Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican's synod outline takes aim at rules on reception of Communion
Catholic News Service ^ | 5/10/04 | John Thavis

Posted on 05/10/2004 6:17:28 PM PDT by kjvail

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The recent debate over liturgical abuses and reception of Communion by dissenting Catholics is about to be taken to a global level as the church prepares for the 2005 Synod of Bishops.

The synod's topic is the Eucharist. In recent days, bishops around the world have received a Vatican-prepared thematic outline that focuses in large part on the rules that govern celebration of the Eucharist -- including who should and who should not receive Communion.

(Excerpt) Read more at catholicnews.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: abortion; catholiclist; communion; politicans
With all the recent controversey perhaps Rome will be forced to make some hard decisions?
1 posted on 05/10/2004 6:17:30 PM PDT by kjvail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kjvail; american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp IV; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; ...
FULL TEXT

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The recent debate over liturgical abuses and reception of Communion by dissenting Catholics is about to be taken to a global level as the church prepares for the 2005 Synod of Bishops.

The synod's topic is the Eucharist. In recent days, bishops around the world have received a Vatican-prepared thematic outline that focuses in large part on the rules that govern celebration of the Eucharist -- including who should and who should not receive Communion.

The 75-page outline, called the "lineamenta," has not been released publicly by the Vatican. Catholic News Service obtained a copy of the document in early May.

The outline emphasizes the sacramental and liturgical norms against shared Communion with most non-Catholics. It repeatedly makes the point that the church does not have the power to give Communion to Catholics living in grave sin, to those "teaching error" or to "persons living an immoral life."

Although the Eucharist is a sacrament of unity, it presupposes "unity in the faith" for those who would share in its reception, the document said. In that sense, people should not receive Communion in a "casual, routine manner," it said.

"Communion can be received only in union with the whole church, after overcoming any separation because of religion or morality," it said.

The outline did not explicitly address the question of denying Communion to those in opposition to key church teachings. Instead, it framed the question in terms borrowed from the early Christian writings of the Didache: "If one is holy, come; if one is not, repent."

The document warned of the potential abuses of "liturgical creativity." It reviewed the church's rules on such matters as the breaking of the eucharistic bread, the sacred vessels used in Mass, the need for "dignified" music, and placement of the tabernacle, altar and even the celebrant's chair.

One of the biggest concerns voiced by the outline is that many Catholics may see the Eucharist as simply a "fraternal meal" instead of the sacrament of Christ's continuing presence. This would be a "grave error," it said.

"There are indications in eucharistic catechesis and practice of an overemphasis on a single aspect, e.g., on the Eucharist as meal, on the baptismal common priesthood, on the sufficiency of a Liturgy of the Word only and on ecumenical practices at Mass which are contrary to the faith and discipline of the church," it said.

In a section of questions designed to provoke reflection and a written response by bishops, the document again focused on abuses. It asked:

-- What are the negative aspects in eucharistic worship, and what is the cause of such a "disorienting situation" for the faithful?

-- "In an attempt to be personal and avant-garde, do priests manifest any attitudes in their celebration of the Mass which are explicitly or implicitly contrary to the liturgical norms?"

-- Do the faithful display a casual approach to receiving Communion?

-- Do Catholics adequately understand the difference between the Mass and other liturgies presided over by lay people? Do they distinguish enough between ordained and nonordained ministers?

-- Do some elements in eucharistic liturgies lead to "a diminished regard for the real presence" of Christ in the Eucharist?

-- How are the norms of inter-Communion applied?

-- How is confusion avoided regarding the mystery of the Blessed Sacrament in ecumenical and interreligious meetings?

-- What steps are taken in inculturation to prevent "peculiar and strange practices" in liturgy?

Some at the Vatican see the upcoming synod as the third step in a process of restoring liturgical order to eucharistic celebrations. The first step was Pope John Paul II's encyclical on the Eucharist in 2003. The second was the document on liturgical abuses, released by the Vatican in late April.

Some observers thought it was unusual for an encyclical to precede a Synod of Bishops on the same topic. But Vatican sources said the synod is expected to give wider resonance to the earlier encyclical and the document on abuses.

"The bishops will represent the episcopacy of the world, and it's important that they be heard as speaking with a single voice on these issues," said one source. He said the synod could be expected to do this in language that is generally positive and pastoral.

The formal theme of the synod is "The Eucharist: Source and Culmination of the Life and Mission of the Church." The outline included lengthy sections explaining the theology of the Eucharist, drawing heavily from the pope's recent encyclical as well as early church writers.

The Eucharist must be understood as "spiritual nourishment" that strengthens the mission of every member of the church, it said. It is "the spiritual food of the soul, the antidote for sin, the beginning of future glory and the fountain of holiness," it said.

The document said liturgy and catechesis should help Catholics better understand the mystery of the Eucharist -- which is a problem in an age marked by a "denial of mystery," it said.

The outline asked bishops to supply statistics on daily and weekly Mass attendance and to list ways in which the church's teaching on the Eucharist is being deepened in their dioceses. In effect, it said, the bishops are being asked to take "pastoral inventory" on all things related to the Eucharist.

The Vatican asked the bishops to return their response before the end of the year. The responses will provide the basis for a working document for the synod, scheduled for Oct. 2-29, 2005.

2 posted on 05/10/2004 6:36:05 PM PDT by NYer (O Promise of God from age to age. O Flower of the Gospel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjvail
From the article:

***"The outline asked bishops to supply statistics on daily and weekly Mass attendance and to list ways in which the church's teaching on the Eucharist is being deepened in their dioceses. In effect, it said, the bishops are being asked to take "pastoral inventory" on all things related to the Eucharist."***

Stats should also be made of the amount of people receiving and the amount of those going to confession. I would suggest a ratio of 50:1

The Church is made up of sinners, not Saints
3 posted on 05/10/2004 6:37:17 PM PDT by franky (Pray for the souls of the faithful departed. Pray for our own souls to receive the grace of a happy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: franky
The Church is made up of sinners, not Saints


Ok that's a given... the question is UNREPENTENT sinners recieving the Blessed Sacrament and how to handle it. In short how to deal with aposty.
4 posted on 05/10/2004 6:48:16 PM PDT by kjvail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kjvail
Thank you for posting this news story! Looking at it from the US perspective only, it is possible to see where the lines will be drawn - the conservative vs liberal bishops and how the liturgy is celebrated in their respective dioceses.

After witnessing so many of these norms either abandoned or abused in my local diocese, I have switched Rites. For years, attending Sunday mass was a painful process - consecrated hosts distributed in glass salad bowls, EEMs dropping the host on the carpet then picking them up and dropping them back into the salad bowl - the litany could drone on. Poor catechesis of CCD students, no crucifix, the use of liturgical dance ... it was a challenge to find a church that still had kneelers. Each Sunday, I would leave mass filled with angst, frustration, bitterness and anger.

That is all behind me now. In a world where nothing is perfect, not even my new parish, I have discovered a beautifuly, rich liturgy, a parish community where parents and children dress up, where communion is distributed ONLY by the priest and ONLY on the tongue, where people pull together to help each other out. There are 3 downlights in this tiny little church - all focused on the 3 most important elements of our faith - the Tabernacle, the Crucifix and the Book of the Gospels. More importantly, there is a peace that permeates the little church, and that accompanies us home each week. It has lightened my load, lifted my soul and carries me through from one week to the next.

5 posted on 05/10/2004 6:54:32 PM PDT by NYer (O Promise of God from age to age. O Flower of the Gospel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: NYer
We have Friars at our Church. They move around alot, most only stay for a few years then a new priest comes in. I remember the last one would have a thick doughy substance for communion at the Easter Mass.

He would let the (I believe the correct word is neophytes) make the bread and it included honey and other things. This happened a couple years in a row. Really disturbed my wife and I. (and others) So we brought it up to the priest.

He agreed to stop but he got transfered not long after. The priest we have now is alot better and he's making changes.

7 posted on 05/11/2004 4:11:19 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Glad to hear of your experience finally finding a "real" Catholic church. I have no problem with many of the "new" things, but the key phrase in this article to me was the title of the Synod: "The Eucharist: Source and Culmination of the Life and Mission of the Church." This is the Divine Mysterym the ultimate prayer. It's not a symbol, a community meal, or a practice, it is (even though science and logic may not be able to explain it) "the body and blood, soul and divinity of Christ" made present at the moment of Consecration.

TRANSUBSTANTIATION: is it even taught any more in religion class? GENUFLECTION: do people know why they are doing it? Some believe it's to kneel before the crucifix. Wrong, we do not worship statues in the Catholic religion. It is to kneel before the PRESENCE of Christ in the Blessed Sacrament.

If I could make just one change in every church, it would be to move the Tabernacle back to where it belongs, the very center, prominently and respectfully displayed, with the sanctuary lamp clearly visible.

My Uncle, who is a little bit connected with goings on in the church feels this is a positive trend the Pope began almost accidentally years ago when he requested the tabernacle in his private chapel be moved back to the center, which caused some flurry in inner circles. Now it is a deliberate attempt by him to re-focus these liberal post Vatican II psuedo-protestants back to the real STRENGTH of the church...Jesus Christ, present in the Word AND the SACRAMENTS.
8 posted on 05/11/2004 4:12:59 AM PDT by enuu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sartorius
To your question: it is NOT a coincidence that Bishops in this country are slowly but surely making clear the position regarding (e.g., Kerry) politicians and Communion.

And Rome finally found a way around the Liturgy-abuse problem, which is to remind Bishops and priests that the Eucharist is a VERY big deal.

It's "sacred time, sacred space, sacred action, sacred language" starting from the Eucharist.
9 posted on 05/11/2004 5:04:33 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
And Rome finally found a way around the Liturgy-abuse problem, which is to remind Bishops and priests that the Eucharist is a VERY big deal.

The question is, are they and the modernists who seem to think they run things going to pay attention and do as told or ignore it?
10 posted on 05/11/2004 5:18:41 AM PDT by Desdemona (Evil attacks good. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: enuu
My Uncle, who is a little bit connected with goings on in the church feels this is a positive trend the Pope began almost accidentally years ago when he requested the tabernacle in his private chapel be moved back to the center, which caused some flurry in inner circles.


John Paul II prepares for daily mass in his private chapel at the Vatican.

John Paul II has always made the celebration of the Mass the central event of each of his pastoral visits to 120 Italian dioceses and 74 foreign countries. He insists on the Mass as the most important experience for all believers.

When and where does the Holy Father celebrate Mass?

MONSIGNOR TRAN NGOC THU: The Holy Father rises every day at 5:30 AM, one hour earlier than his secretaries. He goes to his private chapel to prepare himself in prayer for the day's activities. One half hour before Mass, he gives directions to the sisters of the Papal Household. He thinks of everything - flowers for the altar, special remembrances. The papal secretaries arrange the daily Mass-book. When others arrive, they find the Holy Father already kneeling in prayer.

How does the Pope pray?

TRAN NGOC THU: To be present while the Holy Father is praying and saying daily Mass is a unique experience. He prays passionately, his eyes closed, with frequent invocations, such as: "Oh, my Lord! Oh, my God!" He often passes his hand over his forehead. His devotion is truly impassioned. The Pope takes seriously all those who write to him requesting special intentions. It is the responsibility of the papal secretaries and one other sister to examine, list and organize the petitions. We place photocopies of these before the Pope as he kneels at daily Mass, and he includes them in his prayers. The intentions may be for the gravely ill, or for those who have had accidents or other troubles. One day we received a letter from an American mother whose 17-year old son was in coma after a diving accident. The Pope also remembers the local churches and the bishops. He prays for the living and for the dead. He prays intently, stopping after every remembrance, eyes tightly closed, immersed in contemplation. Sometimes when he opens his eyes, his prayer has been so profound, that he no longer recalls at what point the liturgy has arrived. His abandonment to prayer is total, a kind of ecstasy.

JOHN PAUL II'S SECRET

11 posted on 05/11/2004 6:15:25 AM PDT by NYer (O Promise of God from age to age. O Flower of the Gospel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
I think their day is essentially over--like the day of the wacko-leftist Democrats. I suspect that they are preparing for the final battle--but in a curious co-incidence, the Kerry thing crystallizes the whole nexus.

The US is within 5 years of being in a formally-recognized 'awakening,' which has occurred before--and for the better every time.
12 posted on 05/11/2004 7:11:35 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Thanks for posting the full article -- kudos to you!
13 posted on 05/11/2004 7:39:34 AM PDT by ConservativeStLouisGuy (11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kjvail
"The recent debate over liturgical abuses and reception of Communion by dissenting Catholics is about to be taken to a global level"

I wonder just who is being referred to as "dissenting".

14 posted on 05/11/2004 7:45:01 AM PDT by Arguss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: ninenot
I think their day is essentially over

What makes you think so? Just out of curiousity.
16 posted on 05/11/2004 3:36:02 PM PDT by Desdemona (Evil attacks good. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: sartorius
I do believe he will be named "John Paul the Great" one day. Just my humble opinion...

And I agree with you 1000%! It is well understood that he has mystical experiences. Thank you so much for corroborating what the Vietnamese priest stated in his interview. And, in case you missed it, the following Peggy Noonan column bears repeating ... and repeating .... and repeating! It is one of her best! (and my personal favorite)

* * * * *

PEGGY NOONANJohn Paul the Great
What the 12 million know--and I found out too.

Friday, August 2, 2002 12:01 a.m.

The pope's trip to the Americas has ended in Mexico with the canonization of the fabled Juan Diego of Guadalupe, the 464th saint recognized by the church since John Paul's papacy began. The pontiff has now recognized more saints than all his predecessors combined. His readiness to canonize is in service of an eagerness to evangelize. This is John Paul's desire: To raise up from as many nationalities, ethnic groups and indigenous peoples as possible a saint who is of them, from them and yet an exemplar of the universal church.

Keep the base and build the base.

Twelve million people lined the streets of Mexico City to greet John Paul the day he arrived--12 million! The church may have suffered in the field this year, but the troops apparently remain.

What did his trip accomplish? Something big. He proved that no matter how healthy or capable-seeming the pope is or is not, he is here, he is loved, he has power, he is a presence. The trip was a reply to those within and without the church who have called for the pope's resignation or retirement. John Paul said, through his actions, God decides when a pope "resigns"; God will take the pope from the earth, and as long as God keeps the pope here, the pope will fill the shoes of the Fisherman and do the work of the Lord.

I don't think we'll be hearing any more calls for the pontiff's departure any time soon.

By presenting the fact of his presence, the pope demonstrated not his personal power but the enduring power of the papacy itself, and of the church, too, come hell or high water, come scandal or shame.

On the streets of Mexico City they sobbed as he went by. Did you see it on the news? The pope was in the glass-enclosed popemobile, and as he passed, the people who jammed the streets and sidewalks reached out to him with their hands and burst into tears and sobs.

The pope they were reaching for, of course, was not the sturdy, charismatic man in white who had wowed the crowds on his first trip to Mexico as pope, 23 years ago.

This man is old, a caged lion bent and spent.

And still they sobbed and reached for him.

Why?

"The force of his presence was like a blow to the heart." That's how the actor Richard Burton described meeting Winston Churchill. I thought of that after I met the pope.

It was late June 2000, and I was visiting Rome to speak to a business group. When I was invited to speak I called a friend of a friend in the New York Archdiocese and asked if I could get a ticket to an audience with the pope. She took down the number I'd be staying at and told me to stand by.

I was to be in Rome for five days, and each day I hoped a call would come. The day before I left, the phone rang in my room, and a young woman with perfectly enunciated English told me that the next morning I would see the pope. "Go to the big bronze doors of the Vatican," she said, "and wait."

That's what I wrote in my notes. No address, just big bronze doors, Vatican.

The next morning at sunrise I hailed a taxi and said in English: "The big bronze doors of the Vatican," and the driver said "OK!" as if he'd been told that destination before. We drove through silent streets. I was excited. You're supposed to get less enthusiastic about people as you get older, or at least less moved by them, and be less impressed by them, but that hasn't happened to me. And the pope was the person I most admired in the world--John Paul the Great. Writer, poet, evangelist, lover of children, comforter of the pained, inspirer of the caged and controlled, resister of fascism, defeater of communism, definer and denouncer of materialism, great foe of the culture of death. A great man of the ages, a man for all seasons and times.

We got to the big bronze doors, and I stood in front of them in the thin morning sun. I knocked. The sound of my knocking seemed tinny, almost comic against the weight of the doors. No one answered.

Soon a young man came by--early 20s, tight black jeans, tight black T-shirt, pierced earrings up and down his ears, pierced earring in his eyebrow, black spiky hair, sideburns shaved to points on the curve of his jaw. We waited silently, looked at each other and looked away. Finally I looked at my watch. "Guess they're not open yet," I said.

He nodded and said, "I'm early."

"Do you have an appointment here?"

"Yes," he said. "I'm going to see the pope."

He was from Canada, he said. He writes rock music and is an aspiring musician. He was in Rome for work and asked his bishop back home if he could see the pope.

I told him I had done the same.

Little by little they came, our motley crew. A hearty, high-colored middle-aged man with an Australian accent, in a sober black suit, his wife and teenage children. They looked like the richest Catholics in Sydney. Then a Polish family in full native costume--dirndles, braided hair, pleated white dresses and blue cotton bows. Soon there were more than a dozen of us.

Suddenly, silently the great bronze doors opened, and we were gestured in by a man in a janitor's clothes. He hustled us up the stairs, past Swiss Guards in their black-and-red uniforms. Up a series of marble stairs, to the right and up some more, then a landing from which one looked down great marble halls. Then up another floor until we were ushered into a huge and stately room of white-gray marble.

Here waiting were more people. There were about 30 of us in all now, and we lined the room standing against the walls. The room filled with excited chatter. I had stuck with my heavy-metal Canadian, and the Australians had stuck with us.

My Canadian looked at me and said, with some urgency, "What do we do when we meet him? How do you meet the pope?"

It hadn't occurred to me to think about this. I shrugged and said, like a happy American idiot, "I think you shake his hand."

"You do?" he said. "I thought you, like, kiss it, or bow."

"I don't know," I said, and turned to the Australian burgher to ask him when suddenly there was silence. Like a blanket of silence had fallen on us. And we all looked in the same direction and suddenly two great doors were opening soundlessly, and then there was a rustling noise, and we stood straight up.

And he entered. John Paul the Great. Massive and frail, full and bent--a man like frail marble. He was dressed in white robes, a white beanie on his white hair. He walked slowly, a cane in his right hand, his head tilting forward. The face expressionless--the Parkinsonian mask.

He stepped into the room and the room burst into applause.

And suddenly there was singing. It was a group of dark-haired young nuns dressed in blue. They almost levitated at the sight of him and they had burst into song. He stopped in front of them and his head went back and his chest filled. Then he took his cane and shook it at them merrily and said in a baritone that filled the room, "Philippines!"

Feel-ah-PEENZ.

And the nuns exploded with applause because they were indeed from the Philippines and he had known. They one after another knelt on the floor as he walked past.

Now he looked at another little group and he shook his cane comically as he passed them and said, "Brah-SILL!"

And the Brazilians cheered and started to cry.

And the pope moveed on, shuffling now, and he walked by an extraordinary looking young man--coal black hair, thick and cut so that it was standing straight up. It looked like Pentecost hair. He was slim, Asian, in the dress of a seminarian. He had been watching things dreamily, happily, his hands in the attitude of prayer, and then the pope stopped, turned and held his cane toward him.

"China!" he said.

And the young man slid to his knees, bent toward the floor and moved to kiss the pope's shoe.

And the pope caught him in an embrace as if to say No, I am not your hero, you are my hero.

And from nowhere came to me the electric charge of an intuition. I felt with certainty that I had just witnessed a future saint embrace a future cardinal of Beijing.

And my eyes filled with tears.

The pope proceeded down the line, nodding and patting, and when he got to me I jerked into a kind of curtsy-bow and touched his right hand with my hands. Then I bent and covered his thick old knuckles with Chanel No. 23 Red Raspberry lipstick.

I couldn't help it. I think I said, "Papa." He nodded. He was probably thinking, "Oh Lord, another lipstick leaver." And then he pressed into my hand a soft brown plastic envelope bearing an imprint of the papal seal. When I opened it later I saw light and inexpensive rosary beads, the crucifix of which carried an aluminum Christ on the cross, his broken body ungainly and without grace. It is this depiction of Christ that the pope carries at the top of his crozier, the long silver staff he uses when he walks into the world.

I still have the picture of our meeting. I never saw anyone take it and was surprised to receive it in the mail. I look gooney. Like a happy gooney woman transported by bliss.

The last person in line was the Canadian rocker. When the pope came to him, he bowed and kissed John Paul's hand. "I have written music for you," he said. He showed the pope a sheet of music, beautifully done by hand and laminated. It had a title like "A Song for John Paul II."

The pope looked at it and said, "You wrote?"

And the rocker, rocking, said, "Yes, for you."

The pope took it, walked 10 feet away to where there was a big brown table, and signed it in a big flourish--Johannes Paulus II. And came and handed it back.

And then he walked on, and out of the room.

There was silence again until it was broken softly by my rocker. "This is the greatest day of my life," he said to me. And my eyes filled with tears again because I knew it was true and because it is a privilege to be there on the best day of another human being's life.

We were ushered out and I went into the streets of Rome and in time hailed a cab and told the cab driver all about it. I was so excited I left my eyeglasses on the seat. But I still had the rosary beads, and they're here with me right now, right in front of me on my desk.

So when I saw those sobbing, reaching Mexicans I knew what they knew. When you see the pope something happens. You expect to be moved but it's bigger than that and more surprising. It feels like a gaiety brought by goodness. It feels like a bubbling up. I think some people feel humbled by some unseen gravity and others lifted by some unknown lightness.

It's like some great white dove flutters from your chest, emerges and flies upward. And you didn't even know it was there. And all this leaves you reaching outward, toward one who is broken, ungainly, without grace. And it fills you with tears. Or so it seems to me. At least that was my experience.

Ms. Noonan is a contributing editor of The Wall Street Journal. Her most recent book, "When Character Was King: A Story of Ronald Reagan," is published by Viking Penguin. You can buy it from the OpinionJournal bookstore. Her column appears Fridays.

18 posted on 05/11/2004 5:04:00 PM PDT by NYer (O Promise of God from age to age. O Flower of the Gospel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Saw a few of them the other night. Now they look 'hunted' rather than as though they were the ruling class. Of course, that's just here in Milwaukee.

But it's the same in Chicago, Boston, Phoenix, Denver, Rockford, and in other places.

Finally, this Kerry thing is beginning to sink in. The Bishops, while not exactly presenting a unified front, nor acting with courage in all cases, are letting it be known that 'there are some things up with which we will not put.'

And I think the laity is ready for that--and willing.

It's not more than flotsam/jetsam at this point...sorry.
19 posted on 05/11/2004 5:35:42 PM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson