Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Icy Claim That Water Has Memory
New Scientist ^ | 6-11-2003 | Lionel Milgrom

Posted on 06/12/2003 8:21:56 AM PDT by blam

Icy claim that water has memory

19:00 11 June 03

Claims do not come much more controversial than the idea that water might retain a memory of substances once dissolved in it. The notion is central to homeopathy, which treats patients with samples so dilute they are unlikely to contain a single molecule of the active compound, but it is generally ridiculed by scientists.

Holding such a heretical view famously cost one of France's top allergy researchers, Jacques Benveniste, his funding, labs and reputation after his findings were discredited in 1988.

Yet a paper is about to be published in the reputable journal Physica A claiming to show that even though they should be identical, the structure of hydrogen bonds in pure water is very different from that in homeopathic dilutions of salt solutions. Could it be time to take the "memory" of water seriously?

The paper's author, Swiss chemist Louis Rey, is using thermoluminescence to study the structure of solids. The technique involves bathing a chilled sample with radiation. When the sample is warmed up, the stored energy is released as light in a pattern that reflects the atomic structure of the sample.

Twin peaks

When Rey used the method on ice he saw two peaks of light, at temperatures of around 120 K and 170 K. Rey wanted to test the idea, suggested by other researchers, that the 170 K peak reflects the pattern of hydrogen bonds within the ice. In his experiments he used heavy water (which contains the heavy hydrogen isotope deuterium), because it has stronger hydrogen bonds than normal water.

Unexplained results

After studying pure samples, Rey looked at solutions of lithium chloride and sodium chloride. Lithium chloride destroys hydrogen bonds, as does sodium chloride, but to a lesser extent. Sure enough, the peak was smaller for a solution of sodium chloride, and disappeared completely for a lithium chloride solution.

Aware of homeopaths' claims that patterns of hydrogen bonds can survive successive dilutions, Rey decided to test samples that had been diluted down to a notional 10-30 grams per cubic centimetre - way beyond the point when any ions of the original substance could remain. "We thought it would be of interest to challenge the theory," he says.

Each dilution was made according to a strict protocol, and vigorously stirred at each stage, as homeopaths do. When Rey compared the ultra-dilute lithium and sodium chloride solutions with pure water that had been through the same process, the difference in their thermoluminescence peaks compared with pure water was still there (see graph).

"Much to our surprise, the thermoluminescence glows of the three systems were substantially different," he says. He believes the result proves that the networks of hydrogen bonds in the samples were different.

Phase transition

Martin Chaplin from London's South Bank University, an expert on water and hydrogen bonding, is not so sure. "Rey's rationale for water memory seems most unlikely," he says. "Most hydrogen bonding in liquid water rearranges when it freezes."

He points out that the two thermoluminescence peaks Rey observed occur around the temperatures where ice is known to undergo transitions between different phases. He suggests that tiny amounts of impurities in the samples, perhaps due to inefficient mixing, could be getting concentrated at the boundaries between different phases in the ice and causing the changes in thermoluminescence.

But thermoluminescence expert Raphael Visocekas from the Denis Diderot University of Paris, who watched Rey carry out some of his experiments, says he is convinced. "The experiments showed a very nice reproducibility," he told New Scientist. "It is trustworthy physics." He see no reason why patterns of hydrogen bonds in the liquid samples should not survive freezing and affect the molecular arrangement of the ice.

After his own experience, Benveniste advises caution. "This is interesting work, but Rey's experiments were not blinded and although he says the work is reproducible, he doesn't say how many experiments he did," he says. "As I know to my cost, this is such a controversial field, it is mandatory to be as foolproof as possible."

Lionel Milgrom


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: claim; icy; memory; techindex; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 06/12/2003 8:21:57 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
As I get older, I find my memory is more cloudy than it used to be. So, I guess, clouds being water in vaporous form, that this may all be true.
2 posted on 06/12/2003 8:29:28 AM PDT by keithtoo (Luvya Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery; editor-surveyor
ping
3 posted on 06/12/2003 8:31:32 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
10-30 grams per cc is an absurdly HIGH concentration.

I hope they ment micrograms or picograms or something.

Innumerate reporters.

--Boris

4 posted on 06/12/2003 8:38:24 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
A common HTML glitch, it was ten to the minus 30 in the original article.
5 posted on 06/12/2003 8:43:32 AM PDT by tictoc (On FreeRepublic, discussion is a contact sport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam
Rey decided to test samples that had been diluted down to a notional 10-30 grams per cubic centimetre

Something is seriously wrong here, my Lange's Handbook states that a deci-normal solution of sodium chloride is only .005845 grams per cc of 1/10 normal solution so to accept the rest of this sentence, - way beyond the point when any ions of the original substance could remain boggles my little mind.

10-30 grams per cc seems to me to be pretty heavy.

6 posted on 06/12/2003 8:58:38 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tictoc
10-30 does look more reasonable.
7 posted on 06/12/2003 9:04:41 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam
I would not put my 2 cents on this (yet). Water/ice is a very interesting thing with at least 11 phases. see here

http://www.cmmp.ucl.ac.uk/people/finney/soi.html

some more experiments please.
8 posted on 06/12/2003 9:28:53 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
One reason that there are anomolous results in things (Bell's Theorem, Homeopathy, etc.) is that the underlying assumption is that we are dealing with particles -- little balls that have simple attributes like electric charge by which they interact. But of course the reality is quite different. P-brane theory indicates that there are many more than just 3 physical dimensions (probably 10 or 11).

So take Bell's Theorem as an example. A layman's explanation of the theorem might be: "No local deterministic hidden-variable theory is capable of reproducing the results of quantum mechanics. [In other words] quantum potential MUST be non-local for it to work. Another way of looking at it is particles must be connected at superluminal speeds. (Hence why Einstein didn't like it...)". Now in a 3D reality this is an issue. But in a 10D or 11D reality it isn't, because those "particles" are part of nD (where n=10 or 11) structures. Thus even though the particles might be separated in 3D space by a distance that would violate the speed of light for information transfer, and yet we know (from experiment) that such information transfer does occur, if those particles are not truly separated (as they appear in 3D) but are really still connected (in nD) then the resolution of how such information "transfer" becomes feasible.

So here we have an experiment that demonstrates that yes, there is something "there" in homeopathy. In a 3D reality homeopathy is junk, a fake, a fraud, a scam. But we don't live in a 3D reality. Therefore, there may be "memory" in the higher order components of an nD structure that would not be possible in a 3D structure. Now, does this experiment "prove" homeopathy? No. It merely indicates that more experiments should be done in this area -- first to validate that the results of this experiement are reproducible, and if so, then to do some more experiments to see what the heck is going on.

9 posted on 06/12/2003 9:40:46 AM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP; *tech_index; shadowman99; Sparta; freedom9; martin_fierro; PatriotGames; ...
Thanks for the ping! Hmmm!

OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST

10 posted on 06/12/2003 9:42:14 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Recall Gray Davis and then start on the other Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'll put more value on the comments made by the fellow with the expertise in water and hydrogen bonding. Expertise in thermoluminescence , while interesting, says that this fellow is an expert in a test regime not on its meaning. This will turn out to be as fleeting as cold fusion
11 posted on 06/12/2003 9:46:21 AM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord; PatrickHenry; Physicist
One reason that there are anomolous results in things (Bell's Theorem, Homeopathy, etc.) is that the underlying assumption is that we are dealing with particles -- little balls that have simple attributes like electric charge by which they interact. But of course the reality is quite different. P-brane theory indicates that there are many more than just 3 physical dimensions (probably 10 or 11).</>

You must be joking Mr. Dark_Lord!

12 posted on 06/12/2003 9:50:52 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
Hey, those scientists should take it easy there.. don't wanna have life imitating art.


13 posted on 06/12/2003 9:51:16 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
You must be joking Mr. Dark_Lord!

Yes, I meant M-brane, not P-brane, sorry.

14 posted on 06/12/2003 9:56:29 AM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
If dilution doesn't remove the effect of the salt, how ever did they clean the beaker in which they ran the tests? Surely it must have touched the pitch of undistilled water at some point in its life, which means it once contained some concentration of salt. Anything they did to it from then on was strictly a matter of successive dilution...and yet, they managed to get a "null result" from distilled water.

Hmmm....
15 posted on 06/12/2003 10:25:51 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
If dilution doesn't remove the effect of the salt, how ever did they clean the beaker in which they ran the tests?

If you hadn't gone and done that, this thread could have continued for hundreds of posts.

16 posted on 06/12/2003 10:35:56 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
You must be joking Mr. Dark_Lord! Yes, I meant M-brane, not P-brane, sorry.

I do not think that string theory has anything to do with Homeopathy as you write about in your previous post. That is why I write about joking.
17 posted on 06/12/2003 10:44:44 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
"P-brane theory indicates that there are many more than just 3 physical dimensions (probably 10 or 11)."

I've read theories that electro-magnetism is the consequence of something that's going on in the 10th dimension. Hmmmm

18 posted on 06/12/2003 11:04:33 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
"I would not put my 2 cents on this (yet). Water/ice is a very interesting thing with at least 11 phases.

I read an interesting article not to long ago about ice that is formed in the vaccum of deep space is flexible and will actually flow.

19 posted on 06/12/2003 11:07:07 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith
Most "articles" on homeopathy are self serving attemps by new age scam artist snake oil salesmen to sell "potions" to the gullible. That does not invalidate the concepts of homeopathy.

What is homeopathy?

Dr Samuel Hahnemann published his theory of homeopathy (in 1810, so this is not something new), from the Greek homoios (same) and pathos (suffering).

What is the approach?

Remedies are diluted on the decimal scale (x) with a dilution factor of 1:10, or on the centesimal scale (c) with a dilution factor of 1:100. A decimal dilution of 6x is said to equal one part in a million; roughly equivalent to a pinch of salt in a bath of water. On the centesimal scale, a 12c potency is comparable to a pinch of salt in the Atlantic Ocean. After each dilution, the mixture is shaken vigorously (known as succussion) to transfer ‘energy’ from the substance and potentiate its healing properties. According to one theory, the diluted liquid keeps an electromagnetic ‘footprint’ or ‘memory’ of the original substance.

Now, in a 3D Newtonian worldview, this is clearly bullsh*t. But of course, we don't live in a 3D world. The relationship between M-brane theory and homeopathy is that the "deeper structures" are impacted by the changes to the 3D interface. The question is, is this true? The only way to determine its validity is by experiment. An nD reality perspective admits that homeopathy might have some validity, therefore experiments to validate it are required. A 3D perspective starts from the a priori perspective that it is a scam and bad science, and no one wants to do the experiments because of course no scientist wants to be a National Enquirer, World Weekly News, trailer park kind of scientist.

20 posted on 06/12/2003 1:21:47 PM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson