Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Episcopal bishop opens door to Catholics
Baltimore Sun ^ | October 30, 2009 | Matthew Hay Brown

Posted on 10/30/2009 9:31:19 AM PDT by Gamecock

In the wake of Vatican plans to make it easier for Episcopalians to become Catholic, the Episcopal bishop of Maryland would like to make one point clear: The door swings both ways.

Lost in talk of the splintering of the Anglican Communion, Bishop Eugene Taylor Sutton says, is the appeal that the 45,000-member Episcopal Diocese of Maryland has held for former Roman Catholics and others looking for a big-tent church.

While attention focused on the conversion en masse last month of a Catonsville-based order of Episcopal nuns to the Catholic Archdiocese of Baltimore, the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland has received three former Roman Catholic clergy in the past couple of months, Sutton says.

(Excerpt) Read more at baltimoresun.com ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholic; ecusa; episcopal; maryland; religiousleft; schism; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 10/30/2009 9:31:20 AM PDT by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I hope what’s left of the homosexuals who infiltrated the seminaries and the clergy take the Anglican up on his offer.


2 posted on 10/30/2009 9:33:41 AM PDT by IbJensen (If Catholic voters were true to their faith there would be no abortion and no President Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Exactly!!!!

And the Kennedys and Pelosi etc.

Hey, can we make a list and boot them all over there?


3 posted on 10/30/2009 9:35:34 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Great! Ridding ourselves of CINO’s is good!

One thing about the Catholic Church, they don’t change their doctrine to suit the whims of the liberal congregants. It is how Jesus found it! Thank you Lord!


4 posted on 10/30/2009 9:35:51 AM PDT by notaliberal (Right-wing extremist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

My previously Episcopalian mother-in-law got so disgusted with her church this summer that she just said screw it and became full-blown Catholic.


5 posted on 10/30/2009 9:35:57 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; narses

Good News Ping!

Some would be happier elsewhere.


6 posted on 10/30/2009 9:36:15 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

The problem is they won’t go. Many people for years have been urging these CINOs (Catholics In Name Only) to go take up residence in the nearest Episcopal church, but instead they want to stay and make life miserable for all of us in the Catholic Church.


7 posted on 10/30/2009 9:36:48 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Lord Love her!


8 posted on 10/30/2009 9:36:49 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

He should get his own senator and abortionist, Barbara Mikulski, and neighbor Joe Biden, along with Leahy, Casey and other CINOs. They long ago left the Catholics and are wandering in some NOW purgatory.


9 posted on 10/30/2009 9:38:21 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

YES!!!!!


(See tagline.)

10 posted on 10/30/2009 9:40:48 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (A trade: Conservative Anglicans for Liberal Catholics and a heretic to be named later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
So gay pro choice Catholics now have a home.

Isn't that special...

Wonder if they will extend it to Methodist as well...

11 posted on 10/30/2009 9:44:39 AM PDT by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Let’s see—trading liberal/heretical Catholics for conservative Anglicans.

You’ve got a deal!


12 posted on 10/30/2009 9:45:23 AM PDT by I-ambush (I didn't think, I never dreamed, that I would be around to see it all come true-McCartney and Wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
"The church was wrong on slavery - many parts of the church," he said. "The church was wrong in the Crusades. The church was wrong with Galileo. The church was wrong with women. The church was wrong with people of a different so-called race. The church, increasingly, we find it was wrong with people who are oriented toward the same gender.

Sort of sad this Bishop is so ignorant of the Church and history.

1: Has the good Bishop ever heard of Bartoleme de las Casas or Wilberforce? Why did slavery first end in the Christian west?

2: Does the Bishop know the Pope called for the Crusades because the Muzzies dealt a devastating defeat on Byzantium and it was a call from help from Constantinople that lead to the call for the Crusades?

3: Galileo got into trouble because he was going against the prevailing SCIENTIFIC view at the time. I ask the good Bishop why did science flourish in Christian West as opposed to dying in the Muzzie world?

4: The development of the Church was a imporvement in the status of women compared to the Roman world. Once again why did the concept of women's rights develop in the West while women are treated as chattel in the Muzzie world?

5: If the Bishop read his Bible he would know from acts that one of the first converts was from Ethiopia. I refer back to De La Casas and Wilberforce. The greatest slavers in history were the Muzzie Arabs. How has Christianity has spread to all corners of the world if it is so racist?

6: Obviously the Bishop does not read the Bible when it comes to its consistent condemnation of homosexual acts.

13 posted on 10/30/2009 9:45:47 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Episcopal bishop of Maryland would like to make one point clear: The door swings both ways.

Unfortunate choice of words considering that it's probably the gay priests that they'll get and they have a gay bishop.

14 posted on 10/30/2009 9:46:20 AM PDT by tricky_k_1972 (Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
The Episcopal Bishop "opens the door"??

Oh yeah, I mean it's so difficult to join the Episcopal Church, isn't it? I mean entry requirements are so stringent!! It's not as if any Tom, Dick or Harry who believes any old nonsense can be admitted is it?

Can you say "stunt"?

15 posted on 10/30/2009 9:55:27 AM PDT by marshmallow ("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
As vast as the differences between the most conservative Catholics and the most liberal Episcopalians, the services have a similarity which makes movement comfortable for those unhappy with their church. Many Protestant services would seem foreign to someone raised a Catholic. My grandfather was a very conservative Episcopalian minister, who got booted in the early sixties from Washington DC to the far hinterland because the Episcopal Church had started it's liberal swing way back then. His character and sense of loyalty would never of allowed him to switch churches. He definitely would not of been comfortable with the Episcopal Church today. He would, as he always did, minister faithfully to those the Lord put in his care. As to myself, I believe that some relationship with the divine is better then none, regardless of politics.
16 posted on 10/30/2009 9:55:51 AM PDT by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

If I ever need my female bishop to introduce me to other hot guys, I will be sure to call....


17 posted on 10/30/2009 10:02:21 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Now, now, now. There you go letting facts get in the way of a good rant of moral superiority. Sheesh.


18 posted on 10/30/2009 10:03:25 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I’m trying to decide between hysterical or pathetic.


19 posted on 10/30/2009 10:05:32 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

LOL! I wonder which offer will have the most takers? I hope the queers, pedophiles, womynpriests and wreckovators all take him up on it and good riddance.


20 posted on 10/30/2009 10:11:17 AM PDT by redhead (They are running SCARED, folks! :o) Check out the Halfbaked Sourdough at mukluk.wordpress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson