Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/12/2003 8:21:57 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: blam
As I get older, I find my memory is more cloudy than it used to be. So, I guess, clouds being water in vaporous form, that this may all be true.
2 posted on 06/12/2003 8:29:28 AM PDT by keithtoo (Luvya Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; sourcery; editor-surveyor
ping
3 posted on 06/12/2003 8:31:32 AM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
10-30 grams per cc is an absurdly HIGH concentration.

I hope they ment micrograms or picograms or something.

Innumerate reporters.

--Boris

4 posted on 06/12/2003 8:38:24 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Rey decided to test samples that had been diluted down to a notional 10-30 grams per cubic centimetre

Something is seriously wrong here, my Lange's Handbook states that a deci-normal solution of sodium chloride is only .005845 grams per cc of 1/10 normal solution so to accept the rest of this sentence, - way beyond the point when any ions of the original substance could remain boggles my little mind.

10-30 grams per cc seems to me to be pretty heavy.

6 posted on 06/12/2003 8:58:38 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I would not put my 2 cents on this (yet). Water/ice is a very interesting thing with at least 11 phases. see here

http://www.cmmp.ucl.ac.uk/people/finney/soi.html

some more experiments please.
8 posted on 06/12/2003 9:28:53 AM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
One reason that there are anomolous results in things (Bell's Theorem, Homeopathy, etc.) is that the underlying assumption is that we are dealing with particles -- little balls that have simple attributes like electric charge by which they interact. But of course the reality is quite different. P-brane theory indicates that there are many more than just 3 physical dimensions (probably 10 or 11).

So take Bell's Theorem as an example. A layman's explanation of the theorem might be: "No local deterministic hidden-variable theory is capable of reproducing the results of quantum mechanics. [In other words] quantum potential MUST be non-local for it to work. Another way of looking at it is particles must be connected at superluminal speeds. (Hence why Einstein didn't like it...)". Now in a 3D reality this is an issue. But in a 10D or 11D reality it isn't, because those "particles" are part of nD (where n=10 or 11) structures. Thus even though the particles might be separated in 3D space by a distance that would violate the speed of light for information transfer, and yet we know (from experiment) that such information transfer does occur, if those particles are not truly separated (as they appear in 3D) but are really still connected (in nD) then the resolution of how such information "transfer" becomes feasible.

So here we have an experiment that demonstrates that yes, there is something "there" in homeopathy. In a 3D reality homeopathy is junk, a fake, a fraud, a scam. But we don't live in a 3D reality. Therefore, there may be "memory" in the higher order components of an nD structure that would not be possible in a 3D structure. Now, does this experiment "prove" homeopathy? No. It merely indicates that more experiments should be done in this area -- first to validate that the results of this experiement are reproducible, and if so, then to do some more experiments to see what the heck is going on.

9 posted on 06/12/2003 9:40:46 AM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I'll put more value on the comments made by the fellow with the expertise in water and hydrogen bonding. Expertise in thermoluminescence , while interesting, says that this fellow is an expert in a test regime not on its meaning. This will turn out to be as fleeting as cold fusion
11 posted on 06/12/2003 9:46:21 AM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Hey, those scientists should take it easy there.. don't wanna have life imitating art.


13 posted on 06/12/2003 9:51:16 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
If dilution doesn't remove the effect of the salt, how ever did they clean the beaker in which they ran the tests? Surely it must have touched the pitch of undistilled water at some point in its life, which means it once contained some concentration of salt. Anything they did to it from then on was strictly a matter of successive dilution...and yet, they managed to get a "null result" from distilled water.

Hmmm....
15 posted on 06/12/2003 10:25:51 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
As an aside, the title of this article reminds me of "Blood Makes Noise". One of the mostly (unknown) simple pleasures to have been released during the 90s...


22 posted on 06/12/2003 3:20:52 PM PDT by tuna_battle_slight_return (Foam is good; foam saves lives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

23 posted on 06/12/2003 3:20:58 PM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson