Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE BEGINNING OF THE END?
Yahoo News ^ | July 16th, 2003 | Ted Rall

Posted on 07/16/2003 5:44:18 PM PDT by FreedomCalls

Bush's Cover-Up Precedes the Scandal

NEW YORK--"When it's all said and done," Bush still confidently insists, "the people of the United States and the world will realize that Saddam Hussein had a weapons program." This once again begs the question of presidential dyslexia: You're supposed to find the WMDs before the war, silly rabbit!

This bizarro Administration does everything bass-ackwards. The recession is hardest on the poor and middle-class, so Bush gives tax cuts to the rich. When an overwhelming invasion force was needed to secure Afghanistan and Iraq, Rumsfeld sent in a skeleton crew. Now that the citizens of those countries want us to go home, Gen. Tommy Franks has announced that our 148,000-man, $5 billion-a-month occupation army will get bigger and stick around until whenever.

Now the Bushists are reversing the traditional lifecycle of every political ruckus from Teapot Dome to Watergate. Knowing that most scandals last as long as a mosquito, smart politicians wait to see whether a given outrage will spark lasting popular fury before concocting a risky cover-up. Not these guys. They've started the cover-up before the scandal has had a chance to catch on!

Little things hook big fish: tax evasion for Al Capone, a minor stock trade for Martha Stewart, a sexual dalliance for Bill Clinton). So it is with George W. Bush: whether or not the man who conned us into two wars ends up sharing a cage with Khalid Sheikh Mohammad could come down to this line from the 2003 State of the Union address: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

The source for that claim is a now-debunked British intelligence dossier from September 24, 2002. Forged letters in the UK report purport to document Iraq's attempts to purchase 550 tons of "yellowcake" uranium ore from Niger. No one is saying who forged the fake purchase orders, though Foreign Secretary Jack Straw claims that the "dodgy dossier" came from a third, unknown, nation.

"A bunch of bull," Ari Fleischer calls the simmering scandal, ridiculing the suggestion that fear of Iraqi nukes was "why we went to war, a central issue of why we went to war."

In fact, in the same State of the Union address in which he referenced Niger, Bush did make Iraqi nuclear weapons a "central issue." "Imagine those 19 hijackers with other weapons and other plans--this time armed by Saddam Hussein," Bush leered into the cameras. "It would take one vial, one canister, one crate slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we have ever known." Vials, canisters and crates refer to, respectively, biological, chemical and nuclear weapons.

Almost immediately after receiving it from the British, CIA analysts determined that the Niger info was probably bogus. According to The New York Times, CIA director George Tenet then personally met with Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley--Condi Rice's right-hand man--to make sure Bush didn't mention Niger uranium ore anymore. The UN's International Atomic Energy Agency went further, determining that Iraq simply didn't have a nuke program. Based on these facts, "The reference was omitted when Mr. Bush gave [a] speech in Cincinnati on October 7." And it stayed out of Bush's talks until it suddenly popped up in the State of the Union--despite more CIA warnings. Even then, Secretary of State Colin Powell refused to use it in his presentation to the UN a week later. "It was not standing the test of time," said a squeamish Powell.

Behold Slaughtergate's smoking gun: Not only had the CIA had told the White House about the Niger forgery in October 2002, the White House had gotten the message. Nonetheless Bush, after months of excising that argument from his speeches, revived it in January 2003 for use in what is traditionally the most widely watched TV appearance a president makes each year.

Many Americans knew that Bush was lying about Iraqi WMDs. They just didn't care, which is how he retains a 59 percent job approval rating. After getting called on his lies, a smarter politician would have apologized and said that liberating Iraq justified a few fibs.

Considering the conventional wisdom that Bush's idiocy is mitigated by his brilliant cabinet, Bush opted for a weird defense: I'm not a liar--my staff is incompetent! And so the cover-up began.

In the most transparently brokered deal since Ford's pardon of Nixon, Tenet agreed to take the blame for the Niger imbroglio in exchange for not taking the fall. "These 16 words should never have been included in the text written for the president," said Tenet in a prepared statement. "The president is pleased that the director of Central Intelligence acknowledged what needed to be acknowledged," said Ari Fleischer the next day. Bush got his patsy and Tenet kept his job. But career CIA staffers are furious at Bush for sticking them with the blame for a snafu they specifically tried to talk him out of. This is just beginning.

Lying about Niger yellowcake pales next to Bush's other evil chicanery: hobbling the U.S. economy with debt, feeding corporate corruption, opening concentration camps for Muslims and bombing thousands of people to death. But those acts are almost too monstrous to comprehend. Americans easily understand the myriad of little lies--the faked Jessica Lynch "rescue," the phony Saddam statue toppling and now the Niger uranium story--and how they add up to the character of a man unworthy of the office he holds.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: anarchist; anarchistsocialist; antiamerican; antibush; anticapitalist; barfalert; blameamericafirst; bushbashing; cartoonist; delusions; fifthcolumnist; hateamericafirst; icanttakemuchmore; idiot; idiotorial; jerk; rall; rallisabowelmovement; reddiaperbaby; socialist; tedrall; unamerican; usefulidiot; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
This is so full of lies and that five-letter word "deceit" that it just begs for a line-by-line fisking.
1 posted on 07/16/2003 5:44:18 PM PDT by FreedomCalls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Free Republic. More Bang For The Buck!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 07/16/2003 5:45:31 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Tediot!
Afte Rall.
3 posted on 07/16/2003 5:45:40 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud, hatch out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Isn't this guy a cartoonist? He should stick to drawing his stick figures.
4 posted on 07/16/2003 5:45:43 PM PDT by laurav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Ted Rall bilious emesis alert.
5 posted on 07/16/2003 5:46:08 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
This crap should not be posted on free republic.At best this makes julian bond speech look like love letters
6 posted on 07/16/2003 5:48:37 PM PDT by solo gringo (Always Ranting Always Rite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I'm not familiar with this Ted fellow, so I kept waiting for the punchline. Funny that he called the war in Afghanistan unjustified... I guess he saw no threat from AQ and their Taliban protectors. Odd fellow, is Ted.
7 posted on 07/16/2003 5:48:41 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
One has to appreciate the ability to cram so many untruths into so few words. Clinton would be proud.
8 posted on 07/16/2003 5:49:34 PM PDT by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
Well gee, Ted, can't you at least be happy that thousands of American died before President Bush declared war on terror? I can imagine how big a snit you'd be in if he'd saved all those lives at the cost of being mean to Bin Laden.
9 posted on 07/16/2003 5:49:57 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laurav
--the worst cartoonist presently disgracing the profession is also the worst writer of editorial material--you don't need to read Rall to know what he is going to say about anyone to the political right of Lenin--
10 posted on 07/16/2003 5:50:43 PM PDT by rellimpank (Stop immigration now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
What an idiot. Clinton also said he had WMD and bombed him, did he find the weapons first? Did Bush say he had found the weapons? Heck no. Are these just idiot lefties who can't stand it cause their socialist democrats aren't in power? Yes.
I seem to recall them screaming there was no evidence when anything came out about Clinton. I would like to return the favor.
There is no evidence anything he said is true.
11 posted on 07/16/2003 5:56:28 PM PDT by ladyinred (The left have blood on their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: william clark
Well gee, Ted, can't you at least be happy that thousands of American died before President Bush declared war on terror? I can imagine how big a snit you'd be in if he'd saved all those lives at the cost of being mean to Bin Laden.

If you were saying this about anyone other than Ted Rall, these remarks would qualify as hyberbole. But Rall is the guy who ran that horrid cartoon about "Terror Widows" making fun of women who lost their husbands in 9/11 and the war on terror. They are right on the money, taken at face value.

12 posted on 07/16/2003 6:03:22 PM PDT by murdoog (i just changed my tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: squidly
Ted Rall is a poor cartoonist too. His cartoons are even visually unappealing in addition to being politically objectionable.

He poked fun at the survivors and relatives of 9-11 victims and lost his job I thought. Why his black rants are even posted on FR, I can't explain.

Prairie
13 posted on 07/16/2003 6:03:29 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I'm a monthly donor to FRee Republic. And proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

14 posted on 07/16/2003 6:12:33 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls; Admin Moderator
Considering the conventional wisdom that Bush's idiocy is mitigated by his brilliant cabinet, Bush opted for a weird defense: I'm not a liar--my staff is incompetent! And so the cover-up began.

Teddy conveniently forgot how brave Mr. Clinton hid behind Janet Reno's skirts on Waco & Elian.

This bilge borders on ZOT material.

15 posted on 07/16/2003 6:15:53 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (Rats are showing all the symptoms of severe radiation poisoning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
In fact, in the same State of the Union address in which he referenced Niger

Never once did Bush mention "Niger" in the State of the Union Address. Show it to me Ted.

16 posted on 07/16/2003 6:24:42 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
What a complete load of crap! The liberal media has declared all out war on George W. Bush on behalf of the Democrats. No lie is too absurd for the left wing. They will say or do anything, not matter how deceitful and baseless, if they think it will help them elect a Democrat in 2004.

Fox News, Rush, Hannity, and sites like FR must fight back against the liberal smear job that has being going full blast for weeks.
17 posted on 07/16/2003 6:26:06 PM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
opening concentration camps for Muslims

We have opened a "concentration camp" (if you wish) for TERRORISTS. Is Rall saying that all Muslims are terrorists?

18 posted on 07/16/2003 6:26:49 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Blah blah blah. Nobody cares, and the liberals can go whine to mama about it for all the good it will do them. Bush wins wars, these namby pambies carp and complain. I hope North Korea, Iran or Syria is next, liberal!

The Iraqis are GLAD we went in, liberal! So are the majority of Americans, and you won't change that! Deal with it!

19 posted on 07/16/2003 6:33:09 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
I read the first 2 paragraphs and stopped. Did Mo turn into a man? Sheesh!

FMCDH

20 posted on 07/16/2003 6:33:30 PM PDT by nothingnew (the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson