Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“A Lutheran Ordinariate? That’s a Bad Sign”
La Stampa-Vatican Insider ^ | 1-22-13 | Alessandro Speciale

Posted on 01/22/2013 9:28:25 AM PST by marshmallow

The Secretary of the International Lutheran Federation has rejected the proposal presented again about a day or so ago by the Prefect of the former Holy Office

An ordinariate for Lutherans who wish to re-enter into communion with the Vatican, whilst preserving their traditions at least partially? The idea of extending the solution offered by Pope Benedict XVI to groups of traditionalist Anglicans to followers of Martin Luther was suggested for the first time by the President of the Pontifical Council for Christian Unity, Cardinal Kurt Koch.

But just as the proposal is being put forward again by the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Mgr. Gerhard Ludwig Müller, it is beginning to trigger heated protests and concerns among the Catholic Church’s ecumenical partners –as happened with the Anglican Church.

The creation of an ordinariate – intended for those groups of Anglicans that wish to join the Catholic Church but also maintain their own identity – was “not Rome’s idea; it originates in the Anglican Church,” Koch said last 30 October. “The Holy Father looked for a solution and found a wide-reaching one which took into account the Anglican Church’s ecclesial and liturgical traditions. If the Lutherans made a similar request - he went on to say - we will have to consider their situation carefully. But the initiative remains in the hands of the Lutherans.”

The issue was recently addressed by Mgr. Müller. The German theologian chosen by Pope Benedict XVI to lead the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, recognised that the “Lutheran world is different to the Anglican one because Anglicanism has always had an element that is closer to Catholicism.” But this would not stop the Church from allowing Lutheran groups to convert to Catholicism, preserving “legitimate traditions developed” over the......

(Excerpt) Read more at vaticaninsider.lastampa.it ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Ecumenism; Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2013 9:28:29 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

:: followers of Martin Luther ::

Yo! Papa Benny! You just “lost” all the real Lutherans with that rhetoric.


2 posted on 01/22/2013 9:33:41 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

This Former Catholic turned Lutheran will never “go back” no matter how many articles like this are on FR.


3 posted on 01/22/2013 9:42:02 AM PST by Moonmad27 ("I'm not bad, I'm just drawn that way." Jessica Rabbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I am keeping an eye out on these folks:

http://www.nordiskkatolsk.no/Sentrale%20sider%20-%20engelsk/index.htm

Bishop Roald Flemstad spoke at Forward in Faith along with some of the flying bishops who are now in the English Ordinariate.


4 posted on 01/22/2013 9:45:47 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

That was the article’s author, not Benedict.

And not trying to be insulting here but just curious...why is that language so grating? Lutherans call themselves that. Anglicans never called themselves “Cranmerians” that I’m aware of.


5 posted on 01/22/2013 9:50:08 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
>> :: followers of Martin Luther :: <<

>> Yo! Papa Benny! You just “lost” all the real Lutherans with that rhetoric <<

Referring to Lutherans as "followers of Martin Luther" is inappropriate rhetoric? What would you suggest the Pope refer to them as? Should he also avoid referring to members of the Ayn Rand society as "followers of Ayn Rand"?

6 posted on 01/22/2013 10:01:30 AM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

:: followers of Martin Luther ::

Roman Catholicism, the Democrat Party of Christianity.


7 posted on 01/22/2013 10:07:20 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Keep your eye on this group too: http://anglolutherancatholic.org/ Their Archbishop Emeritus, Irl Gladfelter, has stepped down (health reasons I believe) and is trying to be recieved into the Catholic Church on his own.


8 posted on 01/22/2013 10:15:46 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy; Claud

So, would a Roman Catholic be insulted if they were termed as a “follower” of Il Papa; AKA a “papist”? I would say that, learning from the past, yes, in the extreme and enough to torture, beat and behead (The Spanish Inquisition).

(The Randian reference is non-sequitor when speaking of the church militant.)

Just a bad way to present a message regarding Faith and salvation.

He who believes and is baptized shall be saved. - Mark 16:16


9 posted on 01/22/2013 10:20:32 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

When did the Pope use “that rhetoric”?


10 posted on 01/22/2013 10:24:27 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

That argument can only be categorized as “Chicago-style”.

Do you really believe that Cd. Koch didn’t get his rhetoric approved by the Vatican?


11 posted on 01/22/2013 10:27:29 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; SecondAmendment
Rather than hurling incendiary rhetoric and brainless insults, you might try offering constructive comments on this forum.

You might even answer reasonable questions:

What, exactly, does "Lutheran" mean? What distinction are the "Lutheran Church Missouri Synod", "Evangelical Lutheran Church in America", "Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod" and similarly named bodies making when they label themselves "Lutheran"?

I note, by contrast, than no body or organization calls itself "papist".

12 posted on 01/22/2013 10:30:05 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

and we’ll throw in a 30% discount on Indulgences to sweeten the deal...


13 posted on 01/22/2013 10:30:26 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard; SecondAmendment

Your suggestion will be taken under consideration. Please don’t be offended if I reject it out-of-hand.


14 posted on 01/22/2013 10:32:50 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Bread and Circuses; Everyone to the Coliseum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

I’ve been called worse. :)


15 posted on 01/22/2013 10:40:09 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; SecondAmendment
Cletus, your behaviour does not offend me.

It informs me as to your worth, and to the worth of your particular religious sect, whatever it may be.

16 posted on 01/22/2013 10:40:29 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
That argument can only be categorized as “Chicago-style”.

Nice sidestep.

Do you really believe that Cd. Koch didn’t get his rhetoric approved by the Vatican?

Putting aside the fact that Cardinals do not get their words "pre-approved" by "the Vatican", can you tell me when Cardinal Koch used the rhetoric you're complaining of?

Searching German sites, he is quoted as referring to the Lutherans as "Lutherans", "the Lutheran tradition", "Lutheran communities", etc. and not as "followers of Martin Luther."

17 posted on 01/22/2013 10:40:56 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
No offense taken, I knew my post would be provocative, but it is an observation I have made through my conversion from a Catholic to a Lutheran.

Specifially:

This is of course not a blanket statement, there are many good Catholic lay people and Priests, but the issues I have listed are real and systematic within the Church.

Not to mention virtually all positions of the Church with the exception of Abortion and Birth Control are IDENTICAL to those of the Democrat Party (http://usccb.org).

18 posted on 01/22/2013 11:01:40 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Ok...very valid question. What does Lutheran mean? Lutheran belief is based on sola scriptura that the scripture is the only authority for salvation. That salvation was completed once and for all with Christ the sacrificial lamb of God living perfectly under the law and then becoming the sacrificial lamb to bear Gods wrath in my stead. Lutheran faith holds firm the Pauline text that it is by grace that we are saved through faith and not the works of our hands. Some criticize this stance that there are issues that address works in scripture with is true, but salvation is obtainable only through faith. Once saved, it becomes natural to want to do the works of God and love wholesome, but we understand all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (Romans). We also understand that we need no intercession before our Father in heaven as we may go to Him though God the son, a d that the Holy Spirit intercedes for us with sighs and groans beyond hima. Understanding. The triune God has God the father who creates us, God the son who saves us and God the Holy Spirit who sanctifies us with the confession that Jesus is Lord and Savior.

Luther originally set to reform the Catholic Church serving his 95 thesis on the door at the Church in Whittenburg. At that time the church was apostate among other things selling indulgences and claiming that this would purchase forgiveness of sin without repentance and subsequently salvation, at that time the pope excommunicated Luther, and at the diet of Worms Luther was given the opportunity to rescind his teachings, but stood on the Word of God and refused claiming the Word of God was inerrant and not subject to the papal interpretation. He further denied the diety of the pope. Upon excommunication, the Protestant movement was born with Lutherans becoming the first Protestant Christian church. Subsequent to this, Protestantism grew with Calvinism, Zwingli and other leaders of Protestant perspective from which are born Methodism and other denominations. All Protestants accept the low church perspective that priests and hierarchical men are not required to petition God and that our relationship is personal with God and not necessarily contingent on a relationship with a church body per se.

jJust as there are competing branches I. Catholicism ... Strict, reform, and other parts of the church, In the Lutheran church there are synods, some conservative (Wisconsin, Missouri, and LCMC Lutheran church in mission for Christ) and more liberal factions...namely the ELCA. Approximately four years ago at the biennial ELCA council a schism occurred when the very livable bishop of St. Paul rammed down the throat by a single vote a statement of bound conscious and human sexuality that essentially made blessing of gay marriage allowed. This also moved the standards and covenants of ministry to include monogamous homosexual clergy. Many, including myself, saw this as an apostasy and our individual congregations left the ELCA. This synod continues to be dwindling based on men not scripture...sort of what happened all the way back in 1517 Germany.

Whatever the perspective, we are Christian first accepting the perfection of salvation in Christ crucified the real presence of Christ at holy communion, and believe that we can only be saved by faith as presented in the Bible...the law telling us how we should love, and the gospel proclaiming the good news of salvation when we fail. We then practice our faith by the great commission of going and proclaiming the good news to all, baptizing in the name of the triune God.

and for my Lutheran friends they will understand this little joke...this is most certainly true :)

19 posted on 01/22/2013 11:02:30 AM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Fair question, I belong to the Missouri Synod, and I think they can best answer some of your questions:

http://www.lcms.org/

20 posted on 01/22/2013 11:05:32 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

I wouldn’t be offended. “Papist” is an insult from non-Catholics.

I don’t see why ‘follower of Martin Luther’ is an insult to Lutherans. You’ll have to enlighten me.


21 posted on 01/22/2013 11:08:48 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr
With respect ... you have told me what Lutherans believe. Thank you for that. What you haven't answered is what the word "Lutheran" itself actually means.

Objectively, it would seem to mean a follower of someone named "Luther", in the same way as "Jeffersonian" means a follower of someone named "Jefferson" or "Platonist" means a follower of someone named "Plato". This seems inoffensive ... certainly does not deny the possibility that the Lutheran follows Luther (etc.) in mutual pursuit of some greater good.

Yet we see up-thread folks (who may not even be Lutheran) objecting rather rudely to this understanding of the meaning of the word.

So I ask, what does the word itself mean? Why use it? What distinction does it make?

22 posted on 01/22/2013 11:11:30 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
The Church dismisses all Protestant criticisms with Ad-Homeinem attacks, never addressing the actual substance of any arguments.

While I disagree with most of what you wrote, a good portion of it is a matter of personal opinion - except for this.

This statement is demonstrably false and should be obviously false to anyone who stops and thinks about it for one second.

Numerous Catholic theologians have spent long years explaining in great detail the substantial arguments against Protestant criticisms of the Church.

To ignore this fact is to ignore much of the history of the Reformation itself.

23 posted on 01/22/2013 11:12:13 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
I belong to the Missouri Synod

OK ... do you call yourself "Lutheran"? If so, what do you mean by that word? What distinction does it make?

24 posted on 01/22/2013 11:14:26 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; Cletus.D.Yokel
If I called you “A follower of Benedict XVI”, what would you think?

Lutherans identify with “Followers of Jesus Christ”. The point being is that Luther was not/is not infallible. We don't claim that.

And considering that this site has some who constantly claim that
1. Lutherans are not “real” Christians.
2. Lutherans worship Luther.

I can see some getting touchy about it. In fact I expect a few to arrive shortly, who will start saying that Lutherans (and all non Roman Catholics) are indeed damned.

In other words, welcome to the religion forum. Poo gets thrown here.

25 posted on 01/22/2013 11:16:20 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Meant to pin you to my last post. Sorry.


26 posted on 01/22/2013 11:17:35 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gas_dr

Presumably the ELCA are ‘followers of Sodom’, since Luther never preached that sodomy is a virtue.

“At that time the church was apostate among other things selling indulgences and claiming that this would purchase forgiveness of sin without repentance and subsequently salvation”

Indulgences are given for the dead, not for the person themselves. You don’t take out an indulgence for forgiveness of your sins.

“at that time the pope excommunicated Luther, and at the diet of Worms Luther was given the opportunity to rescind his teachings”

You’ve got it backwards - Luther’s 95 theses, about 75 were accepted by the Church. 14 or so were rejected. Luther was instructed to retain the 75 and rescind the 14 which were contrary to what the Church teaches. He refused.

“claiming the Word of God was inerrant and not subject to the papal interpretation.”

Given that he was a member of the magisterium and had teaching authority, such an argument is fatal to his own authority. One cannot divide one’s own authority as a priest from the Pope, they are one and the same.

“He further denied the diety of the pope.”

Something no Catholic believes, then or now.

“Upon excommunication, the Protestant movement was born”

Munster occurred two years prior to Luther’s excommunication, FWIW.

“All Protestants accept the low church perspective that priests and hierarchical men are not required to petition God and that our relationship is personal with God and not necessarily contingent on a relationship with a church body per se.”

Catholics believe that one can petition God without a priest, and that salvation doesn’t require one to be a member of the Catholic church, or any church for that matter.


27 posted on 01/22/2013 11:19:02 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Thanks for the ping ...

Can you answer my question?

What does the word "Lutheran" mean? What distinction is meant by those who use it?

28 posted on 01/22/2013 11:19:23 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Why would I be offended? That is what I am - I have a duty to be obedient to Papa Benedict.

“The point being is that Luther was not/is not infallible. We don’t claim that.”

You claim the bible is inerrant and at the same time use Luther’s canon. Ergo, you are followers of Luther and his teachings.


29 posted on 01/22/2013 11:21:07 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
"Confessional" is generally the term orthodox Lutherans use in reference to themselves. The Lutheran confession of faith is contained in the Book of Concord, first published in 1580. While much of the work in this book was written by Martin Luther, much of it wasn't. The principal statement of faith, the Augsburgh Confession was written by Philp Melanchthon.

The term "Lutheran" originated as a perjorative which was eventually accepted by members of the faith because it was reasonably descriptive and, besides, it's much easier to pronounce than Melanchthonians.

30 posted on 01/22/2013 11:24:15 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I would be happy to read some of the Church's defense against Protestant criticism.

My statements are from personal experience and research, but the history of the Church and the Protestant Reformation can get pretty complicated to follow when attempting to sort it out for yourself.

Can you recommend something for me to look at ?

31 posted on 01/22/2013 11:26:07 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
"That rhetoric" is Alessandro Speciale's rhetoric. If you want to complain that a reporter for La Stampa has offended Lutherans, fine ... but who cares?

"Papa Benny" didn't give the interview Speciale describes, Cardinal Koch did. It was an interview, not a formal document, so obviously it wasn't reviewed by anybody in the Vatican. The actual interview is here. You'll note that Cardinal Koch uses the word ... get this ... "LUTHERANS". Ghastly!

This thread is a good example of why FReepers need to actually *read* *and* *understand* *primary* *sources* rather than going off half-cocked based on every ill-considered word from the pen of a journalist.

32 posted on 01/22/2013 11:28:09 AM PST by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
The creation of an ordinariate – intended for those groups of Anglicans that wish to join the Catholic Church but also maintain their own identity – was “not Rome’s idea; it originates in the Anglican Church,”

If someone goes to Rome, they should do it whole hog and eyes open. Pray'n to saints and Mary, indulgences, statues, superstitions and scapulars, all of it.

33 posted on 01/22/2013 11:28:40 AM PST by Lee N. Field ("You keep using that verse, but I do not think it means what you think it means." --I. Montoya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

That’s a reasonable explanation. Thank you. No intent to offend, having never been a Lutheran myself. A denominination ought to be defined by it’s confessionals, and Augsburgians is appropriate.


34 posted on 01/22/2013 11:29:28 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge; ArrogantBustard
Traditionally, in North America (an important caveat), “Lutheran” means those synods who came from the original Reformation that hold as their base teachings the Book of Concord and the Augsburg Confession.

In Germany and other Baltic states, those synods are often called “Evangelical”. They do not often call themselves Lutheran. In some places that is a slur on the level of “Papist”, and “Fisheater”. In most of North America (NA), that isn't the case.

JCB, I suggest you research the Lutheran (using the NA term) canon pre WWI. My great uncle's Bible has the same books you do included in the Apocrypha. In confirmation, we got most of the books as separate handouts (excluding Tobit, if I remember right. Didn't have time for it).

And saying you follow BXVI to some here will get screams. During WWI, Wilson forcibly changed the Lutheran canon and liturgy to match that of the Episcopal churches.

35 posted on 01/22/2013 11:30:36 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All
The Dictionary tells me that "Lutheran" means:

1. of or pertaining to Luther, adhering to his doctrines, or belonging to one of the Protestant churches that bear his name.
2. a follower of Luther or an adherent of his doctrines; a member of the Lutheran Church.

1. a follower of Martin Luther or a member of a Lutheran Church
2. of or relating to Luther or his doctrines, the most important being justification by faith alone, consubstantiation, and the authority of the Bible
3. of or denoting any Protestant Church that follows Luther's doctrines

Does anybody on this thread disagree with any of these definitions? If so, why?

36 posted on 01/22/2013 11:37:43 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Augsburgians. That has a nice ring to it.

Traditionally, congregations of the Missouri Synod would inscribe the initials UAC in the cornerstone of each new church building to signify the congregation's fealty to the Unaltered Augsburg Confession.

37 posted on 01/22/2013 11:43:08 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Moonmad27

Are you Lutheran Church Missouri Synod or ELCA? (Just curious.)


38 posted on 01/22/2013 11:43:57 AM PST by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment
The core foundational work was St. Robert Cardinal Bellarmine's Disputations on Controversies in four volumes, published in the 1580s, which systematically goes through Luther, Melanchthon and Calvin's arguments regarding the papacy, the Mass, justification and Scripture.

Theodore Beza and John Rainolds (the most prominent English Puritan theologian before the Restoration) wrote extensive replies to Bellarmine, as did the High Anglican Lancelot Andrewes.

There are also the three volumes of St. Peter Canisius - The Summary of Christian Doctrine and the works of St. Lawrence of Brindisi whose three volumes of Controversies address matters of Protestant exegesis in detail.

These are difficult to find today, especially online, but they comprise thousands of pages of closely reasoned arguments.

More recent books that are readily available are such works as By What Authority? by Mark Shea, If Protestantism is True by Devin Rose and Pillars of Sola Scriptura by Dave Armstrong, among many, many others.

39 posted on 01/22/2013 11:44:34 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

“And saying you follow BXVI to some here will get screams.”

One could certainly do worse.

“During WWI, Wilson forcibly changed the Lutheran canon and liturgy to match that of the Episcopal churches.”

That I did not know. Wilson was an evil man for many reasons.

“JCB, I suggest you research the Lutheran (using the NA term) canon pre WWI. My great uncle’s Bible has the same books you do included in the Apocrypha. In confirmation, we got most of the books as separate handouts (excluding Tobit, if I remember right. Didn’t have time for it).”

This is probably the greatest division between us. If that is the case, this makes me hopeful for the future. :) I see collaboration as possible between the Missouri Synod, those who are ‘Evangelical’, in the sense that they have retained the true teachings of Christ and, yes, Luther. And not the ECLA which is unworthy of the name.


40 posted on 01/22/2013 11:45:08 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

We don’t “follow” Martin Luther. We follow Christ. Luther is in many ways inspirational but some of his teachings we reject utterly.


41 posted on 01/22/2013 11:46:11 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Thanks for your recommendations.

I bet this dovetails with my latest study of the early history of the Church.

42 posted on 01/22/2013 11:48:40 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
The same dictionary defines the term Papist as: a Roman Catholic, yet that's not a term Roman Catholics would ordinarily welcome in a civil conversation with members of other faith groups.
43 posted on 01/22/2013 11:51:08 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
The same dictionary defines the term Papist as: a Roman Catholic and notes that the term is "usually disparaging". It makes no such note about the term "Lutheran". Furthermore, I can drive about my local area and find numerous examples of buildings labeled "[Something] Lutheran Church", or similarly "[Something] Catholic Church" or even "[Something] Roman Catholic Church".

I have yet to see any group or organization label itself "Papist".

So: are there any definitions of "Lutheran" given in that dictionary with which you disagree, or that you find offensive?

44 posted on 01/22/2013 12:00:26 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

See #41.


45 posted on 01/22/2013 12:04:41 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Lee N. Field
(1) By "own identity" what is meant is the traditional practices of Lutheran culture - including liturgical forms and hymns, their calendar of holidays, traditional vestments, their historic translation of the Scriptures, etc.

(2) Catholics do not "pray to" the saints or Our Lady.

Nor do we hold to superstitions.

And both Lutheran and Catholic churches have statuary. They're not mosques.

46 posted on 01/22/2013 12:09:46 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I have seen Lutheran churches with a St Frances statue.

Seemed odd, till I studied the history. Those churches came from Southern Germany/Saxony.

47 posted on 01/22/2013 12:18:53 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

Of course: “Followers of Martin Luther” is equivalent to defining Roman Catholics as Followers of the Pope, or Papists. Martin Luther had a number of personal characteristics and beliefs which are not indicative of doctrine of Lutheran churches, just as Popes of the time had personal habits which did not reflect or become doctrines of your faith.


48 posted on 01/22/2013 12:22:06 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Seems to me the gist of the issue at hand is this: no single person or entity speaks for something called “Lutheranism”. Not individual Lutherans nor the heads of the various splinter synods. If individual Lutheran congregations (or even groups of congregations) became disgruntled with Lutheranism for whatever reason and approached the Vatican for an Anglican-type ordinariate, there would be nothing or no one within Lutheranism to stop them. If other Lutherans are confident in the truth of their beliefs, then they shouldn’t fear any type of voluntary exodus from their church. That’s what Protestants always say to Catholics, anyway.


49 posted on 01/22/2013 12:36:25 PM PST by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

I see...I am sorry for the exegesis :-)...I think Lutheran merely is the flavor of protestantism. I could be an Adams Republican, a Payne Libertarian, I am a doctor, but designate myself as a critical care anesthesiologist to delineate what kind of doctor I am...I suppose it is appropriate to refer to myself as an allopath to distinguish my practice and training from that of osteopath — both equal in the site of the license boards. I think it is not whom we follow, for we follow the triune God, but just designates the finer point of our philosophy...


50 posted on 01/22/2013 12:38:25 PM PST by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson