Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sanctuary Country Reinstated: SCOTUS Gives Biden Big Win, Mayorkas To Shield Most Illegal Aliens From Arrest, Deportations
Breitbart ^ | June 23, 2023 | John Binder

Posted on 06/23/2023 6:18:48 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

After the Supreme Court ruled that states lack standing to sue President Joe Biden’s administration for not enforcing federal immigration law, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas says he will reinstate the agency’s so-called “sanctuary country” orders that shield most of the nation’s illegal aliens from arrest and deportation.

“We applaud the Supreme Court’s ruling,” Mayorkas said

.... Snip....

On Friday, the Supreme Court ruled in an 8-1 decision that “a citizen lacks standing to contest the policies of the prosecuting authority when he himself is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution” and thus states lacked standing to sue over the orders.

Texas and Louisiana first filed suit against the Biden administration in April 2021 after DHS started imposing the orders that require Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to only prioritize arrests and deportations of illegal aliens who have been recently convicted of aggravated felonies, terrorists, or known gang members.

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mayorkas said he will reinstate the orders to begin ensuring that most of the nation’s 11 to 22 million illegal aliens are not eligible for deportation.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; biden; buildthewall; dhs; homelandsecurity; illegalaliens; immigration; invasion; joebiden; mayorkas; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
I am not believing this!
1 posted on 06/23/2023 6:18:48 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Bus em to the SCOTUS residences.


2 posted on 06/23/2023 6:23:41 PM PDT by wardamneagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The President has a constitutional duty “to see that the laws are faithfully enforced” and to protect the country from invasion. Therefor, Justice Alito is right and the other justices are wrong.


3 posted on 06/23/2023 6:24:38 PM PDT by TBP (Decent people cannot fathom the amoral cruelty of the Biden regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardamneagle

Don’t forget the Harveywood stars and the other wealthy lefties!


4 posted on 06/23/2023 6:26:33 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“a citizen lacks standing to contest the policies of the prosecuting authority when he himself is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution”

I don’t even understand what this means. I’d like Clarence Thomas to ‘splain it to me.

Does this mean I can’t contest policies?


5 posted on 06/23/2023 6:29:08 PM PDT by Sarcazmo (I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Justice Thomas disappoints.

So the outcome of the Supreme Court implies the USA has no borders and only illegals have standing.


6 posted on 06/23/2023 6:30:43 PM PDT by Chgogal (Welcome to Fuhrer Biden's Weaponized Fascist Banana Republic! It's the road to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

So Texas needs to start enforcing the immigration laws on their terms and force the fedgovs hand, then they have “standing”.


7 posted on 06/23/2023 6:30:58 PM PDT by BudgieRamone (Everybody loves a bonk on the head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Not only that; this decision violates the Guarantee Clause of Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution.


8 posted on 06/23/2023 6:31:18 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Is Justice Thomas senile now? I expect the Trump trio of cowards to sell out the country.


9 posted on 06/23/2023 6:34:36 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("She looks like she's 19 years old, sitting there like a lady with her lbegs crossed." Creepy Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

‘Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote... “But this Court has long held that a citizen lacks standing to contest the policies of the prosecuting authority when he himself is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution. Consistent with that fundamental Article III principle, we conclude that the States lack Article III standing to bring this suit.”’
https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2023/06/23/supreme-court-states-lack-standing-force-arrest-criminal-aliens/

Citizens and states are two very different things, so whatever the reason for this ruling might be — that can’t be it.


10 posted on 06/23/2023 6:37:01 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarcazmo

you can, you just have to prove standing.


11 posted on 06/23/2023 6:37:37 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

Yup, and they will be able to vote next year. F this country. We’re on our own.


12 posted on 06/23/2023 6:38:05 PM PDT by HighSierra5 (The only way you know a commie is lying is when they open their pieholes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Just open the country to whoever wants to come, no questions asked. 50 million more, 80 million, no limit. All are welcome.

Close up shop on the Republic. It was nice while it lasted. Now let the barbarians have their fun.


13 posted on 06/23/2023 6:41:20 PM PDT by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big bad easter bunny

Maybe that’s the part I don’t get then.

Standing means I have some skin in the game, right? Or it’s supposed to?


14 posted on 06/23/2023 6:42:02 PM PDT by Sarcazmo (I live by the Golden Rule. As applied by others; I'm not selfish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It is hard to believe.

He’s “applauding” the decision.

The head of a federal “law enforcement” agency is supporting the non-enforcement of basic (constitutional federal responsibilities) laws.

Why we fund these federal agencies that are really just political instruments is beyond me.

BTW, during the federal lockdown, mask up and social distancing garbage, when 75% of federal agencies stayed home in some cases for more than 6 months, how did that impact you? Can you say your world came crashing down because some federal government bloated agency was operating on only 25% staffing?


15 posted on 06/23/2023 6:42:05 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

This is a bad day for this Republic.


16 posted on 06/23/2023 6:47:08 PM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

So let me just say: I disagree with this ruling. I’m a supporter of an immigration moratorium for legal & illegal immigration. It’s my most definitive issue. End immigration!!! That being said, the posts regarding this opinion are over the top. The court isn’t saying that average citizens or states don’t have standing to fight illegal immigration or immigration policy. The states in question were asking the court to step in & prevent algal guidance by Biden & Mayorkas about who should be priority deportations. The court said the states don’t have standing to ask the Supreme Court to overrule a legal guidance by a federal agency overseeing a policy- which couldn’t be pointed to in case law. This wasn’t even a ruling on the constitutionality of the legal guidance itself & the court reject stepping in and changing a policy. I absolutely think at this point, however, we have an obvious extraconstitutional attempt by political elites to disregard immigration law & the court should call it out for what it is- a top down gaming of the system by well funded & well connected interests padding their bank accounts 🤔


17 posted on 06/23/2023 6:49:23 PM PDT by redheadedshannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

More here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4163001/posts

😁👍


18 posted on 06/23/2023 6:54:07 PM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarcazmo

It was rarely ever used but a lot of Obama BC suits were dropped because of standing. It has certainly been abused if its actually Constitutional.


19 posted on 06/23/2023 6:56:09 PM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“I am not believing this!”

Legally, SCOTUS was right on this: Immigration and the enforcement of its laws are federal matters, not state matters (though the mishandling by the feds can affect the states). It’s a narrow ruling.

I also understand Alito’s dissent, but his argument was not persuasive. The problem with Alito’s position is that the federal government has the duty to protect against an invasion, but that is understood to be an ARMED invasion of the country. A !@#$-load of unarmed foreigners storming across our borders seeking free stuff is not an invasion that the Constitution would recognize.


20 posted on 06/23/2023 7:10:30 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson