Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A "Dune" theory of Bin Laden's "Petro-Aramegedon."
Personal Opinion | 02-19-03 | Richard Axtell

Posted on 02/19/2003 12:15:08 PM PST by Richard Axtell

Thoughts have previously occurred to me, regarding similarities the Frank Herbert's "Dune" as relates to the Ozama Bin Laden phenomenon and the rise of Isamofascist fundamentalism, but they involve a specific aspect of the Herbert story, and thereby reflect some of the economic dangers to the West that may just now be appearing. Please forgive the strains this kind of speculation and comparison of actual events with a fictional tale put on credibility, and just bear with me for a moment. Also, please don't take my musings as any kind of endorsement or lionization of Bin Laden as some kind of hero, as they are not. But do think about the distortions inherent in myth making and the kind of megalomania that seemingly rules Bin Laden's evil character.

Ok, here goes: The Frank Herbert epic tale of "Dune" begins with the anointing of a new messianic character in Paul Atreides as "Muad'dib". This occurs as Paul's family clan is overwhelmed by treachery after migrating to take over control of the desert planet of Arrakis- the only source of the highly valued, life-prolonging "spice" Melange. Paul survives the onslaught of his treacherous enemies, the Harkonnen clan, and becomes an outcast among the indigenous people of "Dune", the "Fremen". Paul is reborn in the eyes of what become his devoted followers as "Muad'dib". According to a prophecy, a messiah would appear that would lead the virtuous but oppressed Fremen to Galaxy wide victory, in a "holy jihad" that would cleanse the universe of corruption and evil.

The interesting point I find in all of this is a line from a speech given by Muad'dib to his Fremen followers, in which he commands them to destroy all spice production on Arrakis, because "... he who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." Muad'dib's strategy is to bring the galactic empire to its knees by cutting off the supply of the absolutely essential "spice" as it is crucial to the lives of the corrupt, ancient and decrepit ruling class, and the entire culture of the galaxy, and forcing even the Galactic Emperor himself to kneel to Muad'dib's absolute authority.

The obvious comparison of oil to the "spice" in Herbert's tale didn't really hold up, until recent reports of Al Quaida plans of attacking Saudi oil refineries surfaced. Attacking oil production by the self styled "mahdi" Ozama Bin Laden made little sense, as long as his material support relied on oil rich arab states as his economic benefactors. But now, the "evil" Americans have succeeded in smashing his system of training camps and his strongholds in Afghanistan, and is chasing him worldwide, with even increasing success. He may still be alive and at large, but he is no fool, and clearly recognizes that his days are numbered.

So, why not now take that final apocalyptic step, and attack world oil production, with the aim of destroying the world economy? Wouldn't that be the most crushing blow Bin Laden could ever really hope to mete out against his envisioned mortal enemy, America and the West? Who cares about the well heeled arab aristocracy and current corrupt governing class? To hell with them! The true believers will suffer little anyway from the fall of the infidels, but instead will replace them in world dominance... ultimately! "Allah Akbar!"

Think of how very vulnerable the world's petroleum distribution infrastructure is, by its very volatile and inflammable nature. Quick, stealthy attacks by small shoulder launched missile wielding terrorist units on poorly protected oil wells, ocean drilling platforms, tankers, pipelines, refineries, oil tank farms, and even gas stations could drive the price of oil into the stratosphere, in a matter of days! It would be next to impossible to protect all of the vast and strung out storage, production, and transportation, distribution, and retailing infrastructure as it currently exists. The threat alone would have a profound effect on prices, much less a determined "suicidal" attack on world oil production. A world-wide oil/energy crisis would precipitate an world-wide economic depression, that would take enormous resources to reverse, devastating already fragile Western economies... potentially setting off the kind of world war Bin Laden has long lusted after, ... Petro-Armagedon!

Our only protection against such a "war on oil" has been the simple reality that only a fool would cut his own economic throat. But this constraint may now mean nothing to a fatalistic future martyr, with a bigger, grander agenda than just enormous economic wealth. Will Bin Laden "destroy a thing to control a thing"? Can he even attempt such a thing? We shall see.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: camilepaglia; dune; frankherbert; ozamabinladen; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
I posted this on the Camile Paglia thread earlier, but I thought I'd repost it by itself to see what others think. Has anyone else posted a similar theory, or comparison to this aspect of Frank Herbert's "Dune"?
1 posted on 02/19/2003 12:15:08 PM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
Dune was Herbert's best work, by far. Subsequent sequels were strained, weak, and capitalized on the Dune franchise. Herbert's grasp of the fundamentalist desert viewpoint, in view of what we hear today was remarkable.

With respect to the "destruction is control" aspect, I see the poetic link, but not a true parallel. In the world of spice, all who were addicted would literally die without it--even the Fremen. That is different than the current situation with oil. If the Arab oil were cut off, the world would enter a prolonged depression, but would wind up with energy sources such as coal derived oil in 10 or 15 years, and survive at a less glamorous standard of living. The Arabs would be the most affected, and they would not be world players again--for centuries.

Bin Laden's threat, and Saddam's, to torch the oil, is more akin to Hitler's view--if he (or they) can't have it their way, they'll destroy everything around them.

2 posted on 02/19/2003 12:25:07 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
I didn't read the entire post but as a Dune fan I saw parallels.

The significant difference is that there isn't one sole source of oil that could be destroyed. In Dune, there was a single source (worms). Thank God there are numerous oil deposts around the world.
3 posted on 02/19/2003 12:25:38 PM PST by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; Paul Atreides
Experts? Thanx.
4 posted on 02/19/2003 12:26:48 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine (those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares wind up plowing for those who don't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine; Paul Atreides
Osama isn't the Kwizatch Haderach, more like Tleilaxu.
5 posted on 02/19/2003 12:33:49 PM PST by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
There is no person on earth thats immune from a green beret, delta force, or SEAL with good crysknife in his belt. Osama's days are numbered.
6 posted on 02/19/2003 12:35:32 PM PST by DCBryan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides; Mr. K
The sand connection....
7 posted on 02/19/2003 12:36:59 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
That could never be done on the scale you suggest. On a smaller scale however, prices would certainly increase. Once the $35.00 per barrel threshold is met and sustained, the synthetic fuel industry would take off. The technology was developed in the 70's.

To keep the new industry going an import tax could keep the price at that the $35.00 per barrel level thus making synfuels economically feasible. The market would adjust to the increase in price just like it did in the early 70's during the embargo. This would be the short to mid term solution to our energy needs. The long term would be hydrogen fuel cells and finally controlled fusion itself.

American's will always adapt and prevail. That is what these 6th century morons don't understand.

DE OPPRESSO LIBER

8 posted on 02/19/2003 12:42:43 PM PST by bra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
"Foundation" by Isaac Assimov is titled in Arabic as "Al-Queda".
9 posted on 02/19/2003 12:46:08 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
Quick, stealthy attacks by small shoulder launched missile wielding terrorist units on poorly protected oil wells, ocean drilling platforms, tankers, pipelines, refineries, oil tank farms, and even gas stations could drive the price of oil into the stratosphere, in a matter of days!

No it couldn't. It would bump the price up a buck or two, max, but oil production and distribution systems are so numerous and spread out over the globe so much that a band of fugitives like Bin Laden's goons wouldn't be able to put any noticeable dent in it.

10 posted on 02/19/2003 12:50:20 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
I assume that Dune is based partly on the Muslim historian Ibn Kaldun's (sp?) theory that primitive desert cultures are strong but when they use this power to conquer a civilization they quickly grow decadent, effete, and weak.

Paul Muadib rallies the tough desert people against the effete empire in "Dune," the only really good novel in the series, IMHO.

I don't think the parallel holds. Bin Ladin thinks of himself as tough and strong, no doubt, but he is in fact the rich product of a bunch of thoroughly spoiled Saudis. Plus, of course, he's not a messiah.
11 posted on 02/19/2003 12:54:57 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
The tactics parallel, but they are centuries old and not unique. In a single phrase, hit supply lines of the enemy. Nothing special there.

In Dune, there was only ONE source for spice and in the begining they did not know the worms were the source. If not only from middle east, then the untapped oil from the aegean sea, then the south america, then us, then methanol, then something else. Petrodollars may power their ecconomy but they are not the only oil source or energy source for that matter.
12 posted on 02/19/2003 12:57:06 PM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Let me correct the spelling. It's Ibn Khaldun, and there's a web site on him at http://salam.muslimsonline.com/~azahoor/khaldun.html.
It's been a while since I read his book.
13 posted on 02/19/2003 12:58:50 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bra
Tar sands in Canada have about as much "in situ" hydrocarbons as Saudi Arabia and can be economic at about $45 per bbl (read that a few years back.) Also the synthetic coal oil in Colorado was economic at $38 per in 1980 (don't know what it would take now.)
14 posted on 02/19/2003 1:01:18 PM PST by richardtavor (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem, and pray for the French....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
There is a difference. Spice was only found on Arrakis. The largest single supplier of oil to the United States is Venezuela.

Furthermore, Muad'dib did not actually destroy spice production - his power came from the ability to threaten such destruction. Actually doing it would have crippled him as much as the universe.

Regards, Ivan

15 posted on 02/19/2003 1:03:48 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
"He who controls the spice, controls the universe..."
16 posted on 02/19/2003 1:03:54 PM PST by mhking ("The word is no. I am therefore going anyway..." --Admiral J.T. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
" No it couldn't. It would bump the price up a buck or two, max, but oil production and distribution systems are so numerous and spread out over the globe so much that a band of fugitives like Bin Laden's goons wouldn't be able to put any noticeable dent in it.

Today's oil price is $37 a barrel, according to Drudge. How much higher can the price per barrel go before it begins to have an marked negative effect on the world economy? Al Qaida is purported to have cells in 60+ countries. Certainly any attack on world oil production would have a short term effect, but would that effect be enough for Bin Laden to try it, given his desperate straits? As I mentioned in my opinion piece, I am not arguing so much that this would actually work, but that Bin Laden might just be disposed to make such a suicidal and certainly destructive attack on the basis for so much of the world economy. The speculated about attacks on Saudi oil refineries would be an indication of such a fatalistic strategy, if they do occur.

17 posted on 02/19/2003 1:14:28 PM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
Got news for you. Destroying the middle east oil supply will not destroy the entire world economy, as there are know massive oil reserves in other places besides the middle east. Mind you, what you describe would definitely hurt markets worldwide, but it would not bring about the Armageddon the author fears. These untapped reserves would be able to supply the worlds economy for hundreds of years. Don't take my word for it though.
18 posted on 02/19/2003 1:23:56 PM PST by semaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell
In order to wreak the havoc desired, Osama would need an army of skilled soldiers, and the equipment to arm them. He has neither.
19 posted on 02/19/2003 1:30:55 PM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semaj
One scenario that has been tossed about is a radiological or "dirty" bomb detonated on a ship within the Persian Gulf. The implication is that you would shut down that waterway for decades. Whether that is true from a technical point of view, I can't say, but the Gulf is most certainly a choke point.
20 posted on 02/19/2003 1:31:00 PM PST by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson