Not one cent from me.
...another in a long line of lukewarm 21st Century ‘pastors’...
Sorry. Dr. Moore. I'll multitask. Why can't you?
I boycott Starbucks because their coffee is expensive and tastes like crap!
I like strong (meaning hypertension levels of caffeine) and the more you roast the bean, the stronger it tastes but the less caffeine it has.
I dislike their coffee because it tastes burnt to me. Second only to the pretentious menu system. Venti, yeah wonderful, what’s the Italian word for big cup strong caffeine and not burnt. Maybe if I knew it, I could get a decent cup of coffee there.
We have a Keurig machine which has pods. Seems like a good idea when you buy it and it has an unlimited number of types of pods including teas but it’s incredibly expensive when you use it. I’ve found the Donut house coffee gives me a sufficient amount of chest pain to know it’s working. Surprise, there are Starbuck pods and they are nasty and I loved my dad’s black gang coffee which could strip an engine’s grease.
“I don’t used burned coffee beans,”
There’s one inside the local Target, where I go for catfood and litter. The place smells like burnt coffee! Yuck! When I get coffee, I go to the Speedway station. Great coffee! Several blends. And for $1.49, I get more than I can drink.
If you haven’t been boycotting this despicable company for several years now, you’ll never get it.
Spoken like someone who likes hi mocha vente more than his moral compass.
Financing the enemy isn't the brightest strategy...
Unfortunately, faculty at some of the Baptist and Evangelical theological seminaries are lukewarm these days. Going the same way as most of the other seminaries, I’m afraid.
It’s not as if boycotting is an act of violence, as he almost seems to suggest.
If you are going to boycott one, then boycott all. That will put you in a cave without electricity. We have a progressive government/corporate complex with a monopoly.
It is a literal minefield out their in the market, and people of moral character will be wise to actively seek out those increasingly fewer companies who don’t bow to the sodomite Molech.
It’s hard work and inconvenient, but we have to do it.
If christians know how to speak to God, then they already know the answer to this one.
How about supporting companies that support normal marriage? They need the support. The left sets its sights on them and tries to destroy them.
Who's angry, 'Pastor'? I just don't feeling like buying the rope with which they want to hang me...
You may find this strange, but I have the ability to assign priorities, therefore, I can actually enjoy Starbucks (mainly because I don’t give a crap about anything other than their product), and I can like having choices for insurance or whether I want to pay for other people’s access to things.
Their coffee is very good. I also enjoy their Cafe Mocha and various seasonal drinks.
We must be different people, as I really don’t believe that Starbucks’ management will cause this country to sink.
i agree... their coffee is not terrible... i like strong coffee too... i would rather err on the side of too strong than too weak... but their coffee is wwaayyy overpriced... i think most of those here on FR who dislike Starbucks like coffee without all the added fluff like foam and steamed milk and flavors... now that you have stated you like Starbucks coffee, be prepared to hear that you must not know what good coffee is... whatever...
when i go to Starbucks, usually it is because i am meeting a friend there, or i have a meeting taking place there... i order a skinny latte or a plain black iced tea... sometimes i go because i have a gift card...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.