Posted on 04/04/2003 5:04:01 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
Is it possible to be both against the war in Iraq and an American patriot? And if so, how do you register your opposition to the war, while not giving aid and comfort to the enemy?
I hadn't thought much about these issues until the other night when I saw a television news story about a couple in Colorado who decided to hang an American flag alongside an anti-war banner on their front porch. When interviewed, they said it was important for them to show that they loved their country but opposed the war.
One anti-war group, United for Peace, has apparently adopted the same tactic, raising money to put up billboards across the country with a huge flag and the slogan "Peace Is Patriotic." The first sign went up near the San Francisco Bay Bridge.
I didn't see that particular billboard when I was in San Francisco last week, but I saw lots of others. Anti-war sentiment runs high in northern California. For every American flag I saw displayed on front lawns or cars, I must have seen a 100 anti-war posters, bumper stickers or graffiti. Some were like the Colorado couple's banner-a simple "No War in Iraq" statement that didn't necessarily indicate an anti-American bias. But many more expressed ugly, vicious sentiments.
The worst was painted on a curb at Mission and Market Streets. "Kill Bush," it said, an exhortation that, I believe, crosses the line from protected speech to clear and present danger. Unfortunately, such hatred of the president-and the United States-is rampant in the anti-war movement.
Anti-war protestors around the country have carried signs saying, "Bush is the Disease, Death is the Cure," "We Support Our Troops When They Shoot Their Officers," "We live in a country founded by cheats, murderers, rapists and thiefs (sic)," in addition to the ubiquitous "No Blood for Oil" slogan that was revived from the first Gulf War. (Photos of these signs appear at various Web sites, including frontpagemag.com.)
The tactics of some of the demonstrators have been no less objectionable than their words. Their aim has been to grind cities to a halt-and they've nearly succeeded in some places. In San Francisco, police found a dozen Molotov cocktails hidden in a downtown alley, ready for use had they not been intercepted. Protestors tied up the financial section of the city for days and blocked the Bay Bridge, snarling traffic throughout the metropolitan region. Even San Francisco's notoriously liberal mayor, Willie Brown, complained that the demonstrators had turned political dissent into a riot by "anarchists and opportunists."
This type of uncivil disobedience won't do anything to end or even shorten the war. Its aim is to inconvenience-indeed, harm-ordinary Americans by interfering with their daily lives, disrupting their businesses and impeding their freedom. It's difficult to argue that patriotism could motivate such behavior. It's also difficult to claim, as many do, that the violent and crude actions of some shouldn't tarnish the entire anti-war movement. Guilt-by-association is appropriate when one chooses to march alongside those who promote violence and hatred.
Advocating violence against America's elected leaders, lying about the United States' motives or conduct in the war, and punishing ordinary Americans in order to send a political message aren't legitimate forms of protest for the patriotic American who objects to this war. Wrapping yourself in the American flag won't hide anti-Americanism.
There are still plenty of avenues open for genuine dissent: writing letters, engaging in public-civil-debate, holding candlelight vigils, praying and even peaceful marches. But when the nation is at war and American troops are in harm's way, true patriots will be hard-pressed to stand shoulder-to-shoulder in demonstrations with those who hate this country and all that it represents.
Creators Syndicate, Inc.
Related ArticlesDavid Horowitz: The war refutes the opposition
Source:Jewish World Review; Published: April 3, 2003 - 30 Adar II, 5763; Author: David HorowitzFoundation cash funds antiwar movement
Source: The Washington Times: Published: April, 2, 2003; Author: Julia DuinGreens and Socialists Unite to Oppose War
Source: CNSNews.com Commentary from the National Anxiety Center; Published: April 1, 2003; Author: Alan CarubaDoes Columbia University Hate America?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: April 01, 2003; Author: | Daniel Pipes and Jonathan Calt Harris'Anti-American' - Noble Ideas, But Shameful Actions
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: | March 19, 2003; Author: Paul E. ScatesThe Left's Dream
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: Daniel PipesThe Fifth Column Left Declares War
Source: Townhall.com; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: David HorowitzAnti-War Protests Have Big Price Tags
Source: FOX News; Published: March 18, 2003; Author: Dan SpringerThe left /fascist 'peace' coalition
Source: The Washington Times; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Martin GrossLeftwing "Peace" Saboteurs, Anarchists go Shopping
Source: www.frontpagemag.org; Published: March 17, 2003; Author: Brian SayreAsk Dr. Ridgley: What's the Post-War Left to Do?
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: March 14, 2003; Author: Stanley K. Ridgley, Ph.D.ANSWER's Steering Committee: Traitors, and Commies, and Jew-haters - oh my!
Source: FrontPageMagazine.com; Published: March 12, 2003; Author: Ryan Anderson O’Donnell"Workers World Party", Other Leftist Orgs Paying For Protests
Source: Fox News Channel; Published: March 12, 2003Where were critics during Kosovo?
Source: Washington Times; Published: March 11, 2003; Author: Larry ElderUseful Idiots And Useless Arguments: The Depressing Iraq War Debate
Source: Toogood Reports; published: March 10, 2003; Author: W. James Antle IIIAnti-War Activists Map Their Strategy (FR mention)
Source: AP; Published: March 9, 2003; Author: Jeff DonnAnti-War Or Anti-Reality?
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: March 5, 2003; Author: Paul E. ScatesBarbara Stanley: America: Land Of The Free, Even Free To Be Traitors
Source: Toogood Reports; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: Barbara StanleyCongress Mulls Probe of Communists' Ties to Appeasement Movement, Radical Islam
Source: NewsMax.com; Published: February 28, 20003; Author:| Wes VernonExposing the Anti-War Movement, Part I: MoveOn.org
Source: Citizens for Fair and Balanced Funding; Published: February 28, 2003; Author: David WareIf antiwar protesters succeed (by Iraqi citizen)
Source: CS Monitor; Publisghed: February 26, 2003; Author: unsigned opinionMarxist Groups in the Anti-War Movement
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 25, 2003; Author: Paul M. WeyrichAnti-war Protestors: Shades Of Stupidity
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 21, 2003; Author: Rachel MarsdenWho's Paying for It All? [re: anti-war demostrations]
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 18, 2003; Author: J. Michael WallerAnti-War Protestors Are Warmongers for Our Enemies
Source: CNSNews.com; Published: February 11, 2003; Author: Alex EpsteinThe Peace Movement’s Mumia Connection
Source: National Review; Published:| January 28, 2003; Author: Byron YorkReds Still [re: The story no one wants to hear about the antiwar movement]
Source: National Review; Published: January 23, 2003; Author: Byron York
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.