Posted on 11/05/2011 12:36:05 PM PDT by NYer
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), chair of the Democratic National Committee, said Thursday that for states to enact constitutional amendments that say human life begins at conception is “an extreme and radical step.”
“For the vast majority of Americans, including people on both sides of the abortion issue, this is an extreme and radical step,” she said.
Speaking to reporters on a conference call, Wasserman Schultz said that so-called personhood amendments are a “divisive, dangerous, and destructive” attack on women.
No, Shultz does not mention the Catholic Church or Catholic teaching. But what she renounces in such strong terms—the belief that human life begins at conception—is a clear, emphatic, and consistent teaching of the Catholic Church:
Endowed with "a spiritual and immortal" soul, the human person is "the only creature on earth that God has willed for its own sake." From his conception, he is destined for eternal beatitude. (Catechism of the Catholic Church, par. 1703; cf. 1711)
Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person - among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life. (CCC, par. 2270)
For God, the Lord of life, has conferred on men the surpassing ministry of safeguarding life in a manner which is worthy of man. Therefore from the moment of its conception life must be guarded with the greatest care while abortion and infanticide are unspeakable crimes. (Gaudium et spes, 51)
On its part, the Magisterium of the Church offers to human reason in this field too the light of Revelation: the doctrine concerning man taught by the Magisterium contains many elements which throw light on the problems being faced here. From the moment of conception, the life of every human being is to be respected in an absolute way because man is the only creature on earth that God has "wished for himself " (16) and the spiritual soul of each man is "immediately created" by God; (17) his whole being bears the image of the Creator. Human life is sacred because from its beginning it involves "the creative action of God" (18) and it remains forever in a special relationship with she Creator, who is its sole end.(19) God alone is the Lord of life from its beginning until its end: no one can, in any circumstance, claim for himself the right to destroy directly an innocent human being. (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Donum vitae)
Note especially the direct and unwavering language used in the 1987 document, Donum vitae, issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger:
However, the inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected by civil society and the political authority. These human rights depend neither on single individuals nor on parents; nor do they represent a concession made by society and the State: they pertain to human nature and are inherent in the person by virtue of the creative act from which the person took his of her origin. Among such fundamental rights one should mention in this regard:
a) every human being's right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception until death; b) the rights of the family and of marriage as an institution and, in this area, the child's right to be conceived, brought into the world and brought up by his parents. To each of these two themes it is necessary here to give some further consideration.
In various States certain laws have authorized the direct suppression of innocents: the moment a positive law deprives a category of human beings of the protection which civil legislation must accord them, the State is denying the equality of all before the law. When the State does not place its power at the service of the rights of each citizen, and in particular of the more vulnerable, the very foundations of a State based on law are undermined. (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Donum vitae)
Radical!
Debbie Wasserman Schultz: Saying Life Begins at Conception Is ‘Extreme and Radical’
Can’t stand that woman..
Surely Debbie was talking about the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, Jr.
How do people get reverend and doctor titles without attending universities or siminaries?
If she had said “islam”, she would have been right on.
And I don’t need a bimbo telling me anything, especially about religion.
Debra Schultz, why don't YOU do something drastic and extreme and get a makeover?
feh...
Why is this not a surprise? She relishes her roll as the DNC attack dog.
Somebody grab that woman and make her attend an abortion procedure.
Wright has a number of degrees and graduated from several universities. He's well educated, which goes to show that years of education do nothing for commonsense.
“Wright” you are. Thanks.
That said, Rev Al and Rev Jesse, where did they get their reverend credentials?
Ah...but, the Muslim religion is good for women. So is the communist / democratic parties.
Of course, they want to destroy the Catholic Church, because they remind people about our GOD-GIVEN rights.
Catholic Theology is in line with Natural Law Theory—the fundamental philosophy which girds our Constitution. St. Thomas made Catholic Theology fit into the Natural Law Theory—he figured, anything God designed should not disagree with Catholic Theology. That is why all Christianity was such a great fit for the Founders philosophy.
In other words, our laws should reflect Catholic ideas because Natural Law Theory is the basis of our Laws-—Natural Right come from God-—is what is fundamental to our legal system.
Our laws should be against perversion and evil—not because of Catholic Theology but because of Natural Law Theory-—”Right Reason according to Nature”. Homosexual marriage and pederasty and abortions are all against nature and reason and logic. Common sense is one aspect of Natural Law—and the Catholic Church is vilified because they will NOT bend and adopt EVIL just because of the pederasts and homosexuals and atheists desires.
I can’t help but wonder how ANY Catholic can be associate themselves with the Democrat party and why more Catholics don’t speak out against this highly offensive language coming out of the left wing of the party.
In essence, they have just been told that they must choose between the the DNC (Democrat party) or their religion.
I’m so glad the Dems have people like this ignorant slut to show people how looney and ******* up they are.
...with her as the fetus.
Who the hell cares what she thinks? I don’t agree with her. Worship the way you want.
But I bet she loves her Muslim brothers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.