Raskin: Every January 6 Committee Claim ‘Documented by Evidence’

Breitbart ^ | 06/12/2022 | Ian hatchett

[ChicagoConservative27]

Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that the House Select Committee investigation into the January 6, 2021 Capitol incident had evidence to back up claims made in the first hearing.

Anchor Dana Bash said, “I want to ask you about pardons. You revealed this week that multiple Republican members of Congress sought pardons from President Trump after the insurrection. How many of your colleagues in Congress did that? And what evidence do you have? Because you know that Congressman Scott Perry is denying it.”

[ChicagoConservative27]

Friggin demented liar

[Vaduz]

Evidence that it’s all a sham idiots on the march.

[Paladin2]

Pure 100% Yank-a-Witch disinformation.

[TheBattman]

Exactly. There is a reason they flatly refuse to release the bulk of the video evidence - Even the bits that have been leaked or came from folks personal filming show a vastly different story than the Dem party line story.

[mountainlion]

Don't forget that their documentation is the same used for global warming, Rusia Russia Russia, Gen Flynn trial and such.

[Brilliant]

Why isn’t Hillary in jail?

[Skul]

I do not are either way. The price of everything is killing America. Lets talk about that.

[DJ Frisat]

Every January 6 Committee Claim ‘Documented by Evidence’...

... even if we had to make it up or twist it beyond recognition to fit our narrative.

[gov_bean_ counter]

Says the Marxist…

[dblshot]

First they make the charges then they make the evidence. "Sentence first–verdict afterward." "Stuff and nonsense!" said Alice loudly. "The idea of having the sentence first!" "Hold your tongue!" said the Queen, turning purple. "I won't!" said Alice.

[wac3rd]

Note how they keep saying “after the insurrection” or “the insurrection” when it wasn’t. Classic operant conditioning by the Left to reinforce their emphasis and keep the soft minded who STILL believe the media that it really happened.

Raskin is the lowest maggot in a long time I’ve seen.

[ConservativeInPA]

Scott Perry is on the ballot in the congressional district where I live. If he asked for a pardon, then I want to know. Show me the evidence. The following is in order of most to least convincing evidence:
1. An unedited video of Perry asking for the pardon.
2. An unedited audio tape of the phone call of Perry asking for the pardon.
3. An unredacted letter of Perry asking for a pardon.
4. Two or more witnesses who personally heard Perry ask for the pardon.
5. One person who personally heard Perry ask for the pardon.
6. The person or persons that heard from a person or persons who heard Perry ask for the pardon.
7. An out of context and edited video of Perry asking for a pardon.
8. An out of context and edited audio of Perry asking for a pardon.
9. A manufactured letter with Perry's forged signature.
10. The person who imagined Perry asking for a pardon.

This is of the utmost importance since I have to make a choice to vote for Scott Perry in November.

If Perry asked for a pardon, then I know he was doing the right thing and he will definitely get my vote.

[euram]

Ratskin and Schitt are two natural-born liars. Where’s all the evidence of Russian Collusion that they both claimed existed?

[RideForever]

Don't forget that their documentation is the same used for global warming, Rusia Russia Russia, Gen Flynn trial and such.

No, the documentation is from the camera phones from the public crowd and uploaded to the internet and shared. Anything from the government is altered in some way.

[Castigar]

Every Jan 6 claim documented by hearsay evidence provided by Adam Schiffty.

There. Fixed it.

[stevem]

It’s all kept under lock and key by Adam Schiff.

[Texas Fossil]

Raskin:“Everything that we’re doing is based on facts, and this is a bipartisan investigation, which is determined to ferret out all the facts of what happened.”

100% LIE!

[virgil]

What is the quality of this supposed evidence? Is there any evidence that hasn’t been tampered?

[Made In The USA]

I watched this paper tiger during the impeachment hearings. He is as slimy as they come. The dems ‘evidence’ was BS on top of BS and at times was taken out of context.

We watched a lefist legislative mob go after Trump like rabid pitfalls. IF they truly had evidence to support their BS claims, they would have been successful.

Ranking should resign in dishonor and shame. He and all the rest of his sick leftist thugs.

[antidemoncrat]

“Raskin: Every January 6 Committee Claim ‘Documented by Evidence’”

Raskin: Every January 6 Committee Claim ‘Decorated with excrement

There, fixed it