Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Muslim" Driver's License Woman Is Convicted Child Abuser: See Her UNVEILED (Ulterior Motive?)
The Smoking Gun ^ | May 29, 2003

Posted on 05/29/2003 11:32:30 AM PDT by Timesink

MAY 28--Turns out the Florida woman who is suing for the right to wear a Muslim headdress in a driver's license photograph has previously been subjected to an, um, unveiled government portrait. Following her 1997 conversion to Islam, Sultaana Freeman (formerly Sandra Keller) was arrested in Decatur, Illinois for battering a foster child. Freeman, 35, pleaded guilty in 1999 to felony aggravated battery and was sentenced to 18 months probation. As a result of the conviction, state officials removed two foster children from Freeman's care. The mug shot of the felonious Freeman (below left) was taken after her arrest in the Illinois case. Freeman returned to the dock this week--that's her testifying in the below right photo--to challenge Florida rules requiring prospective drivers to submit to unveiled photos for their licenses. Last year, Freeman sued the state after her license was revoked when she failed to allow officials to photograph her sans headdress. State officials contend that, in light of the September 11 attacks, it is crucial that all motorists now be photographed in an unadorned state. (1 page)

For more on Freeman's case, check out Court TV's coverage.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; US: Florida; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: battery; burka; childabuse; convictedfelon; felon; fosterchildren; id; islam; nutball; sandrakeller; sultaanafreeman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 next last
To: george wythe
I think that's the Amish. Parsing language screws up your diatribe.

I don't see any Amish on I-95 frankly, driving their buggies, or else I drive so fast that I miss seeing them.
121 posted on 05/29/2003 6:44:08 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift
ping
122 posted on 05/29/2003 6:46:17 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
  1. The Amish do not get driver's licenses, for reasons that should be stunningly obvious.
  2. Other Muslim women have had their pictures taken. You do not get to make up religious convictions for your own convenience. Think: ulterior motive.

-- 05/29/2003 10:16 AM EDT

Ping to toot my own horn! I'll just be over here doing my prescience dance.

123 posted on 05/29/2003 6:46:53 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: RussRoberts
Driver’s identification rules in Muslim nations:

Saudi Arabia: Women aren't allowed to drive

Iran: Women wear a traditional chador, which does not cover the face.

Egypt: Women do not cover their face in I.D. pictures

United Arab Emirates: Women do not cover their face in I.D. pictures

Oman: Women do not cover their face in I.D. pictures

Kuwait: Women do not cover their face in I.D. pictures

Qatar: Women do not cover their face in I.D. pictures

Bahrain: Women do not cover their face in I.D. pictures

Jordan: Women can drive if their faces are covered but do not cover their face in I.D. pictures
124 posted on 05/29/2003 7:07:17 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: riri
It's gotta get hot in Florida wearing that get up.

I agree. I see Muslim women walking around my area, southern California, and I wonder why they don't drop from heat stroke.

I used to see a group of local high school girls jog past my office window each day. One of them was a Muslim, wearing a long robe and head scarf. Just watching her made me want to faint from the heat.
125 posted on 05/29/2003 7:43:40 PM PDT by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Following her 1997 conversion to Islam, Sultaana Freeman (formerly Sandra Keller) was arrested in Decatur, Illinois for battering a foster child. Freeman, 35, pleaded guilty in 1999 to felony aggravated battery and was sentenced to 18 months probation.

Case: 1998 CF 001472 D 001

Litigant: FREEMAN, SULTAANA

Closed Date: 07/09/1999

Date Remarks

10/05/98 **Complaint filed on 10/01/1998.

10/05/98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

10/05/98 People by Mr. Sauer. Defendant fails to appear.

10/05/98 Motion for bench warrant.

10/05/98 Hearing set for 10/26/1998 at 09:00 in courtroom 1.

10/05/98 People to send notice.

10/05/98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

10/19/98 Notice of Hearing on file as of Oct 19, 1998. lb

10/19/98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

10/26/98 People by Mr. Sauer. Defendant present. Entry of appearance of

10/26/98 Mrs. Waller. Motion for bench warrant denied. Defendant present

10/26/98 pursuant to bond. Defendant's age is 30. Defendant waives

10/26/98 arraignment.

10/26/98 Preliminary hrg set for 11/05/1998 at 10:00 in courtroom 3B.

10/26/98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

11/05/98 State's Attorney, Mr. Fichter, present. Deft. present

11/05/98 and with counsel, Ms. Waller. Cause called for preliminary hearing.

11/05/98 Sworn evidence heard. Finding there is probable cause

11/05/98 to believe the defendant committed the offenses in the Information.

11/05/98 Pretrial Discovery Order and Answer on file.

11/05/98 Defendant admonished as to his right to be tried and sentenced

11/05/98 in absentia. All motions to be filed by December 18, 1998.

11/05/98 Status hearing set for 11/30/1998 at 01:30 in courtroom 3A.

11/05/98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

11/30/98 Assistant State's Attorney Jack Ahola present. Defendant

11/30/98 not present. Attorney Ruth Waller present

11/30/98 for Defendant. On motion of the Defendant, case reallotted for

11/30/98 status hearing on January 4, 1999, at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 3A.

11/30/98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

01/04/99 Assistant State's Attorney Jack Ahola present. Defendant

01/04/99 not present. Attorney Ruth Waller present

01/04/99 for Defendant. On motion of the Defendant, case reallotted for

01/04/99 status hearing on February 1, 1999 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 3A.

01/04/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

02/01/99 Assistant State's Attorney Jack Ahola present for the People.

02/01/99 Defendant present with counsel, Mrs. Ruth Waller. Agreed Motion to

02/01/99 Withdraw FILED this day. Case is continued for appearance of

02/01/99 Defendant and counsel February 22, 1999, at 1:30 p.m., in

02/01/99 Courtroom 3A.

02/01/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

02/22/99 Assistant State's Attorney Richard Foote present. Attorney Glenn

02/22/99 Fuller present and enters his appearance for the Defendant.

02/22/99 Case set for status hearing on April 5, 1999 at 1:30 p.m. in

02/22/99 courtroom 3A.

02/22/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

04/05/99 Assistant State's Attorney Jack Ahola present. Defendant

04/05/99 not present. Attorney Glenn Fuller present

04/05/99 for Defendant. Representation discovery completed. No pending

04/05/99 pretrial motions. Case allotted for pretrial on May 3, 1999

04/05/99 at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3A.

04/05/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

05/03/99 Assistant State's Attorney Jack Ahola present. Defendant

05/03/99 not present. Attorney Glenn Fuller present

05/03/99 for Defendant. Representation discovery completed. No pending

05/03/99 pretrial motions. Case allotted for pretrial on July 6, 1999

05/03/99 at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3A.

05/03/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

07/06/99 Assistant State's Attorney Jack Ahola present. Attorney

07/06/99 Glenn Fuller present for Defendant. Defendant not present.

07/06/99 Case set for Dispositional Hearing on July 9, 1999 at 11:00 a.m.

07/06/99 in courtroom 3A.

07/06/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

07/09/99 Assistant State's Attorney Scott Rueter and Defendant present

07/09/99 with Attorney Glenn Fuller. Information amended to charge the

07/09/99 Class 3 crime of Aggravated Battery. Defendant withdraws not guilty

07/09/99 plea and tenders a plea of guilty. Defendant admonished pursuant to

07/09/99 Supreme Court Rule 402(a). Written jury waiver filed. Court finds

07/09/99 that the admission is knowingly and voluntarily made and that there

07/09/99 is a fact basis for the admission. Judgment of conviction is

07/09/99 entered for the Class 3 crime of Aggravated Battery (Count I).

07/09/99 Counts II and III are dismissed. Court advised regarding Defendant's

07/09/99 prior criminal history. Defendant waives Pre-sentence Report.

07/09/99 Case called for immediate sentence hearing. Defendant is sentenced

07/09/99 to a term of probation for 18 months. Defendant is ordered to pay

07/09/99 a $25 per month probation service fee and court costs. Certificate

07/09/99 of Conditions filed this day. Defendant's cash bail surety is

07/09/99 applied to payment of fines, fees and costs. Balance of fines, fees

07/09/99 and costs to be paid within 60 days. Defendant is advised

07/09/99 regarding her right to appeal.

07/09/99 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

01/16/01 Order of Discharge from Probation entered and filed.

01/16/01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

126 posted on 05/30/2003 10:14:20 AM PDT by Ford Fairlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Just another wort on society.
127 posted on 05/30/2003 10:21:04 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ford Fairlane
She really liked visiting the courthouse ---

1989 TR 013414 D 001 KELLER, SANDRA M 11/22/1967 DRIVING 21-25 MPH ABOVE LIMIT *

1997 OP 000399 P 001 KELLER, SANDRA M __/__/____ *

1997 MR 000209 P 001 KELLER, SANDRA MICHELLE __/__/____ *

1998 CF 001472 D 001 FREEMAN, SULTAANA 11/22/1967 AGG BATTERY/GREAT BODILY HARM *

2000 SC 000207 D 001 FREEMAN, SULTAANA __/__/____ *

2001 CH 000091 D 001 FREEMAN, SULTAANA L F/K/A MYKE, __/__/____ *

1998 TR 025996 D 001 FREEMAN, SULTAANA LAKIANA MYKE 11/22/1967 REGIS EXPIRATION/1ST & 2ND *

2000 SC 000086 D 001 FREEMAN, SULTAANA LIKIANA ET AL __/__/____ *

128 posted on 05/30/2003 10:26:08 AM PDT by Ford Fairlane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
I don't see any Amish on I-95 frankly, driving their buggies, or else I drive so fast that I miss seeing them.
Last week, at a district justice's office just north of here, two Amishmen pulled up in buggies, came out of the snow into the warm and were found guilty of failing to mount state-mandated reflective orange triangles on their carriages.

The fine was $100 apiece.

An hour later, at a district justice's office 10 miles to the north, the routine was repeated, this time with three Amishmen, all found guilty, each fined $100.

Nobody paid up, though.

"We don't think it's too much to impose on these people. It's good enough for everybody else," said Ted Farabaugh, a township supervisor in West Carroll Township, home to many of the Swartzentrubers. "Take away the triangle, and people have less chance to see the buggies. Then, there's going to be a head-on collision, with people trying to avoid them."

In Ohio, the largest single Amish enclave in the world, a study done through the state Department of Transportation and Ohio State University branded the orange reflective triangle "the single most recognizable emblem" to mark slow-moving traffic. That's important, Ohio Highway Patrol Lt. Joel Smith said, since the driver of a 55-mph vehicle bearing down on a 5-mph buggy will see the gap between them close from 500 feet to 44 feet in six seconds.

The new cases, and any more that come along, will be joined in a court fight framing a state traffic code provision as infringing on religious liberties of a small sliver of the state's Amish population, said Witold Walczak, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Greater Pittsburgh Chapter.
The fight centers on a tiny, 88-year-old branch called Swartzentruber Amish, rigid by even mainline Amish standards. While the rest of the Amish spectrum has adopted, sometimes grudgingly, the orange triangles, the Swartzentrubers refuse.

source


129 posted on 05/30/2003 11:43:21 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
No, please tell us what word you'd rather use than the word far-left media writers and blood-sucking lawyers use?

I guess you don't have any constructive contribution, just trying to nickpick after being shown how wrong you were about fundamentalist Christians getting special rights in this country.

130 posted on 05/30/2003 11:44:56 AM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Wrong, George. I asked you kindly to post the case info so I could educate myself. Then we got sidelined by your refusal to answer the simple question of why you're hung up on using the phrase Christian fundamentalist (no different, really, than your latest phrase, fundamentalist Christian.)

As for your lame argument about the Amish, that's a non sequitur.

You are confused between "special rights" and applied rights. The Amish have applied the rights that we all have, and haven't been signigicantly "defeated" in their application to date. They've lost some battles in some states, but mostly they've held their own. But you did mischaracterize their use of non-powered vehicles in the vast majority of cases.

Maybe you're jealous because you don't have the courage to take a bold stand for your rights. Instead, you punch your keyboard and make like you're some great scholar, above the fray. Ha.

131 posted on 05/30/2003 2:31:30 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
I asked you kindly to post the case info so I could educate myself

It is obvious you did not read the case, since you keep making uneducated statements.

I won't bother to answer your uninformed comments anymore.

132 posted on 05/30/2003 2:35:26 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
She ain't flying on any aircraft I'm on!!
133 posted on 05/30/2003 2:41:52 PM PDT by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
It's like deja-vu all over again!
134 posted on 05/30/2003 2:41:56 PM PDT by Prov1322 (Have you thanked God again today that George W. Bush is our President?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
That's rich. Your misrepresentations are so deep they border on lying, George. Anyone can read this thread and see how loose you've been with the truth.

You're doing the forum a favor by not responding. You should take that track on all threads.

135 posted on 05/30/2003 2:43:49 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar
All she needs is a beard...
136 posted on 05/30/2003 2:45:24 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
All she needs is a beard...

With that veil on, it's hard to tell whether or not she has a beard.

8-)

137 posted on 06/01/2003 1:16:16 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Cacique; Clemenza; rmlew; NYC GOP Chick; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent 'general interest' ping list.

138 posted on 06/01/2003 1:19:01 PM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Something about the eyes being the windows to the soul...
139 posted on 06/01/2003 7:47:28 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Would the State Department issue a passport to someone with a bag on her head?

State doesn't issue passports to visitors it issues visa's. Don't know if they require a photo. I would not doubt that the Muslim countries issue THEIR passports with the women being burka'ed.
140 posted on 06/01/2003 7:53:11 PM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson