Posted on 04/28/2024 2:01:46 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Has this guy been right about anything?
So a President has immunity for his Presidential actions until he is out of office?
Obama is out of office. He committed lots of actual crimes, the first being his "birth certficate." When can we go after him.
He’s a corrupt tool and often wrong, but he’s basically citing the consensus view among rational court observers here.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-v-u-s-supreme-court-jack-smith-michael-dreeben-333fddb2
He might be right about that.
Huh? I think that is the general opinion of almost every Constitutional legal professor that is not totally biased to the left. I don’t think the Democrats are going to get Trump to trial on any of the Fed cases before November.
Democrats should have filed these cases sooner but they waited until what they thought was prime time to have Trump convicted in late summer or early fall. They assumed all the judges along the way would fall in line with them, SCOTUS wouldn’t get involved, and it would be a slam dunk. That’s just not happening (See the Florida case for another example).
Lindsey........SHUT UP.
Why does anybody care what the little turncoat faggot Linda has to say?
Hey SC, how about ditching this little b!tch?
Seems to me SCOTUS wants to narrow down and define just what constitutes a "presidential act" and a "personal act" while in office. JMO.
Little Linda’s got her own jet airplane...
Little Linda is a millionaire...
Little Linda’s got her own jet airplane...
Little Linda is a millionaire...
The impression I got, the Supreme Court hinted that that is what they’re going to do.
LOL. Money for betraying and little boys for free. Come on, South Carolina: don’t you deserve better than a corrupt and compromised closet case?
I don’t understand the point of the S.C sending anything back to the lower courts, it made it to the top court now MAKE A DESCISION.
It sounds like the way the court conservatives were going is the decision will be more definitive than that and hold any decision he makes as to carrying out his official duties whether motivation is policy or political is immune and his motivation is not material, even if it has to do with contesting an election and employing tactics that will benefit him as long as the tactics are legal, regardless of how one feels about the ethics. That pretty much leaves Smith with the ridiculous count that Trump led an insurrection with a guy in Viking horns as his general in raiding the Capitol to overthrow Congress and the government. Good luck with that. This also leaved Foni Fani’s Georgia case in jeopardy
WTF does she know???
“...but you got to be within the scope of being president.”
That is what Trump’s lawyers are arguing.
How can a person maintain the right to presidential immunity if he has never been president?
The Supreme Court will not send the case back to lower courts since they would have to face the same case again.
(Why does anybody care what the little turncoat faggot Linda has to say?)
Because he’s dangerous to the MAGA movement. He singlehandedly torpedoed the red wave in the 2022 midterms by calling for a national ban on abortion causing droves of women to vote Democrat.
The Supremes need to get an backbone and end this crap once and for all. They know this effort is completely corrupt. Shut this crap down.
Someday if a president strangles his wife on the front lawn, address such an event at that time.
Every time they pass on a strong stand, they encourage more of this bullshit. And a case involving a president should be handled AT the Supreme Court, not some lower judge where 3/4 of them are foreign born in dealing with Trump.
It’s literally what the Supreme Court was designed for.
Hope they don’t send it back to the same kangaroo courts whose bias triggered the original case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.