To: laconic
Hopefully it's O'connor.
She is a shame to her faith and the court, and she has been the pivotal figure on bad rulings. With Ginsburg and the others, we know where they stand. One can never tell with O'connor.
To: 1stFreedom
As we post, Sandra is right this moment flipping a coin..heads I go..tails I stay....
9 posted on
06/26/2003 7:16:41 AM PDT by
ken5050
To: 1stFreedom
Good point on O'Connor. I liken her to a bad referee in sports. One day she's a constructionist, then the next day she feels the need to 'even out' by legislating from the bench. She's a real waffler.
Looks like they just struck down the Texas sodomy law.
To: 1stFreedom
Sandra Day O'Connor is a Unitarian which might indicate that her Unitarian confreres are probably quite comfortable with her lifeline extended to Roe vs. Wade. Her husband's name is O'Connor and that is no guarantee nowadays that he is Catholic either if you are suggesting that she is Catholic. The disgrace to Catholicism on the current SCOTUS is Anthony Kennedy. Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia are Catholics who vote like Catholics. Rehnquist may be Episcopalian(?). Souter is Episcopalian. Breyer and Ginsberg are Jewish. Stevens is some sort of mainline Protestant. The pro-aborts are a disgrace to humanity never mind their respective faiths.
29 posted on
06/27/2003 4:34:06 PM PDT by
BlackElk
(Viva Cristo Rey!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson