Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officials confirm dropping firebombs on Iraqi troops - Results 'remarkably similar' to using napalm
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | August 5, 2003 | James W. Crawley

Posted on 08/05/2003 11:19:18 AM PDT by HAL9000

American jets killed Iraqi troops with firebombs – similar to the controversial napalm used in the Vietnam War – in March and April as Marines battled toward Baghdad.

Marine Corps fighter pilots and commanders who have returned from the war zone have confirmed dropping dozens of incendiary bombs near bridges over the Saddam Canal and the Tigris River. The explosions created massive fireballs.

"We napalmed both those (bridge) approaches," said Col. James Alles in a recent interview. He commanded Marine Air Group 11, based at Miramar Marine Corps Air Station, during the war. "Unfortunately, there were people there because you could see them in the (cockpit) video.

"They were Iraqi soldiers there. It's no great way to die," he added. How many Iraqis died, the military couldn't say. No accurate count has been made of Iraqi war casualties.

The bombing campaign helped clear the path for the Marines' race to Baghdad.

During the war, Pentagon spokesmen disputed reports that napalm was being used, saying the Pentagon's stockpile had been destroyed two years ago.

Apparently the spokesmen were drawing a distinction between the terms "firebomb" and "napalm." If reporters had asked about firebombs, officials said yesterday they would have confirmed their use.

What the Marines dropped, the spokesmen said yesterday, were "Mark 77 firebombs." They acknowledged those are incendiary devices with a function "remarkably similar" to napalm weapons.

Rather than using gasoline and benzene as the fuel, the firebombs use kerosene-based jet fuel, which has a smaller concentration of benzene.

Hundreds of partially loaded Mark 77 firebombs were stored on pre-positioned ammunition ships overseas, Marine Corps officials said. Those ships were unloaded in Kuwait during the weeks preceding the war.

"You can call it something other than napalm, but it's napalm," said John Pike, defense analyst with GlobalSecurity.com, a nonpartisan research group in Alexandria, Va.

Although many human rights groups consider incendiary bombs to be inhumane, international law does not prohibit their use against military forces. The United States has not agreed to a ban against possible civilian targets.

"Incendiaries create burns that are difficult to treat," said Robert Musil, executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility, a Washington group that opposes the use of weapons of mass destruction.

Musil described the Pentagon's distinction between napalm and Mark 77 firebombs as "pretty outrageous."

"That's clearly Orwellian," he added.

Developed during World War II and dropped on troops and Japanese cities, incendiary bombs have been used by American forces in nearly every conflict since. Their use became controversial during the Vietnam War when U.S. and South Vietnamese aircraft dropped millions of pounds of napalm. Its effects were shown in a Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph of Vietnamese children running from their burned village.

Before March, the last time U.S. forces had used napalm in combat was the Persian Gulf War, again by Marines.

During a recent interview about the bombing campaign in Iraq, Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Jim Amos confirmed aircraft dropped what he and other Marines continue to call napalm on Iraqi troops on several occasions. He commanded Marine jet and helicopter units involved in the Iraq war and leads the Miramar-based 3rd Marine Air Wing.

Miramar pilots familiar with the bombing missions pointed to at least two locations where firebombs were dropped.

Before the Marines crossed the Saddam Canal in central Iraq, jets dropped several firebombs on enemy positions near a bridge that would become the Marines' main crossing point on the road toward Numaniyah, a key town 40 miles from Baghdad.

Next, the bombs were used against Iraqis near a key Tigris River bridge, north of Numaniyah, in early April.

There were reports of another attack on the first day of the war.

Two embedded journalists reported what they described as napalm being dropped on an Iraqi observation post at Safwan Hill overlooking the Kuwait border.

Reporters for CNN and the Sydney (Australia) Morning Herald were told by unnamed Marine officers that aircraft dropped napalm on the Iraqi position, which was adjacent to one of the Marines' main invasion routes.

Their reports were disputed by several Pentagon spokesmen who said no such bombs were used nor did the United States have any napalm weapons.

The Pentagon destroyed its stockpile of napalm canisters, which had been stored near Camp Pendleton at the Fallbrook Naval Weapons Station, in April 2001.

Yesterday military spokesmen described what they see as the distinction between the two types of incendiary bombs. They said mixture used in modern firebombs is a less harmful mixture than Vietnam War-era napalm.

"This additive has significantly less of an impact on the environment," wrote Marine spokesman Col. Michael Daily, in an e-mailed information sheet provided by the Pentagon.

He added, "many folks (out of habit) refer to the Mark 77 as 'napalm' because its effect upon the target is remarkably similar."

In the e-mail, Daily also acknowledged that firebombs were dropped near Safwan Hill.

Alles, who oversaw the Safwan bombing raid, said 18 one-ton satellite-guided bombs, but no incendiary bombs, were dropped on the site.

Military experts say incendiary bombs can be an effective weapon in certain situations.

Firebombs are useful against dug-in troops and light vehicles, said GlobalSecurity's Pike.

"I used it routinely in Vietnam," said retired Marine Lt. Gen. Bernard Trainor, now a prominent defense analyst. "I have no moral compunction against using it. It's just another weapon."

And, the distinctive fireball and smell have a psychological impact on troops, experts said.

"The generals love napalm," said Alles, who has transferred to Washington. "It has a big psychological effect."



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aftermathanalysis; crispycritters; deadiraqisoldiers; firebombs; iraq; mark77; napalm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 08/05/2003 11:19:20 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"American jets killed Iraqi troops with firebombs – similar to the controversial napalm used in the Vietnam War..."

TFB.

2 posted on 08/05/2003 11:21:21 AM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
First guerilla warfare, now napalm. The liberal press is gleeful!
3 posted on 08/05/2003 11:22:50 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Winning is the only option and the quicker and easier you can kill the enemy the less Americans have to die. This is great news as far as I'm concerned.
4 posted on 08/05/2003 11:23:06 AM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Soccer Mom's flee the Rats for Bush in his flight suit: I call this the Moisture Factor. MF high!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
American jets killed Iraqi troops with firebombs

And your point is.....?

5 posted on 08/05/2003 11:23:13 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
sniff
6 posted on 08/05/2003 11:23:46 AM PDT by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I love the smell of napalm in the morning. It smells like victory.
7 posted on 08/05/2003 11:25:21 AM PDT by don'tbedenied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; wimpycat; Phantom Lord; dubyaismypresident

"I love the smell of napalm in the morning. It smells like... victory."

8 posted on 08/05/2003 11:25:22 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
[Sniff, sniff] Is that victory I'm smellin' in here?
9 posted on 08/05/2003 11:25:22 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Incendiaries create burns that are difficult to treat," said Robert Musil, executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility

Don't wanna treat 'em. Wanna kill 'em.

10 posted on 08/05/2003 11:25:57 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Maybe the DOD should switch over to the 5.56 "Nerf" round for our M16's to make the bedwetters happy. Wouldn't want to hurt anyone during a war, ya' know.
11 posted on 08/05/2003 11:26:10 AM PDT by AngryJawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
I love the smell of napalm in the morning....!
12 posted on 08/05/2003 11:27:03 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
There's only one right way: "Kill them, kill them all!!"
13 posted on 08/05/2003 11:28:08 AM PDT by Ecliptic (Keep looking to the sky)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
now napalm

I can't believe we're using weapons like this. If they keep it up, somebody's gonna get hurt!

14 posted on 08/05/2003 11:28:45 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Hostile troops are on/defending a bridge we need to leave in tact to advance.... we can A) fight it out and suffer losses, B)bomb the bridges with ordinance and then rebuild them slowing us dow, or C) Use lethat means to kill the defenders but leave the bridges in tact.....

This is a NO BRAINER, there is NOTHING remotely controversial about using this type of weapon in this scenario! War is ugly... always will be.. you fight, you die, things get blown up deal with it you pansy panty waste milk toast sissy leftists.
15 posted on 08/05/2003 11:29:36 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I suppose they could have dropped Hillary's pantsuit on them but she was too busy using them.
16 posted on 08/05/2003 11:29:45 AM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
"Incendiaries create burns that are difficult to treat," said Robert Musil, executive director of Physicians for Social Responsibility."

Don't wanna treat 'em. Wanna kill 'em."

I can just see the bumper sticker from that ...
Help the Physicians for Social Responsibility in the treatment of Incendiary burns ...
Make treatment unnecessary by dropping more napalm."

17 posted on 08/05/2003 11:30:13 AM PDT by BlueLancer (Der Elite Møøsenspåånkængrüppen ØberKømmååndø (EMØØK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
ROAST'EM!
18 posted on 08/05/2003 11:31:20 AM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Wow pilot look at all the crispy critters we created.
19 posted on 08/05/2003 11:31:20 AM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
They say it like it was a bad thing...

Would they have preferred it, if we killed them in hand-to-hand combat, losing thousands of US soldiers in the process?

And it isn't as if we didn't warn them.

We threw down thousands of flyers, telling the Iraqis to surrender or die, well, those that didn't surrender, died.

Any questions?
20 posted on 08/05/2003 11:31:32 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson