Skip to comments.Ancient Testimonies Against Abortion
Posted on 08/09/2012 2:24:57 PM PDT by iowamark
In doing research for an Our Sunday Visitor column (my regular Q and A column), I found it necessary to comb through some of the early Church sources regarding the teaching against abortion. I thought it might be helpful here, by way of a resource, to post some of those teachings here. While I have seen a quote here and there, I was actually quite pleased to find several quotes I had not seen or read before on the question of abortion and to assemble in one place a good number of quotes.
I also ask your help in adding to the list I have assembled here. For the sake of some scope I have limited the quotes to generally no later than the 4th Century. While you can feel free to add from later periods as well, I find the early centuries to be of particular value, due to their antiquity.
As with many quotes from the ancient world, some of the quotes herein are perhaps quite harsh, and some may be critiqued at their focus essentially on the women who procure abortion, with little mention of the men involved. In our own time the Church is more careful to articulate and understand that abortion often occurs when women are under duress, or on account of family crisis, poverty and other social factors. Hence, we who speak against abortion must be ready and able, as I think the Church admirably is, to assist women and families in crisis to give birth. Yet the churchmen who are quoted below were men of their times, and, as my father was often heard to say of the old days Things were tough all over.
Whatever the tone, the teaching is not at all unclear, and for this we can be grateful.
A couple of years ago a former Speaker of the House, whose name need not be mentioned here at all, showed herself an amateur theologian lacking in even basic knowledge by claiming (on what she called Jesuitical authority) that the Church teaching on abortion was no older than the 1950s. The usually cautious American Bishops lost no time in issuing vigorous correction. And rightly so, of course, as quotes like these will show.
Here then are some of the quotes:
The Didache (The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) ca 110 AD. Thou shalt not murder a child by abortion. (2:2) The Way of Death is filled with people who are murderers of children and abortionists of Gods creatures. (5:1-2)
Letter of Barnabas, circa 125: You shall not kill either the fetus by abortion or the new born
Athenagoras the Athenian (To Marcus Aurelius), ca 150 AD: We say that those women who use drugs to bring on abortion commit murder, and will have to give an account to God for the abortion , [For we] regard the very ftus in the womb as a created being, and therefore an object of Gods care (# 35).
Clement of Alexandria: (circa 150 215 AD) Our whole life can go on in observation of the laws of nature, if we gain dominion over our desires from the beginning and if we do not kill, by various means of a perverse art, the human offspring, born according to the designs of divine providence; for these women who, if order to hide their immorality, use abortive drugs which expel the child completely dead, abort at the same time their own human feelings. Paedagogus, 2
Tertullian circa 160-240 AD: For us, we may not destroy even the fetus in the womb, while as yet the human being derives blood from other parts of the body for its sustenance. To hinder a birth is merely a speedier man-killing; nor does it matter when you take away a life that is born, or destroy one that is coming to birth. That is a man which is going to be one: you have the fruit already in the seed. Apology 9:6
Tertullian (circa 160 240 AD): we are not permitted, since murder has been prohibited to us once and for all, even to destroy the fetus in the womb. It makes no difference whether one destroys a life that has already been born or one that is in the process of birth. Apology (9:7-8)
Tertullian circa 160-240 AD: [John the Baptist and Jesus] were both alive while still in the womb. Elizabeth rejoiced as the infant leaped in her womb; Mary glorifies the Lord because Christ within inspired her. Each mother recognizes her child and is known by her child who is alive, being not merely souls but also spirits. De Aninta 26:4
Hippolytus (circa 170-236 AD): Whence certain women, reputed believers, began to resort to drugs for producing sterility and to gird themselves round, so as to expel what was conceived on account of their not wanting to have a child either by a slave or by any paltry fellow, for the sake of their family and excessive wealth. Behold, into how great impiety that lawless one has proceeded, by inculcating adultery and murder at the same time. From Refutation of all Heresies 9:7
Minucius Felix (180 225 AD): Some women take medicines to destroy the germ of future life in their own bodies. They commit infanticide before they have given birth to the infant (Octavious (30, 2))
St. Basil the Great (330 379 AD): The woman who purposely destroys her unborn child is guilty of murder. With us there is no nice enquiry as to its being formed or unformed. In this case it is not only the being about to be born who is vindicated, but the woman in her attack upon herself; because in most cases women who make such attempts die. The destruction of the embryo is an additional crime, a second murder, at all events if we regard it as done with intent. The punishment, however, of these women should not be for life, but for the term of ten years. And let their treatment depend not on mere lapse of time, but on the character of their repentance. Letter 188:2
St. Ambrose: (339 to 397 AD) The poor expose their children, the rich kill the fruit of their own bodies in the womb, lest their property be divided up, and they destroy their own children in the womb with murderous poisons. and before life has been passed on, it is annihilated. Hexaemeron, (5, 18, 58)
St. John Chrysostom (circa 340 407 AD): Why sow where the ground makes it its care to destroy the fruit? Where there are many efforts at abortion? Where there is murder before the birth? For you do not even let the harlot remain a mere harlot, but make her a murderer also. You see how drunkenness leads to whoredom, whoredom to adultery, adultery to murder; or rather something even worse than murder. For I have no real name to give it, since it does not destroy the thing born but prevents its being born. Why then do you abuse the gift of God and fight with His laws, and follow after what is a curse as if a blessing, and make the place of procreation a chamber for murder, and arm the woman that was given for childbearing unto slaughter? Homily 24 on Romans
St. Jerome (circa 342-420 AD): I cannot bring myself to speak of the many virgins who daily fall and are lost to the bosom of the church, their mother .Some go so far as to take potions, that they may insure barrenness, and thus murder human beings almost before their conception. Some, when they find themselves with child through their sin, use drugs to procure abortion, and when (as often happens) they die with their offspring, they enter the lower world laden with the guilt not only of adultery against Christ but also of suicide and child murder. Letter 22:13
The Synod of Elvira, 306 AD: If a woman becomes pregnant by committing adultery, while her husband is absent, and after the act she destroys the child, it is proper to keep her from communion until death, because she has doubled her crime. Canon 63.
The Synod of Ancyra, 314 AD, Concerning women who commit fornication, and destroy that which they have conceived, or who are employed in making drugs for abortion, a former decree excluded them until the hour of death, and to this some have assented. Nevertheless, being desirous to use somewhat greater lenity, we have ordained that they fulfill ten years [of penance], according to the prescribed degrees. (Canon 21).
Council of Trullo (692 AD): Those who give drugs for procuring abortion, and those who receive poisons to kill the ftus, are subjected to the penalty of murder. (Canon 91)
Ancient Testimonies against abortion. Please add to this list.
He wasn’t a Christian but even a Greek physician knew inherently that abortion was wrong. That is why he included a ban on abortion in his oath which new doctors took and take.
I suspect modern medical schools have eliminated the abortion part.
Thanks for posting.
You are referring to the Hippocratic Oath, which did forbid abortion and euthanasia. Today’s physicians usually take a vague oath to obey the law or something similar.
I saw this last night and found it fascinating. I knew that abortion had been mentioned in the Didache, the forerunner of the Nicene Creed, but I wasn’t aware of some of the other quotes.
Treasure post! Thanks.
am under the impression either Aquinas or Assisi was pretty much agnostic on the subject.
Have you ever read The Third Time Around by George Grant?
At least peruse the first chapter:
I’ll have other stuff for you later. This computer is in bad shape.
St. Basil’s comments were quite interesting. Thanks for posting this.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
What gave you that impression? Something you read by St. Thomas or St. Francis?
There has been a question of when ensoulment of the baby in the womb occurs. This is not the same as validating abortion even prior to the putative ensoulment.
Certainly either saint is entitled to their opinion; that wouldn’t make it the opinion of the Church. However, I would like to know what is the source of your impression.
and as I reflect while writing this I am reminded that the devil rattles the brush to distract one from the forest. Or something like that. That is, the debate about when a life begins is just a distraction which keeps people tied up while more and more lives are ended and ruined.
You make a great point -- thank you.
ping for later
I listened to James McDonald just yesterday on the topic:
Good resource. Thanks...
More so today, when we learned to split heirs over moral issues, than in St. Thomas's time. The intent is still to murder; the late ensoulment provides a legalistic loophole. The penalties for abortion were indeed lesser in that case, I believe, but moral ambivalence it was not, merely a legalism.
Today, as well, we are likely to demand, once justice is restored, different penalties for abortion accounting for the counseling the "mother" had received. We do so in case of any murder.