1 posted on
10/30/2009 9:31:20 AM PDT by
Gamecock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Gamecock
I hope what’s left of the homosexuals who infiltrated the seminaries and the clergy take the Anglican up on his offer.
2 posted on
10/30/2009 9:33:41 AM PDT by
IbJensen
(If Catholic voters were true to their faith there would be no abortion and no President Obama.)
To: Gamecock
Great! Ridding ourselves of CINO’s is good!
One thing about the Catholic Church, they don’t change their doctrine to suit the whims of the liberal congregants. It is how Jesus found it! Thank you Lord!
4 posted on
10/30/2009 9:35:51 AM PDT by
notaliberal
(Right-wing extremist)
To: Gamecock
My previously Episcopalian mother-in-law got so disgusted with her church this summer that she just said screw it and became full-blown Catholic.
To: NYer; narses
Good News Ping!
Some would be happier elsewhere.
6 posted on
10/30/2009 9:36:15 AM PDT by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: Gamecock
The problem is they won’t go. Many people for years have been urging these CINOs (Catholics In Name Only) to go take up residence in the nearest Episcopal church, but instead they want to stay and make life miserable for all of us in the Catholic Church.
7 posted on
10/30/2009 9:36:48 AM PDT by
livius
To: Gamecock
He should get his own senator and abortionist, Barbara Mikulski, and neighbor Joe Biden, along with Leahy, Casey and other CINOs. They long ago left the Catholics and are wandering in some NOW purgatory.
9 posted on
10/30/2009 9:38:21 AM PDT by
oldbill
To: Gamecock
10 posted on
10/30/2009 9:40:48 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(A trade: Conservative Anglicans for Liberal Catholics and a heretic to be named later.)
To: Gamecock
So gay pro choice Catholics now have a home.
Isn't that special...
Wonder if they will extend it to Methodist as well...
To: Gamecock
Let’s see—trading liberal/heretical Catholics for conservative Anglicans.
You’ve got a deal!
12 posted on
10/30/2009 9:45:23 AM PDT by
I-ambush
(I didn't think, I never dreamed, that I would be around to see it all come true-McCartney and Wings)
To: Gamecock
"The church was wrong on slavery - many parts of the church," he said. "The church was wrong in the Crusades. The church was wrong with Galileo. The church was wrong with women. The church was wrong with people of a different so-called race. The church, increasingly, we find it was wrong with people who are oriented toward the same gender.Sort of sad this Bishop is so ignorant of the Church and history.
1: Has the good Bishop ever heard of Bartoleme de las Casas or Wilberforce? Why did slavery first end in the Christian west?
2: Does the Bishop know the Pope called for the Crusades because the Muzzies dealt a devastating defeat on Byzantium and it was a call from help from Constantinople that lead to the call for the Crusades?
3: Galileo got into trouble because he was going against the prevailing SCIENTIFIC view at the time. I ask the good Bishop why did science flourish in Christian West as opposed to dying in the Muzzie world?
4: The development of the Church was a imporvement in the status of women compared to the Roman world. Once again why did the concept of women's rights develop in the West while women are treated as chattel in the Muzzie world?
5: If the Bishop read his Bible he would know from acts that one of the first converts was from Ethiopia. I refer back to De La Casas and Wilberforce. The greatest slavers in history were the Muzzie Arabs. How has Christianity has spread to all corners of the world if it is so racist?
6: Obviously the Bishop does not read the Bible when it comes to its consistent condemnation of homosexual acts.
13 posted on
10/30/2009 9:45:47 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: Gamecock
Episcopal bishop of Maryland would like to make one point clear: The door swings both ways.Unfortunate choice of words considering that it's probably the gay priests that they'll get and they have a gay bishop.
14 posted on
10/30/2009 9:46:20 AM PDT by
tricky_k_1972
(Putting on Tinfoil hat and heading for the bomb shelter.)
To: Gamecock
The Episcopal Bishop "opens the door"??
Oh yeah, I mean it's so difficult to join the Episcopal Church, isn't it? I mean entry requirements are so stringent!! It's not as if any Tom, Dick or Harry who believes any old nonsense can be admitted is it?
Can you say "stunt"?
15 posted on
10/30/2009 9:55:27 AM PDT by
marshmallow
("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
To: Gamecock
As vast as the differences between the most conservative Catholics and the most liberal Episcopalians, the services have a similarity which makes movement comfortable for those unhappy with their church. Many Protestant services would seem foreign to someone raised a Catholic. My grandfather was a very conservative Episcopalian minister, who got booted in the early sixties from Washington DC to the far hinterland because the Episcopal Church had started it's liberal swing way back then. His character and sense of loyalty would never of allowed him to switch churches. He definitely would not of been comfortable with the Episcopal Church today. He would, as he always did, minister faithfully to those the Lord put in his care. As to myself, I believe that some relationship with the divine is better then none, regardless of politics.
To: Gamecock
If I ever need my female bishop to introduce me to other hot guys, I will be sure to call....
17 posted on
10/30/2009 10:02:21 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Gamecock
I’m trying to decide between hysterical or pathetic.
19 posted on
10/30/2009 10:05:32 AM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin: pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
To: Gamecock
LOL! I wonder which offer will have the most takers? I hope the queers, pedophiles, womynpriests and wreckovators all take him up on it and good riddance.
20 posted on
10/30/2009 10:11:17 AM PDT by
redhead
(They are running SCARED, folks! :o) Check out the Halfbaked Sourdough at mukluk.wordpress.com)
To: Gamecock; IbJensen
Big difference in being invited into the billion+ member Catholic Church and being invited by a lone bishop into his 45,000 member ECUSA (Episcopal Club USA)
21 posted on
10/30/2009 10:13:39 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
To: Gamecock
Fine. It’s a free country. Just don’t tell me the Episcopal Church is ecumenical and the mean ol’ nasty Catholic Church isn’t.
To: Gamecock
Many think that Catholics are not really Christians.
Reading some of the above comments makes one suspect that they may be right. The truth, however, is that these extremely uncharitable and lacking in all common decency bloggers are the true CHinos - Christians in name only - who think they are the perfect Catholics but lack every good quality that the the Catholic nuns and priests of Vatican II tried to teach them. Some call them “JPII Catholics” and some are even proud to be called such. God Help Us!
25 posted on
10/30/2009 12:51:31 PM PDT by
VidMihi
("In fide, unitas; in dubiis, libertas; in omnibus, caritas.")
To: Gamecock; a fool in paradise
I might consider. How are the babes at the E-Church?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson