[Robert DeLong]

And ours were genuine?

[DannyTN]

What!?? Russia lied???

I’m Shocked!!

[mykroar]

Who they hell do they think they are, Pfizer?

[PGR88]

I can’t imagine anyone in Washington DC wanting to open the “covid vax data could be fake” topic.

[jimwatx]

So Russia’s vaxx was just as inefficient as Pfizer’s? At least the Sputnik vaxx wasn’t mRNA.

[familyop]

So more dementia in Russia from COVID. That might explain a lot.

[TonyinLA]

And yet no mass covid death.

So either fake news story, or fake vaxx, or both, and means nothing.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Only Fauci is allowed to lie!

[Revel]

And how we did the same thing!

[BobL]

Glad this doesn’t happen with US drug companies.

[AndyTheBear]

'There are signs, and lots of reasons to think, that someone might have manipulated this data after the study finished.'

Meanwhile the FDA wants to take 75 years to release all the details of the studies Pfizer submitted to them for the EUA. So we know we can trust the studies as much as we could Phillip Morris coming out with a study saying cigarettes reduce lung cancer.

[ConservativeInPA]

And we are to believe ours were legitimate when Pfizer wanted their data locked away for 70 years?

[Gaffer]

Fake it completely or hide the true results for 75 years after giving fistfuls of cash to FDA and Fauci. Same difference.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

A saline “vaccine” would be more “safe and effective” than Pfizer’s.

Win-win!

[DoughtyOne]

I can’t make ny definitive comments about our own, but it sure
is looking like 0.2% would have been a better target than
the one we had.

[trailboss800]

Uh Oh, Russia has copied what American Universities have been doing for decades. In the leftist mind, the studies are still valid because they came to the correct conclusion even if they were fake.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Are fewer people in Russia:

suddenly dying?
having massive strokes?
epilepsy?
paralysis?
heart issues??

[adorno]

...there's only a 0.02% chance trial results were genuine

Pure water would have been more effective, and any placebo would have had a better than 1% chance of being effective. In fact, doing nothing at all was the best medicine, since perhaps many thousands of people died from the various vaccines and most people recovered because they had strong systems to battle the infections.

[logi_cal869]

As opposed to the West’s Big Pharma who reported accurate data, withheld it, lied about it and later confirmed almost all of the ‘conspiracy theories’?

I’m not seeing the significance of the story.

[Worldtraveler once upon a time]

As of 23 June 2022, Johns Hopkins University's Coronavirus Resource Center announces "6,323,318 global deaths" since the beginning of the pandemic, well over two years ago.

Source: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/

The US government's Census tallies 7,903,701,670 as global population as of today.

Source: https://www.census.gov/popclock/

( 6,323,318 global deaths / 7,903,701,670 global population ) x 100 = 0.080 % mortality rate over more than two years. A mortality rate less than one tenth of one percent.

Russia's pandemic response? Pfizer's pandemic response? Moderna's pandemic response? CDC's pandemic response? China's pandemic response? Billion and billions in profits for a "deadly pandemic" which has a proven survival rate of 99.92 percent.

"There are signs, and lots of reasons to think, that someone might have manipulated this data after the study finished." So said a leader of this "new analysis." Agreed. Worldwide.

There are signs and lots of reasons to think the data is ALL manipulated, and all the "scientists" who led these games knew but took the money. Follow the money. Russian or German or American, but follow the money.