Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EVERYONE SHOULD BE WATCHING C-SPAN2
C-SPAN2 ^ | January 14, 2003 | THE BELOVED DEB

Posted on 01/14/2003 11:55:56 AM PST by Deb

The Democrats are in the process of shutting down the Senate to stop the GOP from chairing Senate hearings.

This is going to be two years of total war. Let's see if the media notices!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democratsrweenies; obstruction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 521-526 next last
To: Deb

81 posted on 01/14/2003 12:26:59 PM PST by Nick Danger (Kim Jong Il: the other dead meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Area51
Hillary does not have balls. If she did, she would have made the Senate her goal without having to be married to the president first.
82 posted on 01/14/2003 12:27:04 PM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
They don't have Clintoon out in front of the microphones now. We have the bullhorn.
83 posted on 01/14/2003 12:27:26 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Unfortunately, the GOP isn't in the majority since it doesn't have 61 votes to end Dem filibusters. And that's going to be the requirement on every vote according to Daschle.
84 posted on 01/14/2003 12:27:35 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
I wonder if we have reached the point where our Government can no longer function.

Unfortunately, with such a 50/50 polarized mix, it will take a lot to plow through the gridlock as the Senate has ingeniously built in safeguards to allow the minority to fudge up the majority. But perhaps this condition of governmental entropy is safest after all.

85 posted on 01/14/2003 12:28:15 PM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Hatch has agreed to have equality in funding for Judiciary. He and Leahy decided it.
86 posted on 01/14/2003 12:28:32 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: All
Dorgan....*It isn't fair*....BWHAAAHAHAHA!
87 posted on 01/14/2003 12:28:49 PM PST by mystery-ak (Democrats...Ihr seid verfluchte hunde!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Dorgan, what an idiot.. It;s all about fairness .. LOL
88 posted on 01/14/2003 12:29:02 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Please Donate or Try Going Monthly!!! You Can Make a Difference!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Area51
Balls are optional. Sixty-one votes are necessary.
89 posted on 01/14/2003 12:29:51 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Big deal... funding... What matters more are other issues like how many judges can be voted on, who gets hearings and how fast, and whether or not the ABA has to report on each judge candidate...
90 posted on 01/14/2003 12:29:54 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Unfortunately, the GOP isn't in the majority since it doesn't have 61 votes to end Dem filibusters. And that's going to be the requirement on every vote according to Daschle.

It all depends on what and how you bring things to the floor.....say, like tacking organization to increased school funding.....Let the Dems filibuster that....

91 posted on 01/14/2003 12:29:56 PM PST by hobbes1 (Vescere bracis meis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
There's a section in the new volume of Caro's life of LBJ about what was done at the opening of the new Congress in 1957, when the liberals wanted to change the filibuster rule so that cloture became easier. If I understood Caro correctly, until the old rules -- possibly with changes -- were adopted, everything was to be decided under normal rules of parliamentary procedure, i.e., with simple majorities deciding everything, without the possiblity of a filibuster.

Anybody know anything about that?

By the way, if the RATs are able to filibuster the reorganization resolution and block Senate business, what happens until the filibuster ends? Do the committees function? Do staffs get paid? Is all business to be conducted -- in the absence of committees -- on the Senate floor?

C-SPAN Radio had a Senate Commerce Committee hearing this morning. How was it possible to hold this?

92 posted on 01/14/2003 12:31:55 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Should we send the democrat senators a telegram to say we're tired of them acting like toddlers and they need to get the people's business done?
93 posted on 01/14/2003 12:31:56 PM PST by swheats (Jeffords' shift made the democrat majority illigitimate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade
Collins is not only up for a chairmanship, her committee gets oversight over homeland security.
94 posted on 01/14/2003 12:32:41 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Tell me you are joking about Hatch and Judiciary!

That is THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PLUM the GOP won this past November.

Why in the name of all that is Holy would Hatch agree to this? He would simply be handing that wretch Leahy another club ($$) to beat over the heads of Bush's judiciary choices.

Is he THAT stoopid?

Damn.

95 posted on 01/14/2003 12:32:51 PM PST by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; All
All that needs be done is everytime a Dem says we want to get this done because we need to work on Social Security, Jobs , econmy , etc. A Repub needs to ask for a question and say "I agree we need to get to work will you allow the vote now?"

Do it over and over and over repeat it till the cows come home. It will get on the news that way!

96 posted on 01/14/2003 12:33:29 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (I am sure Byrd has something to do with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Hatch has agreed to have equality in funding for Judiciary. He and Leahy decided it.

That's really disappointing, but not surprising.

97 posted on 01/14/2003 12:33:33 PM PST by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
I'm sure that now that everyone is clear on what's going to be the Daschle plan for obstruction, Frist will work it out.
98 posted on 01/14/2003 12:34:24 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Your post #86... how about a link...
99 posted on 01/14/2003 12:34:29 PM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: borkrules
I was floored when I heard Hatch had done that. No, wait a minute. I wasn't.

Our own people are intent on NOT abiding by the rules.

Somebody should stand up and say, "The reason we agreed to it last time was because we had a WEAK SISTER as our leader then, but things have changed."

100 posted on 01/14/2003 12:34:32 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 521-526 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson