"Sovereignty? Is that a new pudding brand?"
Posted on 01/13/2022 4:38:03 AM PST by Kaslin
There’s an old saying that we should invest in land because there’s a limited amount of it, so it won’t lose its value.
But when it comes to farmland in the United States, there could be a more pressing reason to invest these days – national security.
China has become one of the biggest players in American agriculture. In the decade ending in January 2020, the Chinese snapped up 192,000 acres of America’s 900 million acres of farmland.
That may not sound like much, but some experts say China’s influence is much larger but concealed by having American straw owners on some of its properties and taking advantage of our lack of stringent reporting requirements and enforcement on others.
What we do know is China bought fewer than 10 farms annually before 2008, then 12-25 each year from 2008-2013. Now they are buying 30 or more per year in California, Arizona, Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma and elsewhere.
It also has made some other purchases, buying Virginia-based Smithfield Foods, the nation’s largest pork producer, and Syngenta, the world’s largest maker of crop protection chemicals and the No.3 seed producer, that indicate it is trying to control the American food market.
It is buying a third more of American cotton than it did a year ago, which has driven cotton reserves to record lows and prices to near-record highs.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture says China now holds nearly half the global reserves of corn and other major gains. Earlier this year, it expanded corn and sorghum imports to four or five times the levels from the previous year.
With farm bankruptcies at an 8-year high, it is now taking advantage to add to its portfolio, driving prices up and Americans who want to own farmland out.
This hoarding spree – ostensibly part of its Belt and Road Initiative – extends beyond farm products to computer chips, minerals and other commodities.
It looks like China is trying to take over the world’s food supply – or at least get enough control of it to ensure its people are first in line and put the squeeze on strategic competitors, such as the United States.
Evidence of this comes from Smithfield, the pork giant, which switched production methods to address shortages in China recently, even though it knew the switch would cause shortages in the U.S.
It also looks like American political leaders have begun to take notice of these attempts to corner markets on a variety of products – and it has set off alarm bells here and around the world.
In 2017, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., joined to introduce the Food Security is National Security Act, which would have strengthened protections to keep farmland under domestic control.
Iowa and Minnesota have laws that restrict foreign ownership of farmland, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., pledged during the 2020 presidential campaign to model federal legislation on Iowa’s law.
And now, members of Congress are trying again. Rep. Dan Newhouse, R-Wash., got an amendment added to the Agriculture-FDA spending bill that would block any new agricultural purchases by companies owned wholly or in part by the Chinese government and prohibit Chinese-owned farms from accessing federal farm support programs.
Rep. Grace Meng, D-NY, complained the amendment could encourage “rising anti-Asian hate,” but Newhouse and Rep. Sanford Bishop, D-Ga., head of the subcommittee preparing the legislation, vowed to work with her to find a solution to that problem.
Newhouse says if this is not addressed, we will be heading toward creation of a “Chinese-owned agricultural land monopoly.” Former Vice-President Mike Pence says we “cannot allow China to control our food supply” and that we should end farm subsidies for land controlled by foreign nationals.
At the same time, China is on increasingly difficult terms with a lot of its food suppliers in the West. It has conflict with the US over trade, IP, national security and other issues. It has conflicts with Europe over land hoarding and meddling in key strategic hot spots, such as Afghanistan and Iran. It has trouble even with Australia, a major supplier to China of food.
These conflicts could encourage the Chinese to think in terms of stocking up – of pressing their efforts to acquire land in the US before additional restrictions go into place and to corner other markets and build supplies in case of more permanent conflict.
The time for the US to act is now. We need to get laws in place to make sure Americans with America’s best interests at heart own America’s valuable farmland. There’s a limited amount of it, and the Chinese are determined to stake their claim.
They should only be allowed to buy the square footage necessary to build an embassy and that is all.
What is with our sovereignty?
How many Chinese actually LIVE on these acres?
Exactly, I didn't even think about that.
We have leaders who are weak, insulated and greedy. All they care about is satisfying their crazed agenda and their glands.
Worry ye not, as we can NATIONALIZE all these acres any time we want - just like other countries have done, stealing US assets in THEIR countries.
The United States will seize these properties as partial penalty for damages caused by their biological covid warfare.
I wonder what they plan on doing with it?
“No foreign country should be allowed to buy land in the United States.”
I agree! And as much as I hate regulations, this is something that must be controlled - the purchase of American land, industry and and businesses by foreign powers.
Knowing this was happening, I got motivated to put in a bid to by my Grandparents 500 acres before it slips away. I own a 1/4 of it now.
PS: Any non industrial region of the world is ripe for Chinese economic hegemony and mercantilism INCLUDING THE USA.
I’d say it more than looks like it.
I agree with you about not allowing foreign countries to buy US land.
They can rent the land for the embassy.
Go for it!
And thanks for doing your part, as small as it seems.
Lets see,,,, we ship out agricultural goods, sell land and export raw materials. They (globalistst corporations, in bed with the PRC, using 3rd world labor) add real value and ship back as durable goods. We ship out jobs, wealth and technical knowledge for a buck today and poverty tomorrow.
When will the right wing get behind real import tariffs? It’s the only proven way to reverse being the victim of overt globalist mercantilism.
Since they can’t take the land back to China, it can easily be confiscated by a government with a bit of courage. COVID liability can be the pretext.
China wants to poison us and our pets.. Made in U.S.A. will be meaningless in regards to food safety.
California’s Central Valley could feed the world. Good luck getting water.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.