Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Passes $350 Billion Bush Tax Cut
AP | By MARY DALRYMPLE

Posted on 05/15/2003 8:32:31 PM PDT by Capitalism2003

Edited on 05/15/2003 8:53:48 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

UPDATED 11:50 PM EDT:

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate revived the backbone of President Bush's formula for stimulating a laggard economy Thursday, narrowly passing a $350 billion package of tax cuts that would suspend all taxes on stock dividends for three years.

The Republican bill, passed on a 51-49 mostly party-line vote, is less than half the size Bush sought but one that advances previously scheduled reductions in income tax rates, provides $20 billion in new aid to state and local governments and raises taxes for a few.

It also would increase the child tax credit from $600 to $1,000, gradually eliminate the marriage penalty and encourage new investment by small businesses by allowing them to write off $100,000 in new equipment purchases.

But its biggest feature by far is suspending taxes on stock dividends, a provision added earlier Thursday only after Vice President Dick Cheney was called to break a 50-50 tie on the issue.

Treasury Secretary John Snow called the Senate's action on dividends a ``bold step,'' saying it ``will have a profoundly positive effect on job creation, corporate governance and the well-being of all Americans.''

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said he hoped to begin negotiations next week with the House, which this month passed its own package of $550 billion in tax cuts through 2013.

Bush had asked Congress to abolish taxes on dividends paid to investors at a cost of $400 billion over the next decade, arguing that corporate profits are now effectively taxed twice, once at the corporate level and again by stockholders on the dividends paid to them.

The House instead voted to reduce the top rate on them, as well as capital gains, to 15 percent. Dividends and capital gains are now taxed at a maximum rates of 38.6 percent and 20 percent respectively.

The Senate bill chops dividend taxes in half this year, suspends them entirely in 2004, 2005 and 2006, and restores them in 2007, at a total cost of $124 billion.

Democrats derided the dividend tax suspension, saying it would come at the expense of married couples whose tax breaks were scaled back.

``Americans today who otherwise will receive the relief on the marriage penalty contained in this bill are going to be subsidizing and paying for, in effect, these tax-free dividends,'' said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont.

To hold the votes of moderate Republicans, the package includes $20 billion in new Medicaid and other aid to states and tax and fee increases totaling $90 billion, limiting the net cost of the package over the next decade years to $350 billion.

Democrats argued that a payroll tax holiday rebating some Social Security and Medicare taxes to workers would stimulate the economy faster than suspending dividend taxes, but their ideas were repeatedly rejected by the narrowly GOP-controlled Senate.

``I'm not opposed to creating millionaires. I think the country needs more millionaires,'' said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La. ``What I'm opposed to is constantly this other side coming to the floor trying to give breaks to the people that are already at the top at the expense of those at the bottom.''

The bulk of the bill moves up cuts in income tax rates passed by Congress two years ago, increases the child tax credit to $1,000 and gives married couples a tax break. It also lets small businesses expense more of their equipment investments.

The Senate bill still has to be merged with a $550 billion package of tax cuts passed last week by the House, where Republicans rejected Bush's proposal to eliminate dividend taxes. Instead, the House voted to cut the maximum tax rates on both dividends and capital gains to 15 percent. Those maximum rates are now 38.6 percent and 20 percent respectively.

House Republicans criticized the temporary nature of the Senate's action on dividends compared with the House rate cuts that would last a decade.

``My view, it doesn't solve the problem,'' said House Speaker Dennis J. Hastert, R-Ill. ``There needs to be a permanence.''

Two Democrats, Sens. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Zell Miller of Georgia, gave Republicans the edge they needed for suspending dividend taxation. Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana added a third Democratic vote for final passage of the bill. The Senate Finance Committee had decided earlier to excuse investors from taxes on the first $500 in dividends each year.

Republican George Voinovich of Ohio declared himself the 50th senator to back the plan Thursday morning after the White House agreed to convene a commission to rewrite the entire tax code. Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island and Olympia Snowe of Maine voted against the dividend tax suspension.

The Senate had to work within a budget passed last month that limited tax cuts to $350 billion through 2013, forcing Republican tax writers to scramble for new sources of revenue.

The Senate added language blocking companies such as Enron and Global Crossing that overstated their earnings from claiming a tax refund.

Senators also agreed to reformulate Medicare to give rural states more money and to cut taxes on business profits earned abroad and brought back to the United States to 5 percent from 35 percent for one year.

John Breaux, D-La., failed in his attempt to repeal a tax increase on Americans working abroad. Those workers would no longer be able to exclude the first $80,000 of their foreign income from U.S. taxes, but they could claim a credit against any foreign taxes paid.

The bills are S1054 and HR2.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigtime; cheney; dividendtax; ratequalsfailure; senate; taxcuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: Aaron0617
Wait a minute. These African countries will have $300 each for reduced price AIDs drugs but not have money for food?

If they don't have the money who will pay for all that?

61 posted on 05/15/2003 9:26:38 PM PDT by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Tuxedo
"John Breaux, D-La., failed in his attempt to repeal a tax increase on Americans working abroad. Those workers would no longer be able to exclude the first $80,000 of their foreign income from U.S. taxes, but they could claim a credit against any foreign taxes paid." Waaah! looks like the union salaried guys that work overseas may have an interest in tax reform down the road.

62 posted on 05/15/2003 9:28:18 PM PDT by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
BFD. Temporary dividend cut. The feds are slated to spend 28 trillion dollars in the next decade, and this is just what is projected. Given the rate the GOP is increasing spending, will probably be more. Yet the lords of the Senate have decided the peasants can keep a fraction of the shekels for our use.

Republican party is a party of whores and liars. Just like the dems were 40 years ago...just haven't had the experience yet of screwing us over, but I will say, they catch on quick.

63 posted on 05/15/2003 9:29:48 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aaron0617
"If they don't have the money who will pay for all that?"

That's a rhetorical question, right?

Dig deep into your pocket.
64 posted on 05/15/2003 9:31:20 PM PDT by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
The Senate revived the backbone of President Bush's formula for stimulating a laggard economy Thursday, narrowly passing a $350 billion package of tax cuts that would suspend all taxes on stock dividends for three years.

What good is a backbone if it's been trimmed of its arms, legs, and vital organs (well, except maybe as a donated organ for the French)?
65 posted on 05/15/2003 9:34:15 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
Had to leave, he's being fitted for a flight suit.
66 posted on 05/15/2003 9:34:23 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
I'm with ya, Rose. They should be removed from their seats for abandonment and have to return their salaries to the taxpayers for not doing their jobs.
67 posted on 05/15/2003 9:42:42 PM PDT by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: BOBWADE
Waaah! looks like the union salaried guys that work overseas may have an interest in tax reform down the road.

No, Bob. Not union-salaried guys. It's talking about foreign* income, not income earned in a U.S. based union job while working in a foreign country.

*Those workers would no longer be able to exclude the first $80,000 of their foreign income from U.S. taxes, but they could claim a credit against any foreign taxes paid.
68 posted on 05/15/2003 9:44:28 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Do not be to sure the democrats got away with it!

I believe the Gov. is going to call a special session.

69 posted on 05/15/2003 9:46:18 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I can tell you for sure he isn't representing those who sent him there...
70 posted on 05/15/2003 9:48:25 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Barb Boxer is up and complaining the she has to stay there so late and is blaming it on the President Schedule
71 posted on 05/15/2003 9:49:23 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Yes--the Democrats are turning this into a circus. I wish I had gotten it on tape earlier where Senator Byrd was going on and on about how long things were taking--carrying this for 10 full minutes, then, after all of this, asking for a leave of absence.

Boxer, one of the staunchest advocates of abortion in the Senate, now claims to care about children.

72 posted on 05/15/2003 9:51:48 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
This means, when they consolidate both of the bills, we'll probably end up with 425-440; maybe.

The bigger it is, the better chance I'll have of finding a job.
73 posted on 05/15/2003 9:53:01 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
LOL, I heard her and I all I have to say is..... watching these RATS implode is a beautiful thing to witness
74 posted on 05/15/2003 9:53:17 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Freedom is Ringing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
LOL .. yes it is
75 posted on 05/15/2003 9:56:07 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Boxer, one of the staunchest advocates of abortion in the Senate, now claims to care about children.

Amazing isn't it

76 posted on 05/15/2003 9:56:55 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Capitalism2003
>> Senate Passes $350 Billion Bush Tax Cut

Nope.
This is the Senate's own tax cut. Bush's was much larger.
77 posted on 05/15/2003 9:59:39 PM PDT by Clinging Bitterly (Tagline error. Press ALT-F4 to continue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I thought it was addressing the untaxed foreign employment. My very liberal friend at work says her father in law works in the mid east for big bucks and doesn't have to pay US taxes. He is either in a union or just pro union and I guess I just assumed that he had some special tax break because of a sweetheart dema-deal.
78 posted on 05/15/2003 10:01:33 PM PDT by BOBWADE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Her amendment goes down to defeat. Oh, darn. :-)
79 posted on 05/15/2003 10:05:29 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I just listened to the roll call vote on some Kennedy amendment and McCain was (I am fairly certain) the only Republican who voted with the Democrats. It is a truly pathetic situation.

I smell this guy heading across the aisle (officially) sooner than anyone can imagine. I can just smell it.
80 posted on 05/15/2003 10:07:24 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson