Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Listen Live: Supreme Court hears case on 'insurrection,' Trump eligible to be president again
Just the News ^ | 2/8/24 | staff

Posted on 02/08/2024 6:55:13 AM PST by CFW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-458 next last
To: CFW

If the court votes against Trump and he loses, Every Last Republican Controlled State should immediately BAN ALL DEMOCRATS from their ballots in the entire State for being Members of a Political Party that actually COMMITTED AN INSURRECTION. See 1861


21 posted on 02/08/2024 7:23:08 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

From what I’ve heard so far there is NO WAY it’ll be 9-0.

Kagan and Sotomayor have already hiked their leg on Trumps argument and pissed all over it.


22 posted on 02/08/2024 7:24:23 AM PST by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CFW

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/12/20/dershowitz_we_dont_even_have_a_definition_for_insurrection_were_blm_protests_an_insurrection.html


23 posted on 02/08/2024 7:25:01 AM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Wouldn’t that be mostly southern states?


24 posted on 02/08/2024 7:25:06 AM PST by joesbucks (It's called love-bombing. Claiming he's saving the world. This is a cult. Just back away. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Until Trump is convicted of insurrection in a court of law (which isn’t going to happen), he is innocent of insurrection. Therefore, the Supreme Court has no standing in this matter.


25 posted on 02/08/2024 7:26:09 AM PST by vortigern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Trump’s lawyer seems quite well-spoken and able to handle justices’ questioning. i admit that the content is a bit beyond me but the advocate seems to have anticipated much so far.


26 posted on 02/08/2024 7:26:42 AM PST by avital2 ("n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Nikki has her fingers crossed.


27 posted on 02/08/2024 7:27:00 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY
The SC has no such power to decide this. Eff em no matter their decision.

Thankfully, you are in a very small minority.

28 posted on 02/08/2024 7:28:22 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY
The SC has no such power to decide this. Eff em no matter their decision.

Thankfully, you are in a very small minority.

29 posted on 02/08/2024 7:28:26 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: CFW

I’m expecting 6-3 decision in favor of Trump remaining on the ballot. The crazy far left females will vote to keep him off the ballot.


30 posted on 02/08/2024 7:28:30 AM PST by ChuckHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avital2
Trump’s lawyer seems quite well-spoken and able to handle justices’ questioning.

Props to you for listening. You are choosing to be informed. Many, many posters don't comment first without reading the Opinions or listening to the audio.

31 posted on 02/08/2024 7:29:39 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Started about 10 minutes ago... Mr Mitchell is good... Im learning a lot...

This is quite interesting.

32 posted on 02/08/2024 7:30:32 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Yes, the result could be election chaos. But the end of this maneuver is to keep Donald Trump off the 2024 ballot at any cost whatsoever. What matters is what happens now, not what may happen in the future. (/liberal)


33 posted on 02/08/2024 7:30:33 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam

Yep. The EEO judges will be against Trump.


34 posted on 02/08/2024 7:30:45 AM PST by oldskoolwargamer2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

The liberals know their window is starting to close, so they will do everything in their power to clamp down on opposition before it’s too late.


35 posted on 02/08/2024 7:31:55 AM PST by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Who put this Woman that keeps asking Stupid and incomprehensible questions on this court??


36 posted on 02/08/2024 7:32:31 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

“...by calling them an insurrectionist...”

It doesn’t just have to be insurrection. They could say any type of crime from murder to littering. It becomes a state issue as they run the elections. All the feds do is verify the count. And it is not without their determination to add to the Constitution through theirs and there’s nothing can be done about it by the feds or the next state, or even a minority within the state. So, they cannot make it weaker, but they can make it stronger. It’s their game to play.

wy69


37 posted on 02/08/2024 7:33:00 AM PST by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot
"I’m not a pessimist, just an often disappointed optimist."

You're optimism may be disappointed when the verdict
is 5-4 against Mr. Trump.

With traitor john roberts in charge, I won't be surprised.

I voted for President Trump in the last two elections, will vote
for him again if he survives the not so "supreme" court.

38 posted on 02/08/2024 7:34:04 AM PST by chief lee runamok ( Le Flâneur @Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Sotomayer


39 posted on 02/08/2024 7:34:16 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

I still don’t see where “Presidential elections” and “Ballots” exist in the Constitution.

A literal reading of XIV would conclude that the prohibition (if it exists at all) is a prohibition against TAKING OFFICE, and has nothing to do with the selection method.


40 posted on 02/08/2024 7:34:55 AM PST by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 441-458 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson