Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Schwarzenegger Gaining; Recall Strong as October 7 Election Nears
Business Wire ^ | October 05, 2003 09:00 AM US Eastern

Posted on 10/05/2003 6:25:30 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

STANFORD, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 5, 2003--The final of three recent Stanford University-Hoover Institution polls shows GOP candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger has consolidated his support among voters and support is solid for the Oct. 7 recall to replace Governor Gray Davis.

These findings are consistent with the previous online surveys conducted by the Stanford-Hoover group and Knowledge Networks since Sept. 8.

The Stanford-Hoover poll was the first to identify Schwarzenegger as the front-running candidate.

The latest findings are based on interviews conducted between Sept. 26 and Oct. 4 with likely voters in California. The survey was done by Knowledge Networks (http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp) in collaboration with the Stanford-Hoover group.

The poll showed continued support for the recall with approximately 59 percent still in favor of the recall and support for Schwarzenegger increasingly slightly to 43 percent.

Stanford communications professor Shanto Iyengar and political science professors David Brady and Morris Fiorina created the poll to learn more about the logic behind voters' decision-making leading up to the special election. Brady and Fiorina are also senior fellows at the Hoover Institution.

The results are compared to results from two earlier surveys using the same questions that were conducted by Knowledge Networks and Stanford University between Aug. 29 and Sept. 8 and between Sept. 11 and Sept. 21. The Sept. 8 Stanford University and Knowledge Networks poll was the first to identify Schwarzenegger as the front-runner and strong majority support for the recall initiative.

Recent revelations about Schwarzenegger's sexual indiscretions do not appear to have hurt his candidacy. The latest survey shows that female voters are not swinging to the Bustamante campaign. The two candidates have a similar level of support among female voters (38 percent for Schwarzenegger and 34 percent for Bustamante). Interviews collected since the Oct. 2 revelations do not show a decrease in support for the GOP candidate.

"Even though we only have a limited number of recent interviews," Shanto Iyengar noted, "we're not seeing any signs of greater support for 'no' on recall or weakened enthusiasm for Arnold Schwarzenegger in the aftermath of the Los Angeles Times story detailing the sexual harassment allegations."

"All three waves of our survey have shown consistent majority support for the recall and plurality support for Schwarzenegger," Morris Fiorina said. "Our survey methodology (presenting respondents with a facsimile of the actual ballot) forces the undecideds to choose and it appears that all along the undecideds have been disproportionately supportive of the recall and Arnold Schwarzenegger."

Californians who participated in the online surveys voted 40 percent for Schwarzenegger during two polls held between Aug. 29 and Sept. 8, and between Sept. 11 and Sept. 21. In the most recent poll, Schwarzenegger was favored by 43 percent of the respondents. His support increased among Republicans from 62 to 72 percent, while maintaining support from 20 percent of Democrats and 39 percent of Independents.

Support for Bustamante's candidacy increased from 28 to 32 percent between the dates of the first two surveys, and is currently at 30 percent. Support for Bustamante among registered Hispanic voters has not maintained an upward trajectory as suggested in the first two polls, when support for the candidate jumped from 40 to 63 percent during the two-week interval. In the most recent poll, Bustamante's support dropped to 49 percent among Hispanics while Schwarzenegger has 32 percent of the Hispanic vote.

GOP candidate Tom McClintock was selected by 13 percent of the respondents. All remaining candidates collected 14 percent of the online votes.

The survey team concluded that undecided voters gravitate to the most visible candidate -- the candidate with name recognition. Since the online survey, which was conducted to project to the entire California voting population, presented all 135 candidates to respondents, those candidates with greater name recognition are more likely to stand out on the crowded ballot.

Unlike conventional polls, which restrict respondents' choices to the top candidates and give them the option of selecting "undecideds" a response, the online surveys gave participants the actual ballot that included the question about recalling Davis and listed the 135 replacement candidates. Fiorina said this scenario is closer to the actual situation voters will face.

Meanwhile, the three polls showed little change in voter support for the recall itself. Among registered voters, 62 percent indicated "yes" for the recall and 38 percent said "no" in the first survey. In the second poll, 61 percent of participants voted "yes" and 39 percent voted "no." In the most recent poll, 59 percent favor the recall initiative. Republicans overwhelmingly favor the recall (94 percent). Democrats increasingly oppose the recall effort, with 58 percent opposing the recall in the first poll and 68 percent in the most recent poll.

Survey Methodology

Knowledge Networks, a Menlo Park-based research firm, surveyed a representative sample of 956 registered voters in California, 702 of whom were determined to be likely voters. According to Mike Dennis, the polls were conducted with a random sample of adults in California who are members of a national "web-enabled panel" created and maintained by Knowledge Networks that is designed to be representative of the U.S. population. Knowledge Networks maintains the only Internet-based research panel projectable to the full U.S. population.

Initially, participants were chosen scientifically by a random selection of household telephone numbers. Individuals in selected households were then asked by telephone to participate in the research panel.

Those who agreed to participate were sent an Internet appliance and received an Internet service connection provided by Knowledge Networks.

Some people who already had computers and Internet service were also permitted to participate using their own equipment, Dennis said. Panelists received unique log-in information for accessing surveys online, and then were sent e-mails three to four times a month inviting them to participate in research. For the recall surveys, Knowledge Networks randomly selected adult panelists in California.

For more detailed results and information on the methodology, view the appendix at: http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; poll; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Related Thread:

Poll: Support for recall is waning in CA
Jim Puzzanghera and Linda Goldston ^ | Sat, Oct. 04, 2003 | By Jim Puzzanghera and Linda Goldston
 

Posted on 10/05/2003 7:51 AM CDT by KQQL

1 posted on 10/05/2003 6:25:30 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
DON'T MEAN TO BUG YOU.....
BUT CAN YOU HELP?
PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to


FreeRepublic
LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO
CA 93794
Or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY A BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD
It's on the Breaking News Sidebar

2 posted on 10/05/2003 6:26:42 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Democrats increasingly oppose the recall effort, with 58 percent opposing the recall in the first poll and 68 percent in the most recent poll.

I guess this means Bustamante's supporters realize he can't win.

3 posted on 10/05/2003 6:31:27 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
RAT ATTACK IS AT FULL THROTTLE!


Davis says Arnie should be prosecuted.!

PLUS

NATIONAL ENQUIRER PREPARING TO SPLASH ARNOLD 'LOVE CHILD' ALLEGATIONS


4 posted on 10/05/2003 6:36:34 AM PDT by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
From the 10/5/03 Boston Globe:

"Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Demcrat of California who was once a rival of Davis's, addressed the accusations as she joined Davis on the stump. 'These 11 women have said things, frankly, that I couldn't believe anyone in public life would do . . . those things that really denigrate and deprecate a woman,' she said. 'It should cause us all to think, do we really want this man as governor of our state?'"

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2003/10/05/battle_intensifies_as_calif_vote_nears/

What, was she asleep during the Clinton years?
5 posted on 10/05/2003 6:42:25 AM PDT by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Recall Strong as October 7 Election Nears
Support for recall is waning in CA

Waxing? Waning? I'm sooooo confused! Hanging Chads, Pregnant Chads, Dimpled Chads. I'm sooooo confused!

Wow, I could be a voter in Florida or California.

Praying Tues will come quickly. It's gonna be a long, long year until Nov 2004. [Battening down the hatches]
6 posted on 10/05/2003 6:43:35 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Recent revelations about Schwarzenegger's sexual indiscretions do not appear to have hurt his candidacy.

I think the writer is taking unwarranted and inflammatory license here.

I'm not aware of any such "revelations."

There have been allegations, not "revelations," of crude, boorish behavior, not "sexual indiscretions."

"Sexual indiscretion" is a euphemism for sex of some sort, not for groping, which is what has been alleged.


7 posted on 10/05/2003 6:49:42 AM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Several words in the important 5th paragraph do not ring true to me. The word *continued* is not really correct. The last poll I remember was 56% for recall, now it is 59%?? Also, the phrase *increased slightly* does not ring true. An increase from 40% to 43% is much more than slightly. (I don't vote there, but I am still for Tom.)
8 posted on 10/05/2003 6:50:45 AM PDT by YepYep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
CNN is getting desperate. Last evening they still spread the "I like Hitler" lie. And showed Davis with the Rev. Jesse Jackson (or a look-alike) standing right behind him.
9 posted on 10/05/2003 6:51:25 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YepYep
GOP candidate Tom McClintock was selected by 13 percent of the respondents.

Does this ring true for you?

10 posted on 10/05/2003 7:30:42 AM PDT by mac_truck (Ora et Labora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: YepYep
An increase from 40% to 43% is much more than slightly.

It cannot be demonstrated that, in two separate polls using the exact same methods, 40% is any different from 43%. The difference is within the margin of error. Statistically, it is a wash.

11 posted on 10/05/2003 7:46:47 AM PDT by outlawcam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
Does this ring true for you?

See above.

12 posted on 10/05/2003 7:47:35 AM PDT by outlawcam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
I am kind of leery about this. If Arnold has a big lead in the polls, many McClintock voters will probably stay with McC. Whereas if it were close, they'd come "home" to Arnold. I'm hoping these polls are accurate. Otherwise, we could be in for a surprise as few McC voters switch to Arnold, and Cruz cruises in with 40%.
13 posted on 10/05/2003 7:49:07 AM PDT by Koblenz (There's usually a free market solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Once again, incisive analysis by the Big Cat with the Sharp Teeth. [this is a true compliment, and not sarcastic].
14 posted on 10/05/2003 8:00:48 AM PDT by fqued (Arnold, in spite of a "vote for Tom McClintock being a vote for Pia Zadora.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
Yep. Your observations are very astute.
15 posted on 10/05/2003 8:02:43 AM PDT by alwaysconservative (Strong Republican women can do ANYTHING they want to!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
GOP candidate Tom McClintock was selected by 13 percent of the respondents.

Does this ring true for you?


Within the ballpark: Tom will end up with between 12% and 18% of the vote. No recent poll has shown him above 18%, and they average less than that.
16 posted on 10/05/2003 8:02:53 AM PDT by fqued (Arnold, in spite of a "vote for Tom McClintock being a vote for Pia Zadora.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fqued; mac_truck
The 11th hour attacks on Schwarzenegger had a couple of effects. It likely peeled away some votes from Schwarzenegger, but also quite likely galavanized some of his "soft" support who became indignant about his treatment in the press. These people are not only voting for Schwarzenegger, but they are also voting against Davis, the LA Slimes, the Clinton News Network, and many of the other leftist forces arrayed against the recall.

McClintock had relied on regaining some of Schwarzenegger's soft Conservative support (i.e. those voters who thought Tom was a better candidate but were going to vote for Arnold because he had a better chance of winning). With the Bustamante campaign imploding, it is ironic that the chances of the McClintock campaign were hurt by the Schwarenegger revelations.

17 posted on 10/05/2003 8:19:18 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio
McClintock had relied on regaining some of Schwarzenegger's soft Conservative support (i.e. those voters who thought Tom was a better candidate but were going to vote for Arnold because he had a better chance of winning). With the Bustamante campaign imploding, it is ironic that the chances of the McClintock campaign were hurt by the Schwarenegger revelations

MOST IRONIC, given that the Liberals were trying to boost McClintock's numbers to harm Arnold.
18 posted on 10/05/2003 8:21:53 AM PDT by fqued (Arnold, in spite of a "vote for Tom McClintock being a vote for Pia Zadora.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

19 posted on 10/05/2003 8:24:30 AM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
IMHO the Stanford surveys are the most accurate because they do what the election itself will do, present the potential voters with the actual ballot they will face on Tuesday. Therefore, these are more accurate projections (and they are in line with my predictions).

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "Two Degrees of Separation and a Double Sawbuck," discussion thread on FR. IF YOU WANT A FREEPER IN CONGRESS, CLICK HERE.

20 posted on 10/05/2003 8:33:01 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson