Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drudge: Saudis Will Allow Use of Bases
Drudge Report ^ | NY Times via Drudge

Posted on 12/28/2002 1:48:33 PM PST by jern

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Bobby777
We have a base of operations in Qatar, built during the last year that made the the Saudies irrevelant to the war.

I guess they finally smelled the coffee. LOL
21 posted on 12/28/2002 2:51:59 PM PST by Conservababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I would say Iraq, Saudi Arabia...and according to the latest book Newsmax is selling..China was also involved.

Iraq: No doubt about it. Saddam has blood fued with the US.

SA: I doubt the Government per se was involved in 9-11, but rogue elements within the Government, and probably within the Mosques, probably including members of the "royal family", very likely were involved.

China: Hmmmmm. I have difficulty with a direct involvement of the government. Surely they are involved in arms proliferation and other nefarious activities to undermine the west. In that sense, they are in the same leage as North Korea, Cuba, and a few others who are interested in spreading Marxism. But they have WAY too much to lose with a direct involvement. Rogue elements within, perhaps.

PS: The Bush administration has been playing this masterfully, holding back on releaseing the damning intel while giving Saddam the rope with which he will hang himself.

22 posted on 12/28/2002 3:02:21 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
From what I remember, the story from a few weeks ago was that Saudi would let us use their bases for an attack on Iraq if the attack was U.N.-approved. I'm not saying that with 100% certainty, but that's how I remember it.
23 posted on 12/28/2002 3:03:47 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine
Just as every painting is not the Mona Lisa, not every rant is a masterpiece. Yours, however, is.

Semper Fi.

24 posted on 12/28/2002 3:08:43 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
And may God bless you and yours, sir...
25 posted on 12/28/2002 3:27:01 PM PST by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon
Saudi's took stock and threw their chips on "W".

The Iraqi War result is settled, pray God our casulties will be small.

26 posted on 12/28/2002 3:40:11 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Oil is black, so I'd call this counter-blackmail. I like what happens when a man not a MINO is in the White House.
27 posted on 12/28/2002 3:45:52 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
AMen (#10) - where are all the old headlines - posted on FR - saying Saudi Arabia to not cooperate in any way with war with Iraq? Oh my.
28 posted on 12/28/2002 3:55:32 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Oh goody, we can use the bases. Thanks, its too bad we already had to build a duplicate elsewhere. Let's station 100,000 troops and an armored unit there to ensure our partnership continues to proper.

The Saudis are obviously reading the wind drift. I somehow doubt this is going to save them.


29 posted on 12/28/2002 5:22:29 PM PST by ARCADIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: deport
Things change as the day draws near.

Attack on Iraq Betting Pool

30 posted on 12/28/2002 5:36:11 PM PST by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
Whoops

proper=prosper

31 posted on 12/28/2002 6:49:11 PM PST by ARCADIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
C'mon....31 posts and nobody has posted the obligatory:

"All your bases are belong to us"

yet?

(well, it actually makes sense here, I guess)
32 posted on 12/28/2002 6:56:47 PM PST by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender
We could land on their ass if we wanted, what could they do about it?

More carrier groups is a better answer.

We can make US soil & take it where & when we want to dole out much needed behavior mod..

>Diplomacy="Saying, nice doggie, until you can pick up a rock"

33 posted on 12/28/2002 8:15:41 PM PST by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
I think the Bush Administration probably just told the House of Saud that we were going to use the bases whether they liked it or not.

Be great to hear Bush say that with his white hat on.

34 posted on 12/29/2002 4:51:41 AM PST by Jackie222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jackie222
I'd love to see that as well.
35 posted on 12/29/2002 6:58:33 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson