Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supreme Court has a Clarence Thomas (and Ginni Thomas) problem
NBC News / Comcast ^ | March 19, 2022 | By Wayne Batchis

Posted on 03/20/2022 7:23:22 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Many Americans have grown increasingly numb from a seemingly endless stream of dispiriting stories highlighting our political leaders’ fading commitment to democracy. However, if anything has the potential to awaken us from our stupor of exhaustion, it must be the recent news that Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, attended the Jan. 6 populist rally at the Ellipse in Washington, which preceded that day's Capitol riot.

Thomas and her political activities have long raised eyebrows. Thomas is a conservative activist, with close ties to organizations that support many causes and positions that parallel cases that have appeared, and will continue to appear, before the court. It is rare, if not unheard of, for the spouse of a justice to play such a prominent and active role in partisan politics, if only because this might create the potential appearance of impropriety. A judge, of course, is expected to objectively apply the law, without a preconceived commitment to a particular outcome.

The American people, however, are not fools. While we may hope, and believe, that judges make their best effort to remain fair and impartial, people likely understand that the modern Supreme Court decides many issues that overlap with our most deeply held beliefs — whether it is gun rights or abortion, LGBTQ rights or religious freedom. Jan. 6, however, is entirely different terrain.

As the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer warned us in his wise dissent in Bush v. Gore, a rare decision that diverged from the court’s democracy-sustaining record, the public’s confidence in the court is a hard-earned “public treasure” that we can’t afford to take for granted. For the sake of preserving that confidence, Justice Clarence Thomas should commit to recusing himself from any matters relating to the events of Jan. 6.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; bogus; clarencethomas; comcast; firstamendment; getclarence; ginnithomas; january6th; journalism; medialies; nbcia; press; scotus; smearcampaign; thomas; waynebatchis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

Now ask yourself would you rather have Ginni Thomas or Hunter Biden as a friend and relative? Which one is more honest?


41 posted on 03/20/2022 8:55:50 AM PDT by eeriegeno (Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Dear Wayne-

GFY - We Don’t Believe Anythng You Write About Anything Anymore.

Have a nice day-


42 posted on 03/20/2022 9:05:09 AM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The only problem the left has with Ginny Thomas is that she’s the wrong color


43 posted on 03/20/2022 9:16:58 AM PDT by Nifster (I’m see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
So what left wing organizations does Ketanji Brown Jackson's husband support? She has a husband, you just will never hear a word about him in the confirmation coronation hearings.
44 posted on 03/20/2022 9:20:19 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (Dementia Joe is Not My President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision
said, "America has a NBC problem."

Worth repeating.
Fake news is our problem. in this case NBC.
45 posted on 03/20/2022 9:20:49 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

They want to take out Justice Thomas so bad. He should beware of pillow’s.


46 posted on 03/20/2022 9:35:33 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Where does it say she surrendered her right to free speech because of her husband’s job?


47 posted on 03/20/2022 9:37:52 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie

GFY - We Don’t Believe Anythng You Write About Anything Anymore.

Have a nice day-
——
Thanks! Right on the Money!


48 posted on 03/20/2022 9:39:36 AM PDT by V V Camp Enari 67-68 ( This clears up a lot of misconceptions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Liberal judges “FAIR AND IMPARTIAL”???? I don’t think so. Not in a MILLION YEARS will a liberal judge go off liberal script. Nope. Won’t happen. They follow what their lords tell them to do. That is how they got to be liberal judges. Do as you are TOLD TO DO on cases.


49 posted on 03/20/2022 9:44:57 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (Free Will. GOD gives you the choice I accept or reject Him! Choose Him. It depends on you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The American people, however, are not fools.

Oh?

Then just WHO voted for Biden?

50 posted on 03/20/2022 9:54:00 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Now NBC merely has to quote The Star-Ledger...


51 posted on 03/20/2022 9:55:55 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Oh yes our wonderful Supreme Court who wouldn’t even allow hearing any of the election fraud. Not one judge; not one lower court judge and not one Supreme Court judge. Keep telling us how wonderful the Supreme Court is media. Keep telling us how we can trust the judges.


52 posted on 03/20/2022 10:08:13 AM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Milner

The new junta is staffing their totalitarian judiciary— in all these steps. The substitution of the revolutionist Marxists of “their” judges. We, of course do not have to obey them, and neither do the globalist corporatists US corporations if they were so goaded and scared by these apparatchiks.


53 posted on 03/20/2022 10:20:12 AM PDT by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Democrats fought Bork, Thomas, and Kavanaugh tooth and nail, but their candidates can’t be opposed.


54 posted on 03/20/2022 10:28:23 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eeriegeno

The President has a son..... you know laptop, drugs, Ukraine. Seems to be much more of a problem for our Republic to me.


55 posted on 03/20/2022 10:32:38 AM PDT by taterjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Clarence Thomas is a great supreme court justice, and NBC can’t stand that.


56 posted on 03/20/2022 11:19:53 AM PDT by EastTexasTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

NBC has a Justice Thomas problem.


57 posted on 03/20/2022 12:21:16 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

I don’t think she even stayed to see the speech. I believe she said she got cold and went home.


58 posted on 03/20/2022 12:29:33 PM PDT by rwa265
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is also harassing artillery fire on Justice Thomas, who has indicated that he might like to step down at some time.

The Deep State Media would love to "help" that process along, by making the Thomases miserable.

59 posted on 03/20/2022 1:33:09 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Breaking news, he is hospitalized with flu like symptoms


60 posted on 03/20/2022 5:01:09 PM PDT by redgolum (If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson