Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumor on News Radio 620 - WTMJ - Supreme Court Justice to Announce Retirement
WTMJ - Milwaukee | 6/26/2003 | Charlie Sykes

Posted on 06/26/2003 7:01:14 AM PDT by WI Conservative 4 Bush

I just heard on the radio that there is buzz that a Supreme Court Justice will announce retirement today. Please let it be Ruthie!!!


TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 06/26/2003 7:01:14 AM PDT by WI Conservative 4 Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
Its supposedly Rehnquist judging by news reports (and we know how accurate THOSE are!)
2 posted on 06/26/2003 7:03:16 AM PDT by The G Man (Rule #3 of Fight Club: Never pen a 'tell all' book about Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
Drudge, on the Sean Hannity radio show yesterday, said he was convinced that there was going to be an announcement today. Probably the same source. We'll know soon, I guess. It's probably too much to hope that it's Stevens.
3 posted on 06/26/2003 7:05:45 AM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Supposedly informed scuttlebutt was that it is O'Connor. I certainly WISH it is either Stevens or Ginsburg, and HOPE its the stealth leftist Souter.
4 posted on 06/26/2003 7:05:55 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
I heard Tommy Daschle last night whine that the Senate Dems better be consulted BEFORE any nominations are made to the Supreme Court. If Rehnquist goes, Bush has every right to nominate a hardline conservative.

I actually think a fight on Bush's Supreme Court nomination could really hurt the Dems. Kind of like bringing the Estrada tactics to the forefront. We shall see....
5 posted on 06/26/2003 7:05:58 AM PDT by WI Conservative 4 Bush (Nobody speaks English, and everything's broken...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laconic
I predict it's two...Stevens AND Sandra...the Dems new strategy, since the are finally getting the idea that the GOP will play hardball in the Senate, is to get a lib and a conservative....i.e...keep the current balance, in the interest of "fairness"....they'll figure it's better than losing all three seats...
6 posted on 06/26/2003 7:08:34 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
Bush has every right to nominate a hardline conservative.

And the obligation. My vote: J. Michael Luttig of the Fourth Circuit.

7 posted on 06/26/2003 7:11:22 AM PDT by HumanaeVitae (Catholic Epimethean)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: laconic
Hopefully it's O'connor.

She is a shame to her faith and the court, and she has been the pivotal figure on bad rulings. With Ginsburg and the others, we know where they stand. One can never tell with O'connor.
8 posted on 06/26/2003 7:14:42 AM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
As we post, Sandra is right this moment flipping a coin..heads I go..tails I stay....
9 posted on 06/26/2003 7:16:41 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
Drudge said on Hannity radio program yesterday that at last one justice might announce retirement very soon. He didn't say which. However, several (nearl all) are having age-related problems. Drudge mentioned one justice lost urinal control during a recent news conference.

Drudge also indicated that the biggest summer event will be the hearings for any SC judicial nominee--it will be down and dirty.

Pubbies in the Senate need to their things in order fast, or the SC process will be a fiasco like the 2+ current filibusters.
10 posted on 06/26/2003 7:17:40 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1stFreedom
Good point on O'Connor. I liken her to a bad referee in sports. One day she's a constructionist, then the next day she feels the need to 'even out' by legislating from the bench. She's a real waffler.

Looks like they just struck down the Texas sodomy law.
11 posted on 06/26/2003 7:20:29 AM PDT by WI Conservative 4 Bush (Nobody speaks English, and everything's broken...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
".... Looks like they just struck down the Texas sodomy law..."

Does this mean the Texas Dem legislators don't have to go to the Motel 6 in Oklahoma any more?

12 posted on 06/26/2003 7:37:48 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
I heard Matt Drudge on Hannity yesterday. He said Thurgood Marshall, on one of his last if not his last, press conference, lost urinal control. This comment was to prove that these judges often overstay their physical competence.

g

13 posted on 06/26/2003 7:43:45 AM PDT by Geezerette (... but young at heart!-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Maybe she will break into that ole Durante song....
14 posted on 06/26/2003 7:44:09 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
is to get a lib and a conservative

Dem idea of fair is a communist and a RINO.
15 posted on 06/26/2003 9:43:03 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WI Conservative 4 Bush
Want a scary thought?

Clarence Thomas.

16 posted on 06/26/2003 10:37:44 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette
I heard Matt Drudge on Hannity yesterday. He said Thurgood Marshall, on one of his last if not his last, press conference, lost urinal control.

“Urinal control?!?!” Does that mean he couldn’t figure out how to flush one? 8-)

I remember how bats-ass crazy he was when he was still on the court. In an interview, a reporter asked him his opinion on Ronald Reagan. He answered, “I do not wish to speak ill of the dead.” When the reporter pointed out to him that Reagan wasn’t dead, he got all confused and couldn’t answer any more questions.

17 posted on 06/26/2003 10:40:58 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dead
I was going to say, as long as it's not Thomas I couldn't care less.

Scalia has some salvagable qualities, but Renquist is for the most part a statist old fart.

18 posted on 06/26/2003 10:46:43 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dead
The best scenario would be Ginsburg or one of the other liberals, but that ain't happening. I certainly wouldnt mind watch Sandra "I get all the attention because I'm a swing vote" Day O'Conner put out to pasture.

I take back my previous post, I kinda to care now that I think of it. Thomas needs to live to be 436 around years old.

19 posted on 06/26/2003 10:50:00 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST
Whenever I want to annoy a liberal, I point out to them that Clarence Thomas is likely to still be on the court a quarter century from now.

It makes them want to cry.

20 posted on 06/26/2003 10:56:03 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson