Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials confirm dropping firebombs on Iraqi troops - Results 'remarkably similar' to using napalm
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | August 5, 2003 | James W. Crawley

Posted on 08/05/2003 11:19:18 AM PDT by HAL9000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: FairOpinion
We threw down thousands of flyers, telling the Iraqis to surrender or die, well, those that didn't surrender, died.

Please continue to remind us... lest some of the media forget :-) That includes John Pike.

41 posted on 08/05/2003 11:41:55 AM PDT by Gracey (what's a tag line?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
yeah? and i'm supposed to feel...what? ashamed? ha! I'd rather see our military use whatever weapons are effective than to risk unnecessary deaths on our side. I don't think the terrorists had too much compunction about using civilian airplanes to kill thousands of people. Poo poo, more liberal chest-beating on how bad the US is and how ethical every other country is. baaah
42 posted on 08/05/2003 11:43:12 AM PDT by MightyMouseToSaveThe Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G L Tirebiter
Or, white phosporous...now there was a scary mortar round.
43 posted on 08/05/2003 11:43:12 AM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
In numerous after action reports from Vietnam, incendiary rounds, especially white phosphorous, were much more effective in reducing enemy activity than high explosive. American tankers in Normandy used WP very effectively against German soldiers.
44 posted on 08/05/2003 11:43:30 AM PDT by CholeraJoe ("Sir, all of our Viking Kitties, living and dead are off the battlefield." Admin Mod: "Well done!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
now you've got ME rolling! hahahah...i love the witty FReepers here.
45 posted on 08/05/2003 11:46:06 AM PDT by MightyMouseToSaveThe Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Yeah, and the Islamist hijack three plane load of US civilians, slit the throats of the stewardess, crash it into two office buildings creating a napalm like firestorm. The people in the upper floors were cooked to death. Walking on the floors was like walking on a barbacue grill. Shoes and nylon stocking melted onto peoples feet and they still had hours to go before they would die. They were in such agony that many choose to leap to their deaths than endure the heat. Where are the Human Rights bastards then??? As far as I am concern, cluster bomb em and napalm them!!! The only regret is they still die too fast.
46 posted on 08/05/2003 11:47:02 AM PDT by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Incendiaries create burns that are difficult to treat,"

That's good because we want to kill the enemy in war.

47 posted on 08/05/2003 11:48:25 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Napalm which is anti personnel oriented has sticky stuff so it is a lot nastier than an incendary which is used to ignite things like buildings and burn through engine blocks. Used to be that incendaries were magnesium and aluminum based.
48 posted on 08/05/2003 11:49:13 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine's brother (MrConfettiMan was in the streets while I was still yelling at the TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Glad to hear it. I was wondering by what miracle of military force we captured so many bridges intact. Napalm killed the defenders, leaving the bridges unharmed.

This undoubtedly shortened the length of the conflict, and probably reduced overall casualties as the rivers did not stand as natural barriers to advance.

Dead is dead, whether by bullet, frag, or napalm. Our side executed a brilliant, fast, highly accurate, minimal casualty operation. It is likely that fewer people died in the conflict than Saddam would have murdered by now.

In addition, I would like to add the obligatory:

"I love the smell of napalm in the morning!"
49 posted on 08/05/2003 11:49:49 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("Leave Pat, Leave!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fee
Allow me to express my regrets...that we were not allowed to use tacnukes instead. I saw Saddam's daughters on TV, and even though "Daddy" had killed their husbands painfully they were whining about how evil it was that Daddy was betrayed. Any culture that has this veiw of "honor" trumping the lives of one's spouse...well, the gloves are off. Bomb the warriors back to the stone age. If the civilians continue fighting, salt the fields.
50 posted on 08/05/2003 11:51:06 AM PDT by 50sDad ("Can't sleep...clowns will eat me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
"Daisy Cutters work pretty well too."

Now, now...thermobaric devices are frowned upon as well. We wouldn't want all that nasty overpressure squashing all of those innocent-till-proven-guilty Al Quaeda types into cave salsa would we?

51 posted on 08/05/2003 11:53:30 AM PDT by AngryJawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Yeah? So what?!
52 posted on 08/05/2003 12:00:04 PM PDT by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ecliptic
My sentiments EXACTLY!!!
53 posted on 08/05/2003 12:03:35 PM PDT by ImpotentRage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Scene from my favorite movie:

The deputies come out of hiding to view the body of Bad Bob, the gunslinger, who has a .50 caliber hole through the back.

"But he never had a chance..." say the deputies...

"No", says Judge Roy Bean, "he never did."

Musil described the Pentagon's distinction between napalm and Mark 77 firebombs as "pretty outrageous."
"That's clearly Orwellian," he added.

No, its not Orwellian. Eskimos have dozens of words to describe snow, because that is the coin of their realm. Soldiers acknowledge subtle distinctions in weaponry because this their specialty, and for those who do, rather than simply watch, the distinctions matter.

A true artist knows the difference between fuschia and purple. You don't use fuschia when you meant to use purple, and you don't use purple when only fuschia will do. It may seem like a subtlety without importance to the masses but that is why they get to show their work at the mall on the weekends and we have to pay $75 to take it home....

Or something like that.

54 posted on 08/05/2003 12:04:18 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I hope the dems seize on this issue. I would love to see Howard Dean taking Bush to task for this in the debates...
55 posted on 08/05/2003 12:04:25 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Physicians for Social Responsibility"

I suppose we should have given 'em all a half mil and held a barbeque for 'em. Just so all those murderous bastards know we're a friendly sort.

56 posted on 08/05/2003 12:05:49 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
OK, listen close. Here's the drill.

Invade their countries.

Done.

Kill their leaders

Doing it.

Convert them to Christianity

That's next.

If napalm can help, I'm all for it.

57 posted on 08/05/2003 12:06:40 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
""This additive has significantly less of an impact on the environment," wrote Marine spokesman Col. Michael Daily..."

For some reason, this statement brought a chuckle on...

58 posted on 08/05/2003 12:08:01 PM PDT by cibco (Xin Loi... Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"You can call it something other than napalm, but it's napalm," said John Pike, defense analyst with GlobalSecurity.com, a nonpartisan research group in Alexandria, Va.

Non-partisan my eye! The very first paragraph on their web site reads:

"We at GlobalSecurity.com support democracy, the United Nations, governments that respect the human rights of all people, and the rule of international law. We oppose monarchies, dictatorships, governments who ignore UN resolutions, and governments who invade sovereign countries in the absence of UN sanction."

The title of an article on the site is: "Our critics claim that we're 'left,' but we know we're right."

There's a graphic on the site with a picture of GWB and the words, "Visit America, home of the climate killers."

59 posted on 08/05/2003 12:12:12 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse
I did like the part about the new formula's environmental friendliness - do I see a Sierra Club award in the DoD's future?
60 posted on 08/05/2003 12:12:27 PM PDT by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson