Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Johnathan Turley Makes One Glaring Observation About Ghislaine Maxwell’s Trial
Wayne Dupree ^ | December 29, 2021 | Missy Crane

Posted on 12/30/2021 7:21:47 PM PST by george76

Well, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial is over and it ended pretty much how we figured it would.

She was found guilty on 5 of the 6 counts, and all the elites who raped underage girls got off scot-free.

I thought independent journalist Mike Cernovich put it best:

“Ghislaine Maxwell case is a mop up operation. Maybe something will sneak out but this was handled professionally by the regime.”

...

He’s right. It was a mop-up operation, designed to make sure the high and mighty elites didn’t go down for their crimes.

Can you imagine the blackmail files Jeffrey Epstein had on world leaders and other mega-powerful figures? I am sure it was a binder straight from the bowels of hell.

And now, thanks to this super-secret court trail, and all the records being sealed up tight as a drum, we’ll never know what really happened.

And that’s basically what Jonathan Turley is saying about the whole circus that just unfolded. He points out one “glaring” issue from the trial… none of the men who had sex with these underage girls will actually be prosecuted.

...

But I like how he compared it to a bank robbery – it’s really the best example of how these scumbags got off.

Here’s what Jonathan Turley said: “One glaring issue in the conviction is that Maxwell conspired to transport girls for sex but, beyond Epstein, none of the men who allegedly had sex with these girls have been prosecuted. …It is akin to prosecuting a getaway driver but not the bank robbers. Maxwell was an enabler not just for Epstein but his high profile friends. Those “Lolita Express” flights transporting girls for these men.”

...

Nobody in the “system” wanted Ghislaine to “sing.” As a matter of fact, they did everything they could – aside from killing her – to make sure she didn’t.

No deals for her, right?

...

They never offered Ghislaine Maxwell a deal in exchange for names And now you know why”

Meanwhile, a guy who stole Nancy Pelosi’s stapler is rotting in a jail cell, while a bunch of rich and powerful pedophiles are running around, free as birds.

Sounds fair, right?

And they wonder why we loathe them so much…

Personally, I don’t think Ghislaine will be around for long. They can’t risk her talking. But they also can’t have her “suicide” happen too quickly, otherwise, it’ll look as phony as Epstein’s did.

Then again, the elites are so brazen now, maybe they don’t even care that we “know” what it is they’re doing?


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billclinton; bloggers; cernovich; clinton; ghislainetrial; ghislaineverdict; jonathanturley; turley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 12/30/2021 7:21:47 PM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

Excellent information in your post. Of course the media will never ask about the “John’s”. They are part of the coverup.


2 posted on 12/30/2021 7:26:09 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
"Then again, the elites are so brazen now, maybe they don’t even care that we “know” what it is they’re doing?"

Until it doesn't. Then they flee to their hiding places. Where, like Saddam Hussein or Mussolini, they get their final public appearance.

3 posted on 12/30/2021 7:27:36 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

If Ms Maxwell somehow gets released after this trial, there will be a second woman who will also be having problems finding a nice place to live.
Maybe Ghislane Maxwell can room with Patricia Cornwell aka “Delta Karen”.


4 posted on 12/30/2021 7:27:39 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
There's talk that she might be willing to give up some names in exchange for a lighter sentence. I wonder if word has reached Chappaqua yet.
5 posted on 12/30/2021 7:28:34 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Covid Is All About Mail In Balloting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

If they (whoever they are) were so worried she would be dead already. But she is still alive.


6 posted on 12/30/2021 7:32:13 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Not even the DOJ will squeeze her for names. Too many men who are untouchable might be compromised. It must be killing the libs that one of them might be DJT.


7 posted on 12/30/2021 7:33:17 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

“....the elites are so brazen now, maybe they don’t even care that we “know” what it is they’re doing?”

They don’t. That’s how confident they are of their success taking this country over.

Elite should read “Mafia”, or “Self serving Leftists”. “Elite” is a dodge word meant to take us off their trail.


8 posted on 12/30/2021 7:34:04 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
I'm sure that she and her lawyers are already mulling over a package for a reduced sentence in exchange for her not talking, with the inference being, gee, things could happen. We'll never fully know, even if someone sunlighted some leaked evidence or testimony.
9 posted on 12/30/2021 7:35:15 PM PST by Viking2002 (Whatever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/433602/


10 posted on 12/30/2021 7:37:23 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

She will be dead before sentencing. Murder in prison is easier than outside. She had her chance to name names during her trial under oath.


11 posted on 12/30/2021 7:37:37 PM PST by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

Just said basically the same thing a few posts back. The trial was a sham in the big sense.


12 posted on 12/30/2021 7:38:06 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

I suspect more than a fair share of media types were riding
the red-eye on the Lolita.

How hard would it be to find out who rode into Lolitaville?


13 posted on 12/30/2021 7:40:36 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Democrats, fixing things that haven't been broken, so they don't work, for over 197 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

I think he’s got some of the perspective but not the whole picture. If they wanted to protect the elites, they would have said there’s not enough evidence for a trial. Then all elites are protected.

They could have had a show trial, like Hillary Clinton’s ‘Mid Year Review’ and rubber stamped it, thereby purporting to prove justice was done and proved there was no evidence.

If they wanted to protect Bill Clinton, they could have found her innocent.

They could have found her guilty on 1 financial count and dismissed all the sex trafficking, and the black book of names they exposed in the trial, as lacking evidence.

But they indicted her, they presented evidence which made others look bad, they convicted her on 5 of 6 sex trafficking counts. None of what I just wrote would have happened, in my opinion, if this was a white wash.

I’m suspicious of the ‘sealed’ evidence - it can mean they still have a lever of power to make that happen, or it can mean her ‘associates’ (elites) are now being indicted, tried and evidence is sealed until such time as those cases conclude.

So I get what he means, but I think he’s missing some things.


14 posted on 12/30/2021 7:44:24 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
I was telling someone that the only reason the prosecutor's put four women on the stand was that they picked four people who did not have connections to powerful men.

Women who could implicate the Rich and Famous were prevented from testifying. That's my theory.

-PJ

15 posted on 12/30/2021 7:46:45 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Nobody in the “system” wanted Ghislaine to “sing.” As a matter of fact, they did everything they could – aside from killing her – to make sure she didn’t.

The dismissal of charges today against the negligent Epstein guards sent a clear message to Maxwell - you sing, you die. Done in broad daylight. That is what we are up against.

16 posted on 12/30/2021 7:46:55 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I think the feds know Clinton went down there 26 times and had sex with children at least 26 times.

And, just like the Warren Commission surely knew the feds framed Oswald we are seeing a repeat.

The feds and the worldwide “establishment” don’t want a former American President convicted of pedophilia. It’s as simple as that, in my opinion.


17 posted on 12/30/2021 7:53:08 PM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Personally, I don’t think Ghislaine will be around for long
/\

I do.

She played her part,
a justice placebo,

she will be rewarded with a joke sentence

and go back to scouting and facilitating

Maybe even become an activist lobbying for MAPs.


18 posted on 12/30/2021 7:56:20 PM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

“And they wonder why we loathe them so much…”

How much DO we loathe them? Enough to ever do anything about it?

Prolly not.


19 posted on 12/30/2021 7:56:56 PM PST by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Nobody remembers the feds raiding Epsteins island and New York apartment? Confiscating the contents of the safes in both places. The large amount of videotapes and notebooks of names.has been in the hands of the feds ever since.


20 posted on 12/30/2021 7:57:35 PM PST by robel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson